Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Flo Mingo

(492 posts)
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:02 AM Jun 2022

Did Grassley give away the game?

It's pure speculation on my part but I do wonder if Grassley's statement on the 5th that he, not VP would certify the results of the election, had anything to do with Pence refusing to get into the SS car when they wanted to evacuate him from the Capitol.

Surely Pence would have been made aware of Grassley's statement. Whether Pence knew the ultimate goal for J5 or not, how did Grassley's statement influence VP's actions on J5?

51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Grassley give away the game? (Original Post) Flo Mingo Jun 2022 OP
Does anyone have the actual quote? CrackityJones75 Jun 2022 #1
Here is a contemporary article from the Iowa Capital Dispatch csziggy Jun 2022 #19
Grassley, "... if the Vice President isn't there and we don't expect him to be there ..." Botany Jun 2022 #30
What? He said this J5? AllyCat Jun 2022 #36
Did you notice this part? AntiFascist Jun 2022 #48
Yep, if they had gotten Pence out of the Capitol and Grassley took over thing would be different csziggy Jun 2022 #49
He was not supposed to say that.... kentuck Jun 2022 #2
They are so used to saying the quiet part out loud live love laugh Jun 2022 #47
As more comes out, the more unlikely it seems to me that we can genuinely... SKKY Jun 2022 #3
Wouldn't it be awesome if Pence is a surprise witness at the hearing today? BlueBloodedAmerican Jun 2022 #4
So... My thoughts on this... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #5
Thanks for sharing Flo Mingo Jun 2022 #9
So... What do we know... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #17
As for that gallows prop... Wednesdays Jun 2022 #20
Absolutely... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #22
Yes, the gallows were for intimidation purposes, but that is the point. colorado_ufo Jun 2022 #23
I think most of the mob had no idea what was going to happen... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #26
I wonder if the committee will have anything from Quayle? LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #29
I suspect not... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #34
Some of those capitol rioters don't even know how lucky they got sboatcar Jun 2022 #43
If Grassley is innocent he can come in and testify to clear it all up Walleye Jun 2022 #6
Grassley knew about the coup, obviously. Eyeball_Kid Jun 2022 #8
Yes. It seems they achieved some sort of critical mass in stupidity Walleye Jun 2022 #10
In a perfect world Flo Mingo Jun 2022 #15
Grassley is a corrupt hack. madaboutharry Jun 2022 #7
I think Grassley couldn't pass up the chance to show how important he was... Frustratedlady Jun 2022 #12
This is probably the most spot-on analysis of Grassley I've read n/t Flo Mingo Jun 2022 #18
Sounds about right. calimary Jun 2022 #21
I agree rockfordfile Jun 2022 #13
I don't know JustAnotherGen Jun 2022 #11
Anything is quite possible... PCIntern Jun 2022 #14
The coup was engineered so that everyone knew but no one was responsible bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #16
IMHO Grassley thought he was a Player in this and his ego got tweaked. Ford_Prefect Jun 2022 #24
yup. He made the right decision, for whatever reasons. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #37
Other than Kinzinger and Cheney are there any Repugs who aren't Insurrectionists?? NoMoreRepugs Jun 2022 #25
"Other than Kinzinger and Cheney are there any Repugs who aren't Insurrectionists??" BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #33
Wonder how many of the 59 have moved into the Insurrectionist camp for fear of being primaried? NoMoreRepugs Jun 2022 #41
I expect a bunch weren't running again BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #42
Game, Set, and Match Schmice3 Jun 2022 #27
Yes, and I hope the Jan 6th committee gets into this-- so important LymphocyteLover Jun 2022 #28
1+ keithbvadu2 Jun 2022 #31
Well, Chump gave away the game when he told Mike Pence everything FakeNoose Jun 2022 #32
Too bad they can't be jailed for failing to expose the plot. Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2022 #51
Could be. It was a very wise decision. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #35
Coup-Coup for for fascism? czarjak Jun 2022 #38
Grassley is old as dirt, he probably had a slip of tongue. Emile Jun 2022 #39
I think VP Pence dodged a bullet Handler Jun 2022 #40
K&R Emile Jun 2022 #44
Grassley is 88 years old, anything is possible. Emile Jun 2022 #45
Doddering old Grassley ymetca Jun 2022 #46
yup demtenjeep Jun 2022 #50
 

CrackityJones75

(2,403 posts)
1. Does anyone have the actual quote?
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:08 AM
Jun 2022

I want to see it.

Edit: nevermind that’s right he said “We don’t expect Pence to be there”

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
19. Here is a contemporary article from the Iowa Capital Dispatch
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:26 AM
Jun 2022
Grassley suggests he may preside over Senate debate on Electoral College votes
By: Linh Ta - January 5, 2021 12:46 pm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

During an exchange with reporters on Tuesday, Grassley was asked how he plans to vote.

“Well, first of all, I will be — if the Vice President isn’t there and we don’t expect him to be there, I will be presiding over the Senate,” according to a transcript of his remarks sent by a spokesperson.

Grassley serves as the president pro tempore of the Senate and will preside over any portion of the debate that Pence does not attend. But Grassley expects Pence to be present on Wednesday, according to his spokesperson.

https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2021/01/05/grassley-suggests-he-may-preside-over-senate-debate-on-electoral-college-votes/


(Emphasis added by me)

Botany

(70,449 posts)
30. Grassley, "... if the Vice President isn't there and we don't expect him to be there ..."
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 12:10 PM
Jun 2022

Grassley was in on "it."

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
48. Did you notice this part?
Fri Jun 17, 2022, 02:19 AM
Jun 2022
Both Grassley and Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst have acknowledged Biden as the winner of the election, based on “the Constitution,” according to the Des Moines Register, but haven’t ruled out raising objections. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he acknowledges Biden as the winner of the election.

Grassley told reporters on Tuesday that any challenges to the election results are a “legitimate” move that Republicans are allowed to conduct, according to Radio Iowa.

“First of all, it’s a legal process under the law and under the Constitution, for these folks to do what they’re doing,” Grassley says. “It was done by the Democrats in 2004 and I think one other time. People that are finding fault with Republicans doing it shouldn’t do it when it’s done by Democrats.”

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
49. Yep, if they had gotten Pence out of the Capitol and Grassley took over thing would be different
Fri Jun 17, 2022, 11:07 AM
Jun 2022

From the way Grassley worded that, he knew the arguments TGF's attorneys were given for over turning the election - even though the attorneys had been told it was not legitimate.

Grassley was in on the coup planning.

live love laugh

(13,081 posts)
47. They are so used to saying the quiet part out loud
Fri Jun 17, 2022, 01:44 AM
Jun 2022

because they know it’ll probably never be heard.

Even now this is not reaching as many as it should.

SKKY

(11,797 posts)
3. As more comes out, the more unlikely it seems to me that we can genuinely...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:10 AM
Jun 2022

...get to the honest truth about what happened without taking Mike Pence's deposition.

Ohio Joe

(21,733 posts)
5. So... My thoughts on this...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:24 AM
Jun 2022

I believe Grassley knew before hand much of what was going to happen. I've not seen evidence that would stand up in court but I think he absolutely knew.

We know for certain (and I believe will see evidence today) that Pence knew full well TFG wanted the count stopped. I have a feeling (but do not know for certain) that Pence was kept out of much of what was going to happen on 1/6 since they knew he was not going along with the plan. I don't think he knew the PB's/OK's were going to do their recon and then work to get the crowd flowing into the Capitol... Or even anything about the PB/OK involvement.

Once the Capitol was breached and Pence taken to the basement, I think he began putting things together. When the SS tried to get him out of there, (And I expect that was SOP and not that they were 'in on it' as I've seen suggested), I think he had a moment of clarity and decided he was not going to help TFG end American democracy.

Flo Mingo

(492 posts)
9. Thanks for sharing
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:47 AM
Jun 2022

The earliest record I can find of Pence publicly stating he would ignore alternate electors was on the 6th, just prior to the 1pm start of congress convening to certify the election.

"Shortly before the 1 p.m. start of the joint session and even as Trump continued his verbal haranguing, Pence made clear in a three-page letter that he would follow the Constitution, not the commander in chief."

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-pences-full-letter-saying-he-cant-claim-unilateral-authority-to-reject-electoral-votes

Grassley's statement was on the 5th.
Did others already know Pence's intent? Is that how the gallows were ready before the public knew what VPs intent was?

Ohio Joe

(21,733 posts)
17. So... What do we know...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:19 AM
Jun 2022

We know Pence talked to Quayle in December about if he could reject the electors:

Quayle was in some ways a proto-Pence. A vice president from Indiana, Quayle was a younger conservative brought onto the ticket to bolster the bona fides of a presidential candidate whose own record was less than impressive to some on the right. It makes sense that Pence called Quayle when deciding how to respond to Trump’s demands.

Costa and Woodward report that Pence rang up Quayle in late December to ask if there was any way he could give Trump want he wanted, according to the Washington Post:

Quayle was adamant, according to the authors. “Mike, you have no flexibility on this. None. Zero. Forget it. Put it away,” he said.

But Pence pressed him, the authors write, asking if there were any grounds to pause the certification because of ongoing legal challenges. Quayle was unmoved, and Pence ultimately agreed, according to the book.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/dan-quayle-talked-mike-pence-rejecting-trump-what-story-n1279406

So he knew then that TFG wanted him to do it.

We know Pence talked to Greg Jacob on 1/5 and Jacob told him to forget it:

A lawyer for former Vice President Mike Pence told him the day before the Capitol Riot that following former President Donald Trump's request to certify the election for him would eventually fail in court, according to a memo obtained by Politico.

https://news.yahoo.com/lawyer-pence-told-him-day-142757454.html

As for the gallows... My opinion is that they were for show only... See this pics here:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216719811#post12

But yes, others 100% knew that Pence was not on board... See TFG's speech at the Ellipse on 1/6.

Wednesdays

(17,321 posts)
20. As for that gallows prop...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:36 AM
Jun 2022

it wasn't needed to "hang Mike Pence." There were a gazillion other ways the mob could have accomplished that.

Ohio Joe

(21,733 posts)
22. Absolutely...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:39 AM
Jun 2022

The mob was out for blood and certainly would have killed any rep/The VP/Aide/etc. they came across... No gallows needed.

colorado_ufo

(5,730 posts)
23. Yes, the gallows were for intimidation purposes, but that is the point.
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:40 AM
Jun 2022

Everything was planned and intentional - no sudden riot. Nobody travels with a gallows in their car trunk along with a can of Fix-A-Flat and jumper cables, "just in case." Everything was planned, and Pence was the special target, per instructions from TFG.

Ohio Joe

(21,733 posts)
26. I think most of the mob had no idea what was going to happen...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:46 AM
Jun 2022

When I look at the fact that the PB's/OK's scouted the best way in based on the direction the crowd would be coming, and made sure to get the Capitol police blocking that route out of there... All timed to the end of TFG's speech where he intentionally sent them on the path... Yup, planned but the mob were tools. Things like the gallows, the people with megaphones egging them on, etc., I agree, pre-planned and part of the set up group who were part of the coup.

Ohio Joe

(21,733 posts)
34. I suspect not...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 12:46 PM
Jun 2022

I'd not be shocked to see the quote presented but since there is no debate from anyone about the call or what was said... And since there is no reporting of them talking to him... I'm not expecting that to happen.

sboatcar

(415 posts)
43. Some of those capitol rioters don't even know how lucky they got
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 01:40 PM
Jun 2022

That Mike Pence got down the hallway just very shortly before they did. Had they spotted him and started charging I imagine there would have been a LOT of bloodshed, and things would have gone sideways in a way that could have been very, very bad.

Eyeball_Kid

(7,429 posts)
8. Grassley knew about the coup, obviously.
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:46 AM
Jun 2022

And he's one of a growing number of GOPers who should be indicted as co-conspirators. It's likely that over half of all GOPers in Congress were complicit, and therefore were co-conspirators. If Garland and the DOJ are true to their word, no one will be spared exposure and prosecutions.

Flo Mingo

(492 posts)
15. In a perfect world
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:19 AM
Jun 2022

I have no idea how this will all turn out and who will be held accountable and who will escape unscathed. But I'm sure if R's control either house of Congress after midterms, it's much less likely that truth or justice will prevail.

madaboutharry

(40,190 posts)
7. Grassley is a corrupt hack.
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 10:27 AM
Jun 2022

No one should doubt he at the very least was willing to go along with the plot.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
12. I think Grassley couldn't pass up the chance to show how important he was...
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:00 AM
Jun 2022

He was more interested in letting people know he would step into the position instead of Pence and complete the certification.

He has a problem with importance and power. Being a wimp at heart, he has to work harder than most.

Ford_Prefect

(7,873 posts)
24. IMHO Grassley thought he was a Player in this and his ego got tweaked.
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 11:40 AM
Jun 2022

Whatever they had planned to do with Pence the VP already knew they were up to illegal moves and had gone on the record against it. Mike knew that if he left the building Congress could not complete the count. He had that detailed report from his lawyer explaining what was viable, what was not and what was clearly illegal. He'd heard Judge Luton's opinion. Mike may be just a notch above Dan Qualye on the IQ scale but he understood that there are rules by which government works and there is a structure and a sequence to them.

There are times when the role thrust upon you makes you do what must be done. I don't view Pence as a hero but I think he figured out there was only one way to stop Trump and his gang of thieves. He may well have understood that if Trump wasn't stopped it would be bad not only for the country but for the future of Mike Pence, too.

BumRushDaShow

(128,527 posts)
33. "Other than Kinzinger and Cheney are there any Repugs who aren't Insurrectionists??"
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 12:42 PM
Jun 2022

In the House, there were a total of 147 repukes (8 Senate/138 House) who objected to PA's certification and that included 8 of the 9 GOP Congressnuts from here in PA. The lone one among that group of PA's GOP seditionists who didn't was Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-1), who is in a swing district, where the minute he goes loon, he'll be thrown out.

There were 197 Republicans in the House before the 2020 election, so with the 138 who signed on as insurrectionists, that left 59 who didn't vote that way.

NoMoreRepugs

(9,374 posts)
41. Wonder how many of the 59 have moved into the Insurrectionist camp for fear of being primaried?
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 01:05 PM
Jun 2022

My guess is retire - 'convert' or DIE at election time.

BumRushDaShow

(128,527 posts)
42. I expect a bunch weren't running again
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 01:15 PM
Jun 2022

and I believe that almost 1/2 of those were part of a group of consistent "moderate" Republicans who were in swing districts (around 25 or so).

FakeNoose

(32,599 posts)
32. Well, Chump gave away the game when he told Mike Pence everything
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 12:30 PM
Jun 2022

He probably told Bill Barr everything too - and they both refused to go along with it.

So how's come neither of those guys opened their mouths? They just kept quiet and went about their business, as if a coup of the US Government wasn't about to happen.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
51. Too bad they can't be jailed for failing to expose the plot.
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 04:09 AM
Jun 2022

Instead, they want to be congratulated as heroes.

ymetca

(1,182 posts)
46. Doddering old Grassley
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 08:56 PM
Jun 2022

...someone should be checking his bank accounts.

What puzzles me more is who planted those pipe bombs the night before? I wouldn't be surprised if Flynn was behind that. He knows people, I'm sure.

Planned chaos, so TFG could declare "Marshall Law", a la MTG. A bunch of ex-mil gun nuts throwing in as the "legitimate militia".

Chaos was the last ditch effort to stay in power.

It will be wild!

Sickening. All of it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Grassley give away th...