Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rules that Native Americans prosecuted in tribal courts can also be prosecuted (Original Post) elleng Jun 2022 OP
How can this not be double jeopardy? LakeVermilion Jun 2022 #1
Same reason people can be tried in state courts. Separate sovereigns. NutmegYankee Jun 2022 #2
I don't think people are aware of this. Dr. Strange Jun 2022 #12
Which is weird, because no one bats an eyelash at this Effete Snob Jun 2022 #14
It's not because the tribal courts aren't part of our justice system. So WE'RE only trying them once NCLefty Jun 2022 #3
DISSENT: elleng Jun 2022 #4
I don't get this. I thought their treaties entitled them to independence within US territory. Karadeniz Jun 2022 #5
And we've ALWAYS honored those treaties... regnaD kciN Jun 2022 #6
But the justices disagreed. elleng Jun 2022 #7
Legal minds seem prone to picking up on the less important logic. Karadeniz Jun 2022 #8
They are sovereign, but not independent GregariousGroundhog Jun 2022 #11
This is a rogue court for sure. Demsrule86 Jun 2022 #9
I wonder who wrote that for ACB? Bobstandard Jun 2022 #10
Agree. This is a terrible decision. Deuxcents Jun 2022 #13

Dr. Strange

(25,919 posts)
12. I don't think people are aware of this.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 12:05 AM
Jun 2022

Based on the replies, it looks like people think you can only be tried by state or federal courts, but not both.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
3. It's not because the tribal courts aren't part of our justice system. So WE'RE only trying them once
Mon Jun 13, 2022, 10:36 PM
Jun 2022

It does seem messed up though.

elleng

(130,864 posts)
4. DISSENT:
Mon Jun 13, 2022, 10:41 PM
Jun 2022

In a dissent, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that the case involved the same “defendant, same crime, same prosecuting authority” and said the majority’s reasoning was “at odds with the text and original meaning of the Constitution.” The conservative Gorsuch was joined in dissent by two of the court’s three liberal justices, Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan.

elleng

(130,864 posts)
7. But the justices disagreed.
Mon Jun 13, 2022, 11:11 PM
Jun 2022

“Denezpi’s single act led to separate prosecutions for violations of a tribal ordinance and a federal statute.
Because the Tribe and the Federal Government are distinct sovereigns, those” offenses are not the same, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for a majority of the court. “Denezpi’s second prosecution therefore did not offend the Double Jeopardy Clause.”

GregariousGroundhog

(7,518 posts)
11. They are sovereign, but not independent
Mon Jun 13, 2022, 11:54 PM
Jun 2022

The United States is a collection of 50 sovereign states and hundreds of native american tribes. Federal law governs all land in U.S. possession; even if that land is within the boundaries of a state or native american tribe.

Bobstandard

(1,303 posts)
10. I wonder who wrote that for ACB?
Mon Jun 13, 2022, 11:26 PM
Jun 2022

it’s a terrible decision, but I think, knowing her background, that it’s reasonable to expect that she didn’t write it herself. And I don’t mean put the decision into literary shape. She’s on the hook to conservative special interests who think it a favor to hand her the decision and her language. And, if her intitial hearings were any indication, she’d be grateful.

Pack the courts Joe. Seriously. One seat was stolen, others were the result of clear perjury.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court rules that ...