Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(50,957 posts)
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:00 PM Jun 2022

Mom confronts Betsy DeVos about mandatory internal genital inspections for children to play sports



Tweet text:

Red Wine and Blue
@RedWineBlueUSA
Nothing like a mom taking a stand. Watch @katiebparis ask Betsy DeVos about mandatory internal genital inspections for children to play sports, just passed by Republicans in the Ohio House. DeVos dodges, but watch till the end when Katie corners the GOP leader of the Ohio Senate.


Watch on Twitter
3:17 PM · Jun 15, 2022
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mom confronts Betsy DeVos about mandatory internal genital inspections for children to play sports (Original Post) Nevilledog Jun 2022 OP
What a terrible violation of any child n/t Ruby Zee Jun 2022 #1
Sometimes I can't believe how sick these people are Walleye Jun 2022 #2
Speaking of groomers... dlk Jun 2022 #3
+1 2naSalit Jun 2022 #5
Does she still have a federal position? I thought the PO was the only agency captain queeg Jun 2022 #4
Not that my last 20 minutes on Google can find. Igel Jun 2022 #10
There is a sickness upon the land . . . Aussie105 Jun 2022 #6
Clearly the genital checks are insane. But, if I had a girl competing against another kid who was dutch777 Jun 2022 #7
For children, playing a game? Why does it need genital-inspection level of competitiveness? NCLefty Jun 2022 #8
Depends on age. Igel Jun 2022 #11
Letting kids play on the team of their gender, whether trans or cis, is the fairest. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2022 #9

Walleye

(30,912 posts)
2. Sometimes I can't believe how sick these people are
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:13 PM
Jun 2022

And she sits there and says it in this matter of fact tone like there’s nothing absolutely wrong with checking little girls private parts. Jesus

captain queeg

(10,075 posts)
4. Does she still have a federal position? I thought the PO was the only agency
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:17 PM
Jun 2022

Still needing a house cleaning.

Igel

(35,268 posts)
10. Not that my last 20 minutes on Google can find.
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:56 PM
Jun 2022

No federal position, no polical or government position in OH. No residency in OH.

No reason I can find for headlining the name, apart from ... ?

Perhaps 21 minutes' rummaging would have turned up something relevant.

Aussie105

(5,308 posts)
6. There is a sickness upon the land . . .
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:19 PM
Jun 2022

Some people see it, are horrified, and fight it.

Others revel in it, and perpetuate it. Right, Betsy? (She has to go.)

dutch777

(2,958 posts)
7. Clearly the genital checks are insane. But, if I had a girl competing against another kid who was
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:25 PM
Jun 2022

born male but now declaring female under whatever conditions, depending on the sport, I would wonder if my girl has a fair chance. I would love to have everyone have a chance to compete, especially as a kid, but I can't reason out the true level of fairness in many sports. I probably haven't read enough, so please before you torch me, I do want to understand but this seems incredibly complex to meet a threshold that is truly FAIR TO ALL.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
8. For children, playing a game? Why does it need genital-inspection level of competitiveness?
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 07:28 PM
Jun 2022

Sports are never fair anyway. People cheat their assess off constantly. Betting corrupts it regularly.

Why can't we just let kids play?

Igel

(35,268 posts)
11. Depends on age.
Wed Jun 15, 2022, 08:07 PM
Jun 2022

If you're a junior and colleges are out looking good in front of college recruiters, it can mean full-ride or no-ride to a school. Maybe good, maybe not.

Ever have a student who's working class offered a full-ride scholarship at a decent school, one that his (or her) single-mom parent couldn't have afforded without significant debt for parent and student?

Had a student once given a scholarship worth $100k. That was years ago. Another got a scholarship at a school with $35k/year tuition--4 years, $140k. My house was valued at $99k when my wife and I bought it. (I guess for some, $140,000 is chump change.)

Another, a 20-year-old sophomore, AA, single mother, got a free-ride worth far, far more than $140k after somehow, in 10 weeks, he became a "legit" senior and graduated. Phenomenal track athlete. (But really? A 20-year-old sophomore? And he was recruited?)

You're in 1st grade? Meh. Who cares. Vicissitudes and all that.

You're a junior or senior? Not only the integrity of the sport matters, but something intelligible--$ and pride. (1) Not $10k, but $100k. And more. (2) Not "oh, well," but, "you've been unfair to me!" Like *that* doesn't matter!

High school sports, by the way--not much in the way of betting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mom confronts Betsy DeVos...