Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Novara

(5,841 posts)
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 05:58 PM Jun 2022

Jan. 6 committee asks Ginni Thomas, wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, to testify

Jan. 6 committee asks Ginni Thomas, wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, to testify

The House Jan. 6 committee sent a letter to Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, asking for her to speak to the committee in the wake of reporting by the Washington Post that the committee has evidence of Thomas communicating with lawyer John Eastman.

Committee Chair Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., told reporters after the committee's Thursday hearing that it had made the request of Ginni Thomas, but did not say when the letter had been sent.

Eastman was central to a pressure campaign against then-Vice President Pence to reject the election results when Congress convened on Jan. 6 to count the Electoral College vote, Thompson and Vice Chair Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., say. Thompson told this to reporters on Capitol Hill and Cheney's view was confirmed to NPR's Deirdre Walsh by an aide.

Ginni Thomas told the right-wing news site The Daily Caller in a story published after the start of Thursday's hearing that she would "look forward" to speaking with the committee.


More: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/16/1105543882/jan-6-committee-ginni-thomas
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jan. 6 committee asks Ginni Thomas, wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, to testify (Original Post) Novara Jun 2022 OP
She should remember that VMA131Marine Jun 2022 #1
I believe you've been called, Mrs. Justice Thomas gratuitous Jun 2022 #2
That's a nice gesture. Have the subpoena ready. dem4decades Jun 2022 #3
Interesting development. This could lead to a stampede of those trying to distance themselves. captain queeg Jun 2022 #4
Could ginni thomas, somehow, be our . . . Martha Mitchell of Watergate fame/ empedocles Jun 2022 #5
No. Martha Mitchell was a positive force. lastlib Jun 2022 #8
Not even close. Ginni's a crook. vanlassie Jun 2022 #10
but can she . . . shut herself up? empedocles Jun 2022 #13
Martha was a victim. vanlassie Jun 2022 #14
I expect her to double down bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #6
You know she will. crickets Jun 2022 #9
They *asked*?? lastlib Jun 2022 #7
Pure speculation, but that letter could have gone out a week or more ago, for all we know Mr. Ected Jun 2022 #11
Given that she is so much against the rule of law Buckeyeblue Jun 2022 #12

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. I believe you've been called, Mrs. Justice Thomas
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:00 PM
Jun 2022
Thread here about how much "Ginni" would like to be called before the committee.

Time to show your cards.

captain queeg

(10,187 posts)
4. Interesting development. This could lead to a stampede of those trying to distance themselves.
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:11 PM
Jun 2022

Not like she’ll ever get prosecuted but I’m sure her and Clarence are worried about their reputations and “legacy”.

lastlib

(23,224 posts)
8. No. Martha Mitchell was a positive force.
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:21 PM
Jun 2022

Ginni is not.

Martha wanted the truth known. Ginni wants to hide it.

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
13. but can she . . . shut herself up?
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 08:18 PM
Jun 2022

Also, Martha in later accounts, was against her ex. Not truth, justice, and the American way.

lastlib

(23,224 posts)
7. They *asked*??
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:19 PM
Jun 2022

It should've been "Get your ass in that witness chair and take the oath. Right. F'in'. Now."

"If you're not here forthwith, we're sendin' the boyz for you."

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
11. Pure speculation, but that letter could have gone out a week or more ago, for all we know
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:46 PM
Jun 2022

She may have demurred their kindly request.

The Committee wants the public to know that she's been asked politely to join them for a chat.

That way, they avoid the appearance of abruptly serving her with a subpoena without any prior announcement to the public.

As with everything they've done, it wouldn't be hard to imagine that this is how professionals operate.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
12. Given that she is so much against the rule of law
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 07:01 PM
Jun 2022

I can't help but think that she leaked Alito's abortion opinion. It just stinks of her. She wanted to let her people know where everyone stood as of the draft for 2 reasons. 1--to keep the pressure on everyone to hold their ground. 2--to have a pre-victory victory lap.

The Thomas's are not good people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jan. 6 committee asks Gin...