General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'I'm not going to help you:' Man drowned in Tempe Town Lake as police watched, transcripts reveal
https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/man-dead-after-jumping-into-tempe-town-lake-police-sayThe incident began as a reported domestic violence situation at Tempe Beach Park between the man, identified as Sean Bickings, and his wife. Both denied that any fight had taken place.
When officers were called, Bickings reportedly tried to run away from them by fleeing into the lake. He was unable to get out of the water, and eventually drowned.
(snip)
"I'm drowning," Bickings, noted as victim in the transcript, said.
"Come back over to the pylon," an officer, noted as Officer 2' in the transcript, said.
"I can't. I can't (inaudible)," said Bickings.
"OK, I'm not jumping in after you," said Officer 1.
ret5hd
(20,489 posts)to hire them.
Iggo
(47,547 posts)Escurumbele
(3,386 posts)I am sure Lukovich will come up with something that will do justice to it.
Iggo
(47,547 posts)PTWB
(4,131 posts)Its possible (likely?) that these officers violated departmental policy and may face disciplinary action up to and including termination.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)Then why do we have cops? What's the point? Why don't we just get rid of them all and staff "police" departments solely with detectives to investigate crimes after the fact?
Granted, cops should not go on suicide missions for every sap that puts themselves in danger. But, each situation merits a real time trade-off as to whether the risk to the officer is worth the benefit to the public. Cops are supposed to be trained, case hardened and able to make such judgements more in favor if the distressed person than the average citizen would. It seems to me that bar is getting lower and lower to the point where a cop won't get involved if doing so would so much as muff his hair.
The inaction of the cops in this case will be found to be "justified" I'm sure. The bar will be lowered yet again to the point where society accepts that cops lives are worth more than everybody else's.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,365 posts)It has always been so.
If that guy was drowning in a lake on the property of a multi millionaire, do you think the cops would have left him in there to drown?
And for what its worth, that property back in the old days was often times black people.
Escurumbele
(3,386 posts)make the difference between life or death, that you would be guilty of murder, if not the law is very screwed up.
The 19 cops in Texas should be judged by their inactivity as conspirators of the murders. They helped the killer by their decision of not helping, and that should be the way these three cops are judged as well.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)That's how the rescuer dies unless he's a trained lifeguard for a panicked drowner. But they should have tried to acquire a flotation device or something to throw him, or called for a water rescue more quickly.
Response to Wingus Dingus (Reply #3)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)Abnredleg
(669 posts)They should have thrown a flotation device or a rope, but Im withholding judgement about them refusing to go into the water until I learn more.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)on getting him rescued. They wasted time waiting for him to swim, and dealing with his companion.
Abnredleg
(669 posts)cab67
(2,992 posts)I was taught that under some circumstances, you have to stay back. If the victim is acting belligerently and fighting with those trying to rescue them, for example - under those circumstances, the rescuers could just as easily become victims as well.
I'm not saying such circumstances pertain to this incident, but lifeguards are, indeed, trained to avoid some rescue attempts.
Jake97
(19 posts)peacebuzzard
(5,165 posts)Expediency or race for time. I dont think those officers were in a hurry to get wet.
highplainsdem
(48,960 posts)though diving if necessary would have been more difficult, and I would almost certainly have been outweighed.
I would have tried to get any others on shore who could swim to go with me, though, and I'd've wanted more help to be called.
And yes, I know it would be risky.
I wouldn't leave a pet in a burning building, either, even if firefighters told me I had to, if I thought there was even a small chance of rescuing them.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)of outstanding warrants. Combine that with the fact that he didn't appear to be thinking rationally or in his right mind, and that he was panicked in the water. Very dangerous.
highplainsdem
(48,960 posts)Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)highplainsdem
(48,960 posts)Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)I'm a small woman who is not a very good swimmer, I think I'd go in after a small kid, but that's about it.
Thtwudbeme
(7,737 posts)The officers should have called for help- and tried to get any flotation device to the guy- anything, even a kid's toy.
I wouldn't jump in water to save someone either- anyone here that is not trained that claims they would is asking to drown with the victim. I don't care how strong of a swimmer they are.
And yes- I was trained in water rescue. I was a paramedic on a fire department.
shrike3
(3,567 posts)You don't stand there and watch someone drown.
I hate to say this, but "unsheltered" means homeless, I think. Would they tried harder for someone else?
Thtwudbeme
(7,737 posts)The officers did the wrong thing- apparently they just stood there and watched. They should have been calling for help while looking for any practical way to help the guy without endangering and possibly drowning themselves.
Jack the Greater
(601 posts)Escurumbele
(3,386 posts)madville
(7,408 posts)With all their duty gear, body armor, etc. In the military we had to train stripping our gear off in the water, weapons, ammo, body armor, etc. Youre doing good just to save yourself wearing all that crap.
Retrograde
(10,132 posts)or one who thinks they're drowning - can be fatal for the would-be rescuer. A better question to ask, I think, is, "were there life-saving aids (flotation devices, long poles, etc) that the police could throw or hold out to a drowning person and get them to shore without risking more lives?" It's a popular town park: I would think they have some sort of safety equipment. I think the investigation should cover this aspect - was there a way the person could be rescued without endangering others, and if so, why wasn't this done.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)"TEMPE, Ariz. - Three police officers have been placed on administrative leave after they reportedly watched as a man drowned in Tempe Town Lake, transcripts revealed."
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)peacebuzzard
(5,165 posts)is to attempt to save with aids: rope, float, stick reaching out or a people chain. This is in case no one is trained enough to survive a struggling, drowning victim. The larger the victim, the less chance likely of a smaller/strong swimmer to survive. The large victim will be trying to survive by clutching the swimmer, even holding them down under water while trying to stay afloat. I am a mediocre swimmer, out of shape, and barely over a hundred lbs. As a lone, out-of-shape swimmer, I could save a baby, but not a large, terrified and struggling drowning person.
LisaM
(27,800 posts)They probably didn't have a boat, but it's very risky to try and save someone unless you're a trained lifeguard.
peacebuzzard
(5,165 posts)Or is it.?
Iggo
(47,547 posts)Deep down we all knew they were murderers and murder-apologists.
But the sheer amount of straight up cowardice from our boys in blue has got to come as a shock to some.
The sad part is, I cant tell from the excerpt above which one it is: Malice or Cowardice.
AllaN01Bear
(18,119 posts)ripcord
(5,327 posts)I'm a big guy and had been a lifeguard for 6 years when I got sloppy and approached a struggling victim too closely. People have no idea the strength people can generate in a life or death situation, I was very lucky to get away safely so I could approach him from behind.
XanaDUer2
(10,638 posts)And was almost killed by a drowning person. Fortunately, they made it out.
bringthePaine
(1,727 posts)Jack the Greater
(601 posts)They were dispatched to a domestic dispute, a situation in which violence commonly erupts. The suspect ran into the lake to escape police and drowned. Not the fault of the police.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Jack the Greater
(601 posts)Look it up
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)They had three other ways to save that man, without going in the water to get him.
Sounds like murder.
keithbvadu2
(36,747 posts)Not enough info. Were they qualified and able to do a drowning rescue?
Did they have the eqt for a drowning rescue?
Iggo
(47,547 posts)Yeah, Im pissed at cops.
Sue me.
lpbk2713
(42,751 posts)I'm underwhelmed.
AllaN01Bear
(18,119 posts)Retrograde
(10,132 posts)It was in a different state last I was there - what does this have to do with Tuolumne county?
dalton99a
(81,433 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,412 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,412 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)STG cops are the only institution that can fail and get its budget increased, over and over again.
Gore1FL
(21,126 posts)There would be two drownings. At some point you have to make good decisions even if there are no good options.