Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPunchbowl News AM: Schumer's gun gamble
https://punchbowl.news/archive/5-26-22-punchbowl-news-am/
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, the chambers top lawmaker for all of 490 days, is temporarily setting aside his natural punch-Republicans-in-the-nose instincts. Instead, Schumer is casting his lot with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) in a bid to notch a gun control deal after back-to-back deadly mass shootings in two of the nations largest states. The legislative and political impacts here are worth dwelling on for a moment.
Schumer, who is quite attuned to political optics, is allowing the Senate to leave D.C. without taking a gun vote even though 19 children and two adults were shot to death Tuesday in a Uvalde, Texas, elementary school. On May 17, in Schumers own state, 10 Black people were murdered in a racist shooting at a supermarket. Schumer couldve put any number of background check bills on the floor this week, forced Republicans to vote against them and scored a short-term political victory against a GOP he describes as beholden to the gun lobby. It seemed to be a tempting political option for Schumer. He came under pressure from his party to do something and quickly.
Instead, Schumer is allowing Murphy the Senates staunchest gun control advocate to once again try to cobble together a bipartisan coalition to tighten federal gun laws. Schumer and Murphy understand the task at hand is daunting, the prospects of success are dim. Murphy hasnt been able to achieve this consensus in more than a year. Murphy has to essentially write off roughly 35 of the 50 Senate Republicans, most of whom would never consider any tightening of gun laws.
Instead, Murphy needs to see if he can find 10 Republicans out of the remainder to support putting in place red flag laws and/or strengthening background checks, while also balancing the political reality that interest in a compromise will wane as time goes on. Momentum is important in an institution like Congress. The Senate is scheduled to leave later today for a 10-day Memorial Day recess. Which Republicans are in play for Murphy? Thats the question of the moment. Based on our reporting and dozens of conversations weve had with lawmakers over the last few days, the following GOP senators have expressed various levels of interest in considering gun legislation: Susan Collins (Maine), Mitt Romney (Utah), Pat Toomey (Pa.), Roy Blunt (Mo.), Rob Portman (Ohio), Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Bill Cassidy (La.).
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 708 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Punchbowl News AM: Schumer's gun gamble (Original Post)
Celerity
May 2022
OP
We do not have the votes. There is not going to be a deal. We must elect more Democrats.
Demsrule86
May 2022
#3
lapfog_1
(29,223 posts)1. But the only thing that is going to work
is a complete assault weapons ban, more than 7 bullets in a magazine ban, ghost gun ban, bump stock ban, PLUS background check, 21 age restriction, AND mandatory gun safety training.
Dorian Gray
(13,501 posts)2. Glad they're going on a ten day recess
They need the rest after all they've been through.
: EEPLY SARCASTIC::
Demsrule86
(68,667 posts)3. We do not have the votes. There is not going to be a deal. We must elect more Democrats.
It is the only answer. I doubt the right-wing court we are saddled with would approve an assault weapon ban.
Novara
(5,851 posts)4. I don't agree with this AT ALL
The time to get the corrupt republicans on the record is RIGHT after these mass murders, while people are paying attention. What's to prevent them from cobbling another bill together later on? Do they really only have one chance at this?
The more time that passes, the less upset and motivated people are to change things.