General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot trying to be snarky but I have an honest question. If someone who is anti-abortion is revealed
to have had an abortion, do some here think this is off limits to bring up the hypocrisy because you feel this is "slut-shaming"? If so, is there any instance where it would not be slut shaming to you, to point out the hypocrisy? Where is the line drawn or are all who had abortions but suggest abortion is evil off limits to criticism because you feel it's a sensitive and private matter? Again, just trying to understand where you draw the line or where you see the line being crossed.
This would also go for politicians and religious figures who say prostitution is an evil sin but then indulge in the behavior they say is sinful.
As far as I could see, pretty much 100% of DU members posting were very careful not to slut shame on the Boerbert story and went out of there way to only point at the hypocrisy angle. The press release made this distinction as well.
Since the Boebert story is un-substantiated at this point, this post isn't about her and I hope posters can stay focused on the hypothetical situation I laid out above.
I am not going to argue with anyone. I am just interested in the responses and if perhaps there is something I am not being sensitive to. Trying to keep an open mind as the story seemed to upset a number of people.
RainCaster
(10,869 posts)Has had an abortion in their past. No exceptions.
walkingman
(7,606 posts)SKKY
(11,804 posts)...her own personal guilt for choosing her military career over becoming a single mother in the military. So, I don't have a large sample size, but I do know she still votes fairly consistently for Democrats so who knows.
onecaliberal
(32,852 posts)Fake morals for others to live by while they actually stand for nothing. Theyre vapid and soulless. There is no bottom. NO BOTTOM.
Skittles
(153,156 posts)I absolutely agree; yes INDEED.
brooklynite
(94,519 posts)...which assumes that someone has actual evidence of what the "Muckrakers PAC" has alleged.
keithbvadu2
(36,788 posts)The only moral abortion is my abortion
https://tinyurl.com/2j8xu8km
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)https://www.motherjones.com/mojo-wire/2022/06/lauren-boebert-sexism-abortion-rumors/
Stop Spreading Those Deeply Misogynistic Rumors About Lauren Boebert
Sure, one could call Boebert a hypocrite for allegedly having abortions despite publicly opposing them. But accusing Boebert of having done sex work and gotten abortions involves an obvious layer of contempt, of shaming a woman for things that she shouldnt have to be ashamed ofespecially when theres no shortage of actually shameful things to talk about.
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,009 posts)The fact that these dropped before Republican primaries and the PAC is endorsing their primary opponents lends credence to them being more about the behavior than the hypocrisy..
grumpyduck
(6,232 posts)AFAIC, that's her own business. But if she's opposing it now for political purposes, as alleged, then she's a fucking hypocrite.
I would say the same about anyone else doing one thing and then making an issue of opposing it for political purposes. At least have the decency to admit you changed your mind about it.
Still... where's the proof?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,853 posts)Anyone who has had an abortion who now wants to deny that to others, is a hypocrite. A dishonest hypocrite.
Some years ago I read a piece about a woman who had had something like six or seven abortions, and who now thought that that no woman should ever be able to have one. I was outraged. Just because you made a whole lot of bad choices, doesn't mean you get to restrict other women from making good or appropriate choices.
If you've had an abortion, if you claim to have been opposed to abortion but then when your daughter turned up pregnant and you offered her the abortion possibility, then you are pro-choice. Even though you don't get it. Being opposed to abortion until a young woman close to you needs one simply shows your hypocrisy.
I'm old enough that I came of age before Roe v Wade, and so I get it in ways younger people simply don't. I remember various home abortion things, some of which ended the pregnancy, most of which didn't. Others of which ended the pregnancy, but rendered the woman infertile. There is a reason a lot of Hollywood stars wound up adopting. Think about it.
Oh, and I remember the hypocrisy of a young, pregnant woman going to a group of doctors and stating that yes, if she had to stay pregnant she'd kill herself. I remember those who could afford it sending their teenage daughter to Hawaii to get an abortion there.
I don't know if it's still true, but a couple of decades ago I read that in Brazil, some huge number of maternity ward beds, up to 50%, were occupied by women who'd had illegal abortions.
Walleye
(31,017 posts)But the GOP has already told us that a pregnant woman has no right to privacy
canetoad
(17,153 posts)Until they go public, as a US member of congress and use an extremely dubious religious reason to ban that right to almost every other woman or childbearing age.
Walleye
(31,017 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)rabidly anti abortion. I'll leave it to the barroom shrinks to explain it, but it is verfiable phenomenon.
MuseRider
(34,107 posts)They did what they did for whatever reason they had at the time. Why does anyone care how they felt at any certain time? If they tell you, listen and accept it otherwise it is none of your business to call them anything.
Times and situations change and that is NO business of anyone to judge no matter who they are and no matter what they may say later.
Slut shaming? Really? So they had one and then decided nobody else should makes her a slut? Changing her mind makes her a slut? Why is that horrible term even seen here under any circumstances? Horrible people can be just as horrible without the sexist name calling.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)patricia92243
(12,595 posts)the past?
Slut shaming is never appropriate.
Kaleva
(36,297 posts)So your post is about her.
One of two things will happen here. The stories will be verified and Boebert will rightly be called out for hypocrisy or the reports will be found false and those who used what turned out be be lies to attack will be exposed to similiar charges. The truth doesn't matter if points can be made.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,329 posts)in general.
Samrob
(4,298 posts)and then had to resign when their extramarital children and affairs were exposed? or the GOP homophobic Congressmen who were caught soliciting young boys on Capitol Hill. When can one call a thing a thing?
Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)This whole thing just keeps bringing this bit to mind, the shallowness of the obsession with hypocrisy.
(There's some mild language, and it's about Bill Cosby's rape convictions).
Norm was a legend.
Novara
(5,841 posts)So stripping women of bodily autonomy while being an utter hypocrite about it is distasteful to some?
Suck it up, Buttercup.
If you're taking my rights away and telling me it's a "moral" thing while you indulged in the same rights you're now taking away, I'ma call you out on your hypocrisy.
I don't give a shit what she did to be pregnant. The very idea that she ended pregnancies yet pushes a holier-than-thou restriction on other women makes her a fucking hypocrite and hell yes, she should be called out on it. It's the same for any legislator who passes anti-gay legislation and is exposed as gay. It's the hypocrisy.