General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn entire classroom was massacred with an AR-15 just 280 miles from this stage, and the Texas GOP is
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
calguy
(5,307 posts)In It to Win It
(8,250 posts)99% super political RWNJs.
Response to calguy (Reply #1)
erronis This message was self-deleted by its author.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)This would be the response at pretty much any GOP state convention, anywhere in the country.
It's also just the GOP. Texas is about 45% Democrats.
calguy
(5,307 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,423 posts)erronis
(15,241 posts)As far as they think, the USofA is just a big resource to be exploited. First get rid of the humans.
Irish_Dem
(47,051 posts)It really is remarkable.
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)As so many horrible details were pouring in, I was thinking about the bigger picture, and how great that day was for America's enemies from a propaganda standpoint. They will use those images for decades.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)A compromise to repeal and replace the 2nd amendment that both protects lawful gun owners and their right to self defense and their right to hunt, while also modernizing what is and is not lawful, and who can own weapons, and when they can own them.
We could sell this to gun owners by removing some of the unpopular regulations (such as the cumbersome process to obtain a sound suppressor or a short barreled rifle even when it is functionally identical to a pistol with a brace) and by cleaning up the ambiguous language of the 2nd amendment. While its true that this SCOTUS recognizes an individual right to keep and bear arms, the 2nd amendment is ambiguous enough that a future SCOTUS might not recognize that right.
By cleaning up and modernizing the language we could both protect lawful gun owners from future SCOTUS changes, and protect innocent Americans by denying easy access to firearms for criminals.