General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAndrea Mitchell was getting *dragged* on Twitter this morning.
MSNBC screwed up by not setting Mitchell aside and having someone competent handle the daytime coverage. It will be interesting to see what happens Wednesday... if anyone is still bothering to watch MSNBC that day.
Link to tweet
I had to turn off @MSNBC , because Andrea Mitchell is pushing "the economy" on us as the issue people really care about. News media are complicit in MAKING that the issue instead of whether we lose our democracy or not. Will be watching the @January6thCmte hearing on @cspan.
Quote Tweet Stan Van Gundy @realStanVG · Jun 1210:28 AM · Jun 13, 2022
I cant believe this would be a controversial statement but it will be inflation is not as big a problem as a U.S. President trying to overthrow the results of an election and inciting an attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Link to tweet
So the general consensus is "I can't or won't watch Andrea Mitchell".
Way to go @MSNBC
You're alienating your own viewers bc you won't listen. That's ok, you don't need our ratings, right? It's a good thing bc mine go to @PBS
Welcome to holding the media accountable.
10:58 AM · Jun 13, 2022.
Link to tweet
I can't watch @MSNBC if Andrea Mitchell is on during the second 1/6 hearing.
If Valium came to life, its' voice would sound like her voice.
10:35 AM · Jun 13, 2022
Link to tweet
MSNBC decided to create the most unwatchable panel for today's hearing
Katie Tur and Andrea Mitchell
[gif of woman changing channel]
10:23 AM · Jun 13, 2022
Link to tweet
Every time MSNBC has Andrea Mitchell on I say to myself Damn, shes terrible. But it could be worse.
Could be Chuck Todd.
10:26 AM · Jun 13, 2022
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Mitchell is truly unwatchable. What is MSNBC thinking?
FalloutShelter
(11,854 posts)Keep it up MSNBC...
kairos12
(12,856 posts)her words. She is terrible.
iluvtennis
(19,851 posts)MontanaMama
(23,307 posts)because Bill Stepien wasn't going to appear. Anybody see the J6 team scrambling? Nope. Once again, Andrea is wrong at best and making crap up at worst. Wish MSNBC would set her free.
AllTooEasy
(1,260 posts)Gee Whiz! If we Dems, especially Biden, campaign on "forget the economy, focus on the 'loss of our democracy' that didn't happen" then:
1) Biden will lose
2) A Repuke POTUS will appoint more conservative judges and justices
3) Repukes will further f-up the economy, as usual
4) We Will surely lose our democracy
Andrea is an ass, and always will be. That being said, I don't need Andrea's snobby-toned speeches to figure out that the Media is isn't pushing the economy as the big issue. Inflated commodity prices, lesser disposable income, unaffordable housing, and the higher bills in Americans' faces are doing an excellent job of that! Friends, family, colleagues, and strangers tell me this everyday. Y'all trying to convince the American people to focus on what you think (and rightfully so) is the most important issue; and their day-to-day experiences are screening you out. Then you want to blame the Media. Sheesh.
Look, my economic situation is wonderful. House, rental house, car, student loans...all paid off. Credit score consistently over 800, and credit card balances are completely paid off at the end of every month. I fill up the gas tank and pay my taxes without any reservation. I can Financially afford to place the Jan. 6 events at #1. Dems got my vote! But I'm in the economic minority, especially amongst my fellow Black Americans. Still, I refuse to imitate Haughty-Taughty folks like Dr. Vicky Hayes (whoever the hell she is), folks who can't (or refuse to) relate of Americans with more pressing needs for basic necessities. We Dems better get in touch with, address, and resolve the people's highest priorities, and not what she wants their priorities to be.
Thankfully, Biden isn't listening to Dr. Vicky Hayes (whoever the hell she is) and is putting more effort into the economy than any other issue.
TheBlackAdder
(28,184 posts).
I cut the TV cord and haven't looked back. I got a couple hours of each day back.
If some jumps, and they jump over and over, sooner or later they will bail on watching your network.
.
MontanaMama
(23,307 posts)I signed up to stream live tv via Hulu just for these hearings. Ill unsubscribe when theyre over. I didnt think that I would be able to see the hearings on YouTube or anywhere else and I was worried that I would miss them I think theyre very important to watch. My apolitical spouse has been coming home early from work to watch them in fact. Surprisingly, when I got to my office this morning, hubs was sitting at my desk with Hulu on my laptop watching the hearings. Its worth it to subscribe for that reason alone.
spooky3
(34,439 posts)Is a vote for competent leadership AND a vote to save democracy.
The media needs to explain to people what causes inflation so that they can understand what a President can and cant do about it. Whenever votes are taken in Congress, they should show the breakdown of votes by party. They should tell voters what Republicans say they will do to stop inflation (so far, they have said nothing; they have no plan).
Stop coddling childlike viewers who are just want to be mad at someone, and help educate them.
sop
(10,162 posts)They never explain why Biden is responsible for inflation. It's just conventional wisdom, and Andrea is the queen of conventional wisdom.
spooky3
(34,439 posts)Education or experience themselves on finance and economic issues (Stephanie Ruhle and Ali Velshi are exceptions). They dont understand, so they cant explain it. Another problem is deadlines. They have to do a wide variety of stories with little time to investigate in depth. OTOH, they could call in experts to help, which they often do on other topics, and given that this is a recurring issue, they should get a handle on it.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)I have to suspect there's some other reason her show is where economic facts go to die.
spooky3
(34,439 posts)Every tv reporter, IMHO.
LiberalFighter
(50,895 posts)I skimmed past until the Hearing was called into order. Then skimmed past during the breaks. Totally avoided listening to the twit.
Meadowoak
(5,545 posts)She can be home to care for her loving husband, Alan Greedspan.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)I dont watch her and so happy chuck is gone from daily show. So far have liked Chris.
Marcuse
(7,479 posts)dem4decades
(11,282 posts)Do the powers that be really think people watch her or are they just trying to get people to tune out.?
BlueBloodedAmerican
(117 posts)madashelltoo
(1,698 posts)Cant listen to those two at all
dem4decades
(11,282 posts)Can't they just go away? Obviously they know Todd is horrible, they keep moving him, just move him to midnight and be done with him.
And throw a nice retirement party for Andrea and let her fade into the sunset with her Republican, dipshit husband.
ChazII
(6,204 posts)displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)We just include Morning Joe & his little woman.
Efilroft Sul
(3,579 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)If MSNBC wants to stay credible, they need to put her out to pasture - permanently.
kimbutgar
(21,131 posts)It was so much more enlightening. I cant stand Andrea Mitchell. She needs to retire.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)tavernier
(12,381 posts)Only I added that she needed a sock stuffed into her bony face.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)For the life of me I still can't figure out why MSNBC is so Jekyll & Hyde.
Mitchell and Todd are THE WORST. Bothsiders at best, 1% schills overall.
One would have thought they would try to expand their daytime audience after last Thursday's mega ratings win by the 'Evening Crew'.
One thought wrong.
crickets
(25,963 posts)I changed channels as well, within seconds. Mitchell is unbearable.
dem4decades
(11,282 posts)Diablo del sol
(424 posts)But even without that she was horrible. Incoherent word salad, couldnt get through a sentence without making mistake.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)I can just hear the director in her earpiece shouting "Andrea! ANDREA!"
ybbor
(1,554 posts)Why do they never bring up that the inflation is being stoked by corporate greed, and they are raking in record profits, 50 year highs.
They need to find a capable host if they want to keep an audience. There are many sources to witness this.
Cha
(297,154 posts)I'd like to see her Dragged OFF the air.
💙💛
chillfactor
(7,574 posts)but if Mitchell is there Wednesday morning, I will switch to CNN.
Hekate
(90,646 posts)I guess nobody in the country will watch a history-making Congressional hearing about a damn coup detat because of one antique journalist.
Really?
Christ on a trailer hitch.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)app on my iphone. Will repeat this evening. That way can avoid all the so called pundits and get the information straight from the source.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Just not Andrea Mitchell's coverage on MSNBC.
aggiesal
(8,911 posts)It will take a day to read them all.
She literally can't think fast and she's a slow speaker (yawn).
Haggis 4 Breakfast
(1,453 posts)HRC made a comment about how wrong she thought Alan Greenspan had been on several matters. I agreed with her. In less than 24 hours, Andrea Mitchell - who is NOT an economist - was savaging HRC over her comments. On Air. On NBC. During her reporting on other matters. She was relentless and viscious in her remarks. I was stunned. How could NBC allow her to get away with that ? If Greenspan had spoken up that would have been another matter, but to hear Andrea Mitchell shoot her mouth off like that, infuriated me. I wrote to NBC to voice my opinion. I never heard from them.
I have never been a fan of Mitchell, but that incident proved to me that she was not an impartial reporter, incapable of putting aside her personal opinions and reporting the news straight out. I am not interested in hearing her personal axe to grind.
Her croaking voice is like nails on a chalkboard to my ears. She frequently stumbles over her words and incoherently tries to regroup. It's past time for NBC to take her off the air. There is viable, vibrant young talent at NBC just waiting in the wings to shine. People with intelligence, wit and a far better understanding of history than Mitchell ever displayed.
NBC -- If you're listening -- we viewers are telling you what we want. Drop Andrea Mitchell.
malaise
(268,949 posts)crickets
(25,963 posts)I fell down the rabbit hole at one point today, reading on and on about how badly Mitchell's performance was received. Some of the tweets are comedy gold, but almost all of them are from people disgusted that MSNBC did not do right by the American people this morning. There's no excuse for it; stakes are too high and we all deserve better.
aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)zeusdogmom
(990 posts)My local NPR station (WOSU) is awesome. Local and national programming. If Im home, it is on.
SouthBayDem
(32,018 posts)The lack of profit motive allows for emphasis on ideas and quality control rather than clickbait, gossip, and hype. I don't understand why people pay for the empty mind rot of CNN/FNC/MSNBC.
tinymontgomery
(2,584 posts)I taped C-Span and am watching now. Easier to watch.
jalan48
(13,860 posts)because she's still babbling away on TV.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)She's been married for 25 years to ALAN GREENSPAN
Greenspan served 5 terms as Chairman of the Federal Reserve....
he breathes $$$$$$$$$$
dchill
(38,472 posts)Yep. And it's the usual suspects every time. "Inflation" is the new "whataboutism."
BumRushDaShow
(128,877 posts)And if they are tied up, I'll try to hit PBS.
Since CSPAN & CSPAN2 are committed to coverage of regular House/Senate sessions (and many of their hearings) and the House gaveled in at noon ET today (where CSPAN had to cut away for that), I switched to CSPAN2 (where the Senate was expected to gavel in at 3 pm ET, after the hearing was done) and saw the remainder of the hearing. Whenever both chambers are in session and there's a big hearing, CSPAN3 will usually cover it. And if not near a TV, I can usually stream it with the CSPAN Radio app (or on my SiriusXM radio), which will often broadcast those hearings even with the House in session.
Last Thursday I did go to MSNBC with the "night crew" after the hearing adjourned.
Don't have to suffer through the same talking head bloviators who demand a cut away from the coverage so they can "comment". With today's session, since people had forewarned about Mitchell, I went to CNN when the hearing was done.
Mitchell and Schmuck Toad are the detritus still left at MSNBC/NBC that need to go the way of Tweety.
LiberalFighter
(50,895 posts)pamdb
(1,332 posts)Isn't it about time for Mrs. Greeenspan to reitre>
badhair77
(4,216 posts)I looked back a few times and decided my initial decision was the correct one. Guess Ill start with CNN on Wednesday.
Escurumbele
(3,389 posts)of her idiocy...
Andrea Mitchell asked one of her guests if it was more important to fix the economy than to make people accountable, or something stupid like that, and Katie Tur opened her eyes like saying "WTF?". I wish I could remember the exact question...I think it was Poindexter who was being interviewed, and he was caught by surprise but answered it very well.
Susan Calvin
(1,646 posts)I do not listen to Alan Greenspan's wife.
Takket
(21,563 posts)clicked on her name and must have read about 50 tweets of people all saying they changed the channel and couldn't listen to her. for goodness sake, MSNBC, take old yeller out back and out her put of her misery.