Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNow both Meadows and McCarthy say they are "challenging the House Select Committee's
subpoenas as unconstitutional".
How?
They "sent a letter".
Not "filed a lawsuit". Not "filed a Motion to Quash Subpoena". Not "requested a Restraining Order".
They "sent a letter".
Is that all it takes to "contest the constitutionality" of a subpoena issued by the US House of Representatives? Or, is this just more Kabuki theater and delay in hope that the midterms will solve their problems?
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now both Meadows and McCarthy say they are "challenging the House Select Committee's (Original Post)
Atticus
May 2022
OP
Jan. 6 committee responds to GOP Leader McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers who are resisting
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2022
#4
Turbineguy
(39,913 posts)1. "Do you speak Russian?"
msongs
(73,239 posts)2. history seems to show these subpoenas will not be enforced nt
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)3. The committee already has the receipts.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,745 posts)4. Jan. 6 committee responds to GOP Leader McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers who are resisting
