Roger Stone gonna sue people over the Sussman verdict!

[Kingofalldems]

Link to tweet

https://www.alternet.org/2022/06/roger-stone-meltdown-michael-sussman/?utm_campaign=RebelMouse&share_id=7079998&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_content=AlterNet

Says the jury is 'corrupted'.

Translation: There were black people on the jury.

[Me.]

1. Oh PLease

These people are increasingly koo koo for cocopuffs

[Thomas Hurt]

2. There are christofascist smears and conspiracy going around about how the jurors...

all had ties to Sussman, Hilary, Sussman's dog, alien lizardmen...blah, blah, blah.

[JohnSJ]

3. Sue for what asshole stone?

[sarcasmo]

4. Trump and Stone thought this verdict would vindicate them from the Trump/Russia story.

Loving all the rage the Sussman verdict has created.

[spanone]

5. SORE LOSERS, ONE AND ALL.

[Novara]

6. Yeah, good luck finding a court that won't throw it out

You don't have legal standing, asshole.

[malaise]

7. Sounds like he's afraid that he's about to be exposed

Ah well!

[Chainfire]

8. Is it the same Justice Department that brought Sussmann to trial that is dragging its feet

on current matters? I wonder if they would be interested in pursuing sedition charges against bigger fish....Somebody should ask them...

[Kingofalldems]

9. It seems to be one guy--a Trump henchman.

[pwb]

10. Are you trying to buy time Roger?

What does this have to do with you? Good to see you squirm though.

[yonder]

11. That photo of him looks cartoonish. Fitting for him.

He could be Max Headroom's older, malevolent brother.

[Cracklin Charlie]

12. Lawyers cost money.

Roger is shopping at thrift stores.

Who’s paying for the lawsuits?

[orwell]

13. So what happened to all the "frivolous lawsuit" bullshit...

...Oh that's right, more CON "performance art".

Just another data point that proves the CONs don't believe a word of their own propaganda...