Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEgg on the face of the WSJ: "The Capitol 'Reconnaissance' Smear"
The Capitol Reconnaissance Smear
The Jan. 6 committee indulged a false and partisan accusation.
By The Editorial Board
If the Jan. 6 select committee wants to have more bipartisan credibility, how about apologizing to Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk ? The Republican was vindicated this week after false accusations that he had provided reconnaissance tours for Capitol rioters.
...The Georgia Representative did escort constituents, but cameras show they toured House office buildingswhich are separate from the Capitol. Mr. Manger confirmed that at no time did the group appear in any tunnels that would have led them to the U.S. Capitol, adding that we train our officers on being alert for people conducting surveillance or reconnaissance, and we do not consider any of the activities we observed as suspicious.
The press is downplaying this humiliation by noting the Jan. 6 committee letter also referred to tours of House and Senate office buildings, which is part of the Capitol complex. Cmon, man. The Sherrill allegation was that Republicans had given tours of the Capitol to give rioters advance intel of the layout.
The Jan. 6 committee could have checked the facts with the Capitol police before it smeared Mr. Loudermilk. The least it can do now is admit it was wrong and apologize. As for Ms. Sherrill, the lesson is not to believe anything she says.
The Jan. 6 committee indulged a false and partisan accusation.
By The Editorial Board
If the Jan. 6 select committee wants to have more bipartisan credibility, how about apologizing to Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk ? The Republican was vindicated this week after false accusations that he had provided reconnaissance tours for Capitol rioters.
...The Georgia Representative did escort constituents, but cameras show they toured House office buildingswhich are separate from the Capitol. Mr. Manger confirmed that at no time did the group appear in any tunnels that would have led them to the U.S. Capitol, adding that we train our officers on being alert for people conducting surveillance or reconnaissance, and we do not consider any of the activities we observed as suspicious.
The press is downplaying this humiliation by noting the Jan. 6 committee letter also referred to tours of House and Senate office buildings, which is part of the Capitol complex. Cmon, man. The Sherrill allegation was that Republicans had given tours of the Capitol to give rioters advance intel of the layout.
The Jan. 6 committee could have checked the facts with the Capitol police before it smeared Mr. Loudermilk. The least it can do now is admit it was wrong and apologize. As for Ms. Sherrill, the lesson is not to believe anything she says.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-capitol-reconnaissance-smear-jan-6-committee-barry-loudermilk-mikie-sherrill-11655244928
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1321 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Egg on the face of the WSJ: "The Capitol 'Reconnaissance' Smear" (Original Post)
mia
Jun 2022
OP
Walleye
(30,982 posts)1. C'mon Wall Street Journal, try to be journalists
The letter to Loudermilk specifically stated the Capitol complex. Are we going to let these assholes get away with their technicality mentality.
bottomofthehill
(8,318 posts)2. When you see the video, you may want to re-think that WSJ
I have taken a lot of insider threat training, this looks like a classic case of exactly what should be reported. Taking Photos of Security Check Points. taking pictures of multiple entrances and exits to the Capitol and then, the person shows up armed the next day as a "Leader" in a group that came to over throw government.
intheflow
(28,443 posts)3. C'mon, man. The J6 Committee has receipts
and the video. WSJ looks like it's run by idiots who think they know it all but wait!! There's a video for this.
Vinca
(50,237 posts)4. What tourist doesn't want photos of the stairways and security checkpoints? Sheesh.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)5. What do you expect from the editorial board of a Rupert Murdoch rag?
The truth? Good luck with that.