Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Fri May 27, 2022, 07:58 PM May 2022

Now both Meadows and McCarthy say they are "challenging the House Select Committee's

subpoenas as unconstitutional".

How?

They "sent a letter".

Not "filed a lawsuit". Not "filed a Motion to Quash Subpoena". Not "requested a Restraining Order".

They "sent a letter".

Is that all it takes to "contest the constitutionality" of a subpoena issued by the US House of Representatives? Or, is this just more Kabuki theater and delay in hope that the midterms will solve their problems?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now both Meadows and McCarthy say they are "challenging the House Select Committee's (Original Post) Atticus May 2022 OP
"Do you speak Russian?" Turbineguy May 2022 #1
history seems to show these subpoenas will not be enforced nt msongs May 2022 #2
The committee already has the receipts. onecaliberal May 2022 #3
Jan. 6 committee responds to GOP Leader McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers who are resisting LetMyPeopleVote May 2022 #4
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Now both Meadows and McCa...