Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mindfulNJ

(2,367 posts)
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 02:57 PM Oct 2012

Mitt flips again...loves FEMA now

Unbelievable

By Callum Borchers, Globe Correspondent


Mitt Romney on Wednesday stepped up his support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, further rebuffing accusations that he would end funding for disaster relief if elected president.

“I believe that FEMA plays a key role in working with states and localities to prepare for and respond to natural disasters,” Romney said in a statement. “As president, I will ensure FEMA has the funding it needs to fulfill its mission, while directing maximum resources to the first responders who work tirelessly to help those in need, because states and localities are in the best position to get aid to the individuals and communities affected by natural disasters.”

Romney’s comments last year during a GOP debate in New Hampshire were interpreted by some as a call to eliminate FEMA altogether.

“Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction,” Romney said. “And if you can go even further, and send it back to the private sector, that’s even better.”

The topic has taken on greater political implications as the federal government mobilizes to provide relief for communities devastated by Hurricane Sandy this week.


http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2012/10/31/mitt-romney-voices-stronger-support-for-fema/6i7wW1bPskqRY73mAptYzM/story.html?comments=all#readerComm

edited to add a summary for lazy people (I kid, I kid )

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt flips again...loves FEMA now (Original Post) mindfulNJ Oct 2012 OP
Tea leaf time tbennett76 Oct 2012 #1
Mitt Romney on Wednesday stepped up his support of the Federal Emergency... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2012 #2
newbys I would say onecent Oct 2012 #5
been around since 2003 mindfulNJ Oct 2012 #7
Roll the tape! Flipper Mitt is not going to get away with that one either. nm nc4bo Oct 2012 #3
He was for them before he was against them ... and then for them ... and then against them. lpbk2713 Oct 2012 #4
Unbelievable!! MightyAfrodite Oct 2012 #6
Same ole Mitt Supersedeas Oct 2012 #8
Is it the right height? nt Guy Whitey Corngood Oct 2012 #9
"stepped up" "interpreted by some"??????? WTF?????? Avalux Oct 2012 #10
Mittens gives me a headache. spiderpig Oct 2012 #11
Oh Noes!!!!1111!!111 hogwyld Oct 2012 #12
He loves me... He loves me not... Blue Owl Oct 2012 #13
Ha! I said this would happen yesterday. Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #14
Ha! No kidding. gatorboy Oct 2012 #16
Note how it was released in a statement, too. Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #17
Romney is for and against everything! Science Geek Oct 2012 #15
"As President, I ..." Bake Oct 2012 #18
I'm just plain dizzy politrixjunkie Oct 2012 #19
you're welcome mindfulNJ Oct 2012 #20
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
2. Mitt Romney on Wednesday stepped up his support of the Federal Emergency...
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 02:59 PM
Oct 2012

...Management Agency, further rebuffing accusations that he would end funding for disaster relief if elected president."

"Stepped up" from what? That sentence implies that he somewhat supported FEMA prior to today, which is not what the evidence shows. Stepped up from being an adversary more like. And all in a single day he flipped -- a single day of watching a real President exude leadership in a time of crisis.

My before-edit comment (OP edited to include summary, Thank you, mindfulNJ) : Is it common here on DU to have so many posts that include only an external link and no summary?

lpbk2713

(42,769 posts)
4. He was for them before he was against them ... and then for them ... and then against them.
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:00 PM
Oct 2012



Retroactively.





Avalux

(35,015 posts)
10. "stepped up" "interpreted by some"??????? WTF??????
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:06 PM
Oct 2012

Why oh why does the press give him a pass on this shit?

spiderpig

(10,419 posts)
11. Mittens gives me a headache.
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:16 PM
Oct 2012

But I have to look, mindfulNJ, out of prurient curiousity ("oh WTF has he said now???&quot

This idiot has no boundaries.

hogwyld

(3,436 posts)
12. Oh Noes!!!!1111!!111
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:21 PM
Oct 2012

This statement is going to hand the presiden, er, throne to Rmoney and the evil queen. We're doomed!

Blue Owl

(50,532 posts)
13. He loves me... He loves me not...
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:30 PM
Oct 2012

He loves me... He loves me not...
He loves me... He loves me not...
He loves me... He loves me not...

gatorboy

(10,053 posts)
16. Ha! No kidding.
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:44 PM
Oct 2012

I told my friends yesterday that his campaign hadn't programmed him with the proper moderate answer yet.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
17. Note how it was released in a statement, too.
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:47 PM
Oct 2012

They didn't dare risk letting him veer off message any by saying it personally to the press.

Science Geek

(161 posts)
15. Romney is for and against everything!
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:41 PM
Oct 2012

The man is incapable of holding any one position on anything at all, or at least being honest about any of his positions; I think it is this latter.

How such an obvious serial prevaricator could ever come this far both astounds and saddens me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt flips again...loves ...