So... Lets take a look at those that have flipped
Of course, yet another great read from EmptyWheel.net. It's another deep dive that goes into detail with cites all over the place. These are facts... Not guesses and not made up non-sense... Facts. I'll put in some excerpts (though we are limited) but really, go read everything. Get the feel for what DOJ is building to prove things in court. It is not something done overnight... Not in six months... Not in a year. Uncovering facts takes time so... Grab a drink, settle in and take a look:
THE JANUARY 6 MILITIA WITNESSES ARE COOPERATING WITH DOJ, PROBABLY NOT THE JANUARY 6 COMMITTEE
Liz Cheney made a comment in Thursday’s public hearing that has attracted some attention. As part of her explanation that the January 6 investigation is ongoing, she said,
As we present these initial findings, keep two points in mind. First, our investigation is still ongoing. So what we make public here will not be the complete set of information we will ultimately disclose. And second, the Department of Justice is currently working with cooperating witnesses and has disclosed to date only some of the information it has identified from encrypted communications and other sources.
--snip--
The schedule of upcoming January 6 hearings explains one reason why Cheney referenced the ongoing investigation when citing DOJ’s cooperating witnesses:
June 13: The Big Lie
June 15: Decapitate DOJ
June 16: Pressuring Pence
June 21: Pressuring the States
Hearing 6: Trump Assembles a Mob and Sics it on Congress
Hearing 7: Trump Does Nothing as Capitol Is Attacked
--snip--
KNOWN COOPERATING WITNESSES
Oath Keepers
Proud Boys
Others
Misdemeanor cooperators
https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/06/11/the-january-6-militia-witnesses-are-cooperating-with-doj-probably-not-the-committee/
That last snippet is section titles... Details are at the link. Who are they and how they are helping. It's good stuff that is full of facts and cites to fill you in on what is going on. As is often the case... It's a lot, especially when you get into the cites... But it is very much worth it.
= new reply since forum marked as read
If you REALLY need a good laugh and want a keen 'background' of information of why Navarro is such an 'interesting' character in the on-going investigations - just go read the cited article about his 'election fraud' report ( https://t.co/D8KrMHnFdK ).
The scary thing is that this guy was actually working in OUR government - and IN THE OVAL OFFICE of the 'Leader of the Free World!' 
Hey, like IQ45 always said, "Only the Best!" 
a whole different animal in the vein of the Bill Moyers, long-form investigations and telling a story school... And emptywheel is basically a professional blog site by a journalist who focuses on certain subjects.
And I only mentioned this because despite ilk like Haberman and Dowd among others, WaPo and the NYT have some deep pockets and have broken quite a bit of exclusives that made it to broadcast, including surrounding J6. Those two media outlets are also "local" newspapers for the residents of their cities, so they were never designed to be homogeneously politically-focused.
And as a note, aside from the ones you mention, I sub to The Atlantic and Mother Jones - the latter following David Corn (and to my own local paper the Philly Inquirer), and have been recently getting stuff from sites that do do some free articles like Reuters (and with many of those limited-paywall sites, you can clear their cookies from your machine and reset the counter). I also try to hit AP (where their stringers literally blast articles out everywhere before AP actually publishes the article directly on their own website). 
and continue to say that if wealthy Democrats (and they exist) can't get together to buy/create their own outlet and be willing to operate it at a LOSS for a number of years but consider it a "donation to the cause" (and no, not an "Air America" clone and MSNBC, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NBC-Universal whose parent is Comcast, isn't such an entity), then we will continue to be marginalized.
I.e., we don't control who gets "invited" to give their viewpoints unless we hold the purse-strings. 
I know when I post LBN with those sources, and if they are huge articles, I try to get as much of it in as an excerpt as I can w/o bumping into the copyright TOS. I know some like WaPo can be hit or miss getting the non-paywall versions from "archive.org" although often msn.com's news portal will reference those articles with enough of the content to get the gist.
but he was one who was documented to have done so and is at the moment, not only under investigation by the J6 Committee, but has so far been the most high-profile one who did such, and is currently running as the GOP nominee for Governor here in PA.
And agree (and I have posted this before), one of the "excuses" given about even charging for "domestic terrorism" is that most of the current laws on the books post-9/11 were directed at "foreign terrorists" and not "domestic terrorists". That forced the limitation to charging them for other ancillary crimes when they committed their violent acts, which is the same old bullshit that allowed the KKK to continue to exist, and terrorize certain demographics (who were rarely considered "people" themselves) in this country for over a century.
And as it is, it took the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing of a federal building to actually begin to get through to a handful of them to actually see that no, "terrorism" isn't just a foreign thing. But that acknowledgement was about as far as they were willing to go.
And as a federal employee here in Philly at that time, that event 1,400 miles from here, completely upended the fed employees' world, as my federal building alone completely changed its whole security posture, and even essentially tried to "hide" being a federal building at all. 
Big fisheye cameras were installed, exits were permanently closed, magnetometers were put in place, and the first swipe card IDs were implemented for that location, among many other things. After 9/11, all of that got updated and more.
McVeigh (and his co-criminals) was textbook example of a "domestic terrorist" as were people like Ted Kaczynsky, but that was not enough to codify it because there would always be the cherry-picking excuses of being a "lone wolf" incident and/or "there's no 'manifesto'", and if was more than one and even with them espousing an intent through writings/manifestos, then it was "it's not an organization", and if was a group/organization, then it was "well First Amendment right", and other nonsense. And then they would deflect and go down the rabbit hole of "mentally ill" not considering that foreign "terrorists" where "terrorist" is codified for them, are ALSO "mentally ill" - in fact ANYONE killing people like that would be.
Sometimes Congress can slide stuff like this on other "must pass" legislation and that might have to be the way to do it.
How it would manifest was the question mark but you saw the beginnings of it in 2010 in Congress with the teabagger loons and it went further downhill from there.
Their whole world was completely upended... more so than what happened during Reconstruction.
