Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demovictory9

(32,489 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 01:42 PM Jun 2022

Commentary: The artist in CSULB's new exhibit is a major donor. That's bad, and so is the art

The other day, I drove over to Cal State Long Beach and saw an exhibition of Carolyn Campagna Kleefeld’s paintings and drawings from the last 30 years, which are on view inside the Carolyn Campagna Kleefeld Gallery at the newly expanded and renamed Carolyn Campagna Kleefeld Contemporary Art Museum.

If you think this nesting doll of names is odd, even in our era of bloated naming opportunities at cultural institutions, you would be right. I’ve never seen anything quite like it. In Los Angeles, every third arts building seems to be named Geffen or Broad, while in San Diego it’s the Jacobs moniker that’s over many a front door. Fine. Rarely, however, do big, raised letters of a naming opportunity inside a museum room identify the same donor whose name is also in big, raised letters on the edifice outside. Virtually never is the art on view made by the same-named patron.

Welcome to Long Beach. Here at Cal State University, Kleefelds in the Kleefeld at the Kleefeld are the new norm. Disturbingly so. It’s a train wreck, and a serious disservice is being done to students.

The show, which features 10 canvases and 13 works on paper, is a small selection from a gift that the artist made to the museum, including 74 of her paintings and 104 of her drawings. Kleefeld art is now about 6% of the museum’s permanent collection. (I’m unaware of its presence in any other museum’s collection.) Her own art will rotate in her dedicated gallery. Also donated were her library, a personal archive and copies of more than 20 inspirational books she has written.

Did I mention the $10-million check? That came too.

------------------

In the Kleefeld paintings in the Kleefeld gallery at the Kleefeld museum, what makes the “well of being” so peculiar is that the art is frankly terrible — by far the worst I’ve seen on display in a serious exhibition venue, public or private, for profit or nonprofit, in years.



https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2022-06-13/kleefeld-art-museum-csulb-commentary

some of her art





9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Commentary: The artist in CSULB's new exhibit is a major donor. That's bad, and so is the art (Original Post) Demovictory9 Jun 2022 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author exboyfil Jun 2022 #1
Derivative. brush Jun 2022 #2
Breathtaking, priceless, stunning dalton99a Jun 2022 #3
some are very Picasso like Demovictory9 Jun 2022 #6
Speaking of museums kowtowing to rich donors... LudwigPastorius Jun 2022 #4
wow. money talks Demovictory9 Jun 2022 #5
quite basquiat-ish. some catchy pix. not as awful as some would make it nt msongs Jun 2022 #7
"It's a train wreck, and a serious disservice is being done to students". Igel Jun 2022 #8
I visited the Henry Gallery at UW every time they had a new exhibition. maxsolomon Jun 2022 #9

Response to Demovictory9 (Original post)

LudwigPastorius

(9,233 posts)
4. Speaking of museums kowtowing to rich donors...
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 02:28 PM
Jun 2022

The Dallas Museum of Art has long had an exhibition of the art donated by socialite Wendy Reeves.

The only stipulation was that it had to display the paintings, furniture, sculptures, and textiles exactly as she had arranged them in her French chateau.

So, the DMA built an exact 6 room, 16,000 square foot replica of her house.

Sheesh!





Igel

(35,383 posts)
8. "It's a train wreck, and a serious disservice is being done to students".
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 07:23 PM
Jun 2022

Two points.

(1) How many students frequent these things?

I know that I attended a university with an art gallery for 7 years (grad life) and never (a) visited the gallery or (b) heard of anybody that visited the gallery. Now, had I been in engineering that might be meaningless (yeah, I'm stereotyping), but this was humanities.

Did I mention this was over the course of 7 years?

(2) When did the exhibit open and when does it close?

If it opened in early June and closes in early August, how many students are going to be on campus to be disserviced by its being?

If that's it, it's a good price--think of it not as a $10 million donation but a $9.9 million donation with a $100k gallery rental fee.

maxsolomon

(33,449 posts)
9. I visited the Henry Gallery at UW every time they had a new exhibition.
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 08:03 PM
Jun 2022

during my years there. I go back frequently. I like Art.

The Henry was founded in 1926 as Washington State's first art museum by Seattle entrepreneur Horace C. Henry on the principle that art stimulates inquiry, fosters knowledge, and builds a healthy community. Henry donated the collection he built with his late wife Susan of 178 works of art, along with funds for construction. The Henry Art Gallery opened to the public on February 10, 1927.


This is simply how you butter up big Donors. It's craven, and it's everywhere.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Commentary: The artist in...