General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolitical scientist says the Senate's failure to act on guns is an example of political decay
Heres yet another reason to do this: because this sense of paralysis might stem from something that runs deep in our system.
Political scientist Francis Fukuyama has argued that such inaction is rooted in a form of political decay. This decay flows from complex processes that include interest-group capture and the entrenchment of patterns in our institutions that constrain them from keeping pace with evolving problems.
Fukuyama says this concept of political decay applies to the current moment. The Senates malapportioned representation constrains action supported by popular majorities (but opposed by powerful interests) to deal with increasingly pressing problems such as gun violence.
The adherence to the antiquated filibuster makes it even worse. As Fukuyama told me, it adds to the stasis of the system. Were suffering from the entrenching of a kind of anti-majoritarian rule that cant be fixed, he said, and the system isnt responding to its need to evolve.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/25/democrats-chris-murphy-action-shooting/
elleng
(130,865 posts)'entrenching of a kind of anti-majoritarian rule that cant be fixed, he said, and the system isnt responding to its need to evolve.'
Response to JoanofArgh (Original post)
SoCalDavidS This message was self-deleted by its author.
diane in sf
(3,913 posts)JoanofArgh
(14,971 posts)and for Democrats to elect more Democrats.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,133 posts)We can't just be timid, fearful placeholders that pick up the crumbs that are left to us, even when we have the majority. We have to drive the agenda and use the public zeitgeist when it blows in our direction.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)chowder66
(9,067 posts)usonian
(9,776 posts)In