Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Stepien's wife have the baby? (Original Post) tavernier Jun 2022 OP
I thought it would be a case of Braxton-Hicks. mnhtnbb Jun 2022 #1
"My mother died again!" Wounded Bear Jun 2022 #2
Great question malaise Jun 2022 #3
SO true -- thumbs up to you+++ allegorical oracle Jun 2022 #6
Distrustful -- for a good reason, enquiring minds want KPN Jun 2022 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author JohnSJ Jun 2022 #5
That Whole Article Was Sarcastic SoCalDavidS Jun 2022 #8
Thanks. Still, he gave taped testimony JohnSJ Jun 2022 #17
Congratulations to the parents. tavernier Jun 2022 #10
Did you read that? n/t malaise Jun 2022 #12
No. It was already pointed out that it was a sarcastic article. Still he already gave taped JohnSJ Jun 2022 #19
Zoe Lofgren says it's no big deal bigtree Jun 2022 #7
"There's no big deal," panel member Rep. Lofgren tells @Morning_Joe . LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #24
I did a Google search Mz Pip Jun 2022 #37
I did a better google search. onenote Jun 2022 #41
So was the committee incompetent or complicit. brooklynite Jun 2022 #9
Yes. tavernier Jun 2022 #11
How sad. brooklynite Jun 2022 #13
Aw, you are a trusting soul. tavernier Jun 2022 #18
Perhaps because I start with... brooklynite Jun 2022 #29
OH NO!!! A CRIME!! Let's See If It's Prosecuted If It's True SoCalDavidS Jun 2022 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author JohnSJ Jun 2022 #14
Now, why would you want to ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory? brooklynite Jun 2022 #15
That was a sarcastic piece. Still the point is lying to a congressional committee, after giving JohnSJ Jun 2022 #16
This could be a clever lie since malaise Jun 2022 #20
He already gave taped testimony under oath that we saw yesterday malaise, and it correlates with JohnSJ Jun 2022 #22
Do you think that he thought the Committee malaise Jun 2022 #27
No question that if he testified live it would have more impact, but as you said, the committee JohnSJ Jun 2022 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Jun 2022 #28
24 Hours Later, I'm Going With NO! SoCalDavidS Jun 2022 #23
False labor, perhaps? AngryOldDem Jun 2022 #25
"He needs to be confronted in person" brooklynite Jun 2022 #30
Poor choice of words. Sorry. It happens. AngryOldDem Jun 2022 #38
Damn right it was false. Iggo Jun 2022 #43
DoEs He eVeN hAvE a WiFe????///?////??????????? WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2022 #26
Does a blow up doll count? bluesbassman Jun 2022 #33
Conspiracies are rarely a good look Sympthsical Jun 2022 #31
They weren't being complicit. tavernier Jun 2022 #32
You don't think they'd know? Sympthsical Jun 2022 #34
How woul they know malaise Jun 2022 #36
I think we're allowed to take the piss tavernier Jun 2022 #45
+1 AngryOldDem Jun 2022 #39
Google is your friend. onenote Jun 2022 #35
Thank you. Sanity is appreciated. Eom Maeve Jun 2022 #44
The OP asked if she'd DELIVERED, not when the due date was, or when the Baby Shower was. maxsolomon Jun 2022 #46
That effin' simple malaise Jun 2022 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author RussBLib Jun 2022 #42
lol. I wondered about that when I heard. I assumed the J6 ecstatic Jun 2022 #47
Well she might have had a cow miyazaki Jun 2022 #48

mnhtnbb

(33,348 posts)
1. I thought it would be a case of Braxton-Hicks.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:44 AM
Jun 2022

Easy excuse. Having contractions, then they turn out to be false labor. Who would question it?

malaise

(296,103 posts)
3. Great question
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:49 AM
Jun 2022

I’m betting no.
Why should this first-rate low-life Bridgegate liar be honest now?

KPN

(17,377 posts)
4. Distrustful -- for a good reason, enquiring minds want
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:50 AM
Jun 2022

to know — even though his not appearing may not have actually mattered to the hearing’s success and eventual effect. I’m thinking he wanted to recant his earlier testimony, but knew that could entirely torpedo his future and opted for “the wife’s in labor” excuse instead. Did I mention distrustful minds?

Response to tavernier (Original post)

 

SoCalDavidS

(10,599 posts)
8. That Whole Article Was Sarcastic
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:55 AM
Jun 2022

There are no reports out there confirming there was a birth.

tavernier

(14,443 posts)
10. Congratulations to the parents.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:57 AM
Jun 2022

Apologies to the child for the misfortune of being born into a republican’t family.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
19. No. It was already pointed out that it was a sarcastic article. Still he already gave taped
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:09 AM
Jun 2022

testimony which was shown yesterday, and provided collaboration that trump ever was going to leave the WH

Thanks for the heads up. I should have read it

bigtree

(94,261 posts)
7. Zoe Lofgren says it's no big deal
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:54 AM
Jun 2022

...problems with completing the video presentation.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a member of the committee, told reporters that the reason for the rescheduling was due to “technical issues” and “not a big deal.”


“It’s just technical issues,” she said. “You know the staff, putting together all the videos. You know doing, one, two, three, it was overwhelming. So we’re trying to give them a little room.”


Lofgren said Wednesday’s hearing topic, which was focused on the Department of Justice, will get moved to another day, and Thursday will still focus on then-President Donald Trump’s efforts to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to certify the election results.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/14/politics/january-6-committee-wednesday-hearing/index.html

onenote

(46,142 posts)
41. I did a better google search.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 12:30 PM
Jun 2022

Found his wife's FB page on which, back on May 1, she posted pictures of her baby shower. It indicated that they were expecting a baby boy and that the baby was due in 6 weeks.

In all likelihood, the Committee was apprised in advance that he might be unavailable, which is why the Committee was fully prepared to go forward with a taped alternative.

But my guess is that the tinfoil hatters here won't be satisfied by this information.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
9. So was the committee incompetent or complicit.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:55 AM
Jun 2022

They all wished him well with the birth of his child at yesterday's hearing. You're saying they wouldn't know a made-up excuse?

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
13. How sad.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 10:58 AM
Jun 2022

Lying to a Congressional Committee is a crime, and Stepien's attorney (who was at the meeting) wouldn't likely be party to that.

tavernier

(14,443 posts)
18. Aw, you are a trusting soul.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:07 AM
Jun 2022

Good for you.

These snakes have lied to us for so many years, it’s hard for me to trust any of them. But I do wish their child good health and happiness. See, I’m not totally heartless.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
29. Perhaps because I start with...
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:29 AM
Jun 2022

"what would be the value of choosing not to appear at a hearing when they already had video of my testimony"

rather than

"We know he's corrupt, so of course he would".

 

SoCalDavidS

(10,599 posts)
21. OH NO!!! A CRIME!! Let's See If It's Prosecuted If It's True
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:19 AM
Jun 2022

I'll be over here Not Holding My Breath.

Response to brooklynite (Reply #9)

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
16. That was a sarcastic piece. Still the point is lying to a congressional committee, after giving
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:04 AM
Jun 2022

taped testimony makes no sense

malaise

(296,103 posts)
20. This could be a clever lie since
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:14 AM
Jun 2022

no one can prove there were no labor pains unless the family OBGyn speaks.

After Bridgegate nothing he says can be trusted.

add

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
22. He already gave taped testimony under oath that we saw yesterday malaise, and it correlates with
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:21 AM
Jun 2022

what others testified to

malaise

(296,103 posts)
27. Do you think that he thought the Committee
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:26 AM
Jun 2022

would have been able to add his recorded testimony with such late notice?

Bravo Jan 6 Committee - he failed to eff things up - we will find out when/if a baby was born.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
40. No question that if he testified live it would have more impact, but as you said, the committee
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 12:13 PM
Jun 2022

handled it beautifully


Response to JohnSJ (Reply #22)

 

SoCalDavidS

(10,599 posts)
23. 24 Hours Later, I'm Going With NO!
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:22 AM
Jun 2022

I'll also predict that there will be NO Consequences, so good for him for getting away with lying, just like his former boss ALWAYS gets away with it.

AngryOldDem

(14,180 posts)
25. False labor, perhaps?
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:24 AM
Jun 2022

If so, get his ass back in front of the committee. As good as the videos were, he needs to be confronted in person.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
30. "He needs to be confronted in person"
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:31 AM
Jun 2022

I don't know what Hearing you've been watching, but nobody at the witness table is being "confronted". They're being asked questions that they've already answered (at depositions) to illustrate the Committee's presentation. If you want confrontation, you're going to be disappointed.

bluesbassman

(20,384 posts)
33. Does a blow up doll count?
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:37 AM
Jun 2022

Just a joke. I’m sure his wife is a lovely person and I wish the best for her and the child.

Sympthsical

(10,969 posts)
31. Conspiracies are rarely a good look
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:35 AM
Jun 2022

People are so weird.

This conspiracy would involve the January 6th Committee being complicit.

So, that's a take.

Sympthsical

(10,969 posts)
34. You don't think they'd know?
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:39 AM
Jun 2022

Yeah.

No part of this is a good look for our team.

Just from a non-partisan perspective. It engenders a solid "Oh, FFS" from the outside.

malaise

(296,103 posts)
36. How woul they know
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:52 AM
Jun 2022

Labor pains - an almost perfect lie because babies come when they are ready

tavernier

(14,443 posts)
45. I think we're allowed to take the piss
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 05:33 PM
Jun 2022

I can’t believe they are that thin skinned.

Although their idea of ribbing someone usually involves guns and nooses.

onenote

(46,142 posts)
35. Google is your friend.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 11:50 AM
Jun 2022

Took less than a minute to find his wife's Facebook page on which she posted, back on May 1, photos from her baby shower. It indicates that they expected a baby boy and that her due date was six weeks away.

All indications are that the Committee knew that her going into labor was a possibility and had prepared in advance for it.

But that's still not enough to stop the tin foil hatters on this thread.

maxsolomon

(38,727 posts)
46. The OP asked if she'd DELIVERED, not when the due date was, or when the Baby Shower was.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 06:03 PM
Jun 2022

he begged off because she was in labor.

4 non- options:
1. false labor.
2. she's still in labor, in which case god help her.
3. baby's delivered.
4. he lied about it because he didn't want to appear, he's a Repuke and he has no ethics.

Response to tavernier (Original post)

ecstatic

(35,075 posts)
47. lol. I wondered about that when I heard. I assumed the J6
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 06:20 PM
Jun 2022

committee would have all of that under control, especially since that's a pretty dramatic and easily confirmed excuse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Stepien's wife have t...