Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Did Guns Get So Powerful?
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
The New Yorker
@NewYorker
In 2020, 45,000 lives were ended by firearms. How did we get here? @PhilKlay unwinds the story of how guns became so powerfultechnically and culturally.
newyorker.com
How Did Guns Get So Powerful?
Decade by decade, guns have become deadlierand tightened their grip on our collective imagination.
11:40 AM · Jun 11, 2022
The New Yorker
@NewYorker
In 2020, 45,000 lives were ended by firearms. How did we get here? @PhilKlay unwinds the story of how guns became so powerfultechnically and culturally.
newyorker.com
How Did Guns Get So Powerful?
Decade by decade, guns have become deadlierand tightened their grip on our collective imagination.
11:40 AM · Jun 11, 2022
https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/how-did-guns-get-so-powerful
No paywall
https://archive.ph/Qxp4I
Samuel Walker and fifteen other Texas Rangers rode into the countryside to hunt for Comanches in June of 1844. The Lords of the South Plains, as the Comanches were known, had ruled the American Southwest for a century; by displacing other Native American nations, raiding colonial outposts, enslaving people, and extracting tribute, they enacted what the historian Pekka Hämäläinen, in his book The Comanche Empire, called a story of role reversal, in which Indians expand, dictate, and prosper, and European colonists resist, retreat, and struggle to survive. About a week into Walkers expedition, dozens of Comanche horsemen appeared behind the Rangers, armed and shouting taunts in Spanish. More were almost certainly hidden nearby.
That day, the Rangers carried riflestheir usual weapons. But each man also wore a pair of Colt Paterson revolvers, new and mostly untested. The guns used rotating cylinders; by drawing back a hammer, a shooter turned the cylinder, putting one of five chambers in position to fire. Intellectually, the Rangers understood the value of these weapons: thered be no need to reload until all five rounds had been expended. Still, the guns were small and inaccurate, and so the Texans reached for their rifles first. The Comanches rode back and forth, goading them into taking shots. As the Rangers used up their ammunition, more Comanches emergedsixty or seventy all told.
Eventually, the Rangers ran out of bullets, and the Comanches closed in. As the riders rushed across the prairie, the Rangers drew their pistols. The men fired a volleyand then, without pause, another and another. Comanches tumbled from their saddles. The Rangers had a shot for every finger on the hand, a surviving Comanche recalled. The Native Americans fled, and the Rangers followed; by the end of the day, sixteen Rangers had killed twenty Comanches and wounded thirty more, dealing most of the damage with their Colts. These daring Indians had always supposed themselves superior to us, man to man, on horse, Walker later wrote. The result of this engagement was such as to intimidate them and enable us to treat with them. This seemed to promise the decline of the Comanche empire and the security of Texas as a burgeoning slave state.
After the battle, Walker wrote to Samuel Colt, the inventor of the revolver, to inquire about buying more guns. But he discovered that Colts Patent Fire-Arms Manufacturing Company had gone out of business. Colt had been making money by supplying his repeating rifles to soldiers during the so-called second Seminole War, but by exterminating the Indians, and bringing the war rapidly to an end, the market for the arms was destroyed, he later wrote. (The thing was so good it ruined itself, his lawyer complained.) As the historian Pamela Haag writes, in The Gunning of America: Business and the Making of American Gun Culture, there was no mass market for firearms in nineteenth-century America. In fact, since before the country was founded, its appetite for guns had been so low as to be considered a security liability. A report from 1756 on the military preparedness of the colonies found that no more than half of militia members were armed, often with broken, ungainly, outdated, badly designed, or poorly maintained weapons; in 1776, the governor of Rhode Island told George Washington that the colonists had almost entirely disposed of their arms, because they believed themselves to be in a perfect state of security. When the Revolutionary War began, the scarcity of gunsmiths and guns forced the colonies to purchase tens of thousands of muskets from France.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 803 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Did Guns Get So Powerful? (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jun 2022
OP
mopinko
(70,078 posts)1. that last para is THE reason we have a 2nd amendment.
they had hella time arming the continental army, let alone the militias.
they didnt want to do that again.