It's already getting a little spiky with racial (and -ist) stereotyping.
That said, CRT is generally considered a more Amerocentric thing from my conversations with Latino friends and family and my own reading. It feels and is perceived as contextualized within American slavery, Jim Crow, and the Civil Rights battles of the Black community.
And while people may make the assumption that any fight for racial equality within America should necessarily include the Latino community, there is not the same sense of proprietary ownership over these issues. When you look at things like the CRT fight, you see a lot of articles and arguing over things like the 1619 project, oppression as the continued legacy of slavery, etc.
One of the problems I feel our party has had - certainly within the past twenty years of my adulthood - is is the assumption that anyone non-white is part of the same ideological group, or at least a uniform political sensibility. White liberals have long felt a kind of possessive sense of this, that non-whites are a natural and eternal part of our coalition. However, this is a kind of patronizing racialism that's problematic, because it betrays a kind of unwillingness to see different groups as who and what they are - not the idea we (white liberals) have in our heads about them. Time and time again, I see an approach and attitude that non-whites are a monolith who share our attitudes on race and policy.
But they don't. One example. Immigration. There's just this assumption that Latinos feel the same way about immigration. It's kind of racist. "Well, you're brown. You should want more brown people to be able to come into the country or get mad when brown people are mistreated by our immigration policies. Aren't you practically an immigrant?" we seem to say.
And whenever I see this (which is constantly), I always want to say, "Have you ever . . . met any Latinos?" The ones who came here legally tend not to be huge fans of illegal immigration. But for some reason, people in our party make some sort of oddly racist default assumption that they are and proceed accordingly.
It doesn't work, and it doesn't endear us to that community.
By talking down, talking over, and talking at the community in this way (see: Latinx), we've been doing political damage to ourselves. There's a patronization on our part that can be very condescending and very belittling.
People will shift if they think they're being looked down upon. But it's very, very difficult to get people on our side to generate the self-awareness that they're doing it. That's why I say, this thread may not go so well, because it feels like a dozen or two examples are about to be thrown down. It's already started.
= new reply since forum marked as read
