Huge mistake to not charge Trump if they have the evidence.

[slater71]

Biggest mistake ever to not charge Trump when they have the evidence because the monster that Trump would become would make what he did in his first term would look like child's play. This article says they could do this. Not saying they will but I don`t like the article at all. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/does-the-justice-department-want-to-charge-trump-heres-what-could-happen/ar-AAYlr3p?li=BBnb7Kz

[agingdem]

1. can't stand the MSM's ridiculous "devil's advocate" op eds...

[Baked Potato]

2. Let the January 6 hearing play out and then

the American People will demand it.

Got to get the People on board with the takedown of a top political figure.

[elleng]

3. Yes

[RKP5637]

4. It would be basically saying, hey, this behavior is perfectly fine. Have another go at it. n/t

[thomski64]

7. It would be the same mistake..

... as was made in not charging
Jefferson Davis, the last treasonous
President (in) the United States.

[Kablooie]

5. I read that there are many secret laws known only to the DOJ.

These might limit or prevent charging politicians for certain crimes and might be why most Republican politicians aren't being charged. They might also protect an ex-president.

[Timewas]

6. If Not

The the entire thing is a waste of time. If the best they can do is nail a few small fry flunkies then the idea of the "Rule of Law" is a farce and what this country supposedly stands for is phony and wasted effort in the end.

[Thunderbeast]

8. Fannie Wallis is assembling an election fraud case.

Trump is on tape soliciting fraud. Witnesses place Lindsey Graham in the mix. "Alternate Electors" signed
and submitted fraudulent documents.

It all adds up to violation of state Racketeering...a crime that Wallis is not afraid to charge. A conviction could put TFG in state prison for 20 years.

The federal charges could be moot relative to the crime boss at that point.