I heard this in the hearing yesterday.

[fightforfreedom]

Spineless Meadows is in discussions with the committee. That's interesting and I would bet Meadows may be in discussions with the DOJ very soon, if he isn't already.

[Walleye]

1. I am betting he's doing whatever it takes to keep his lily white ass out of jail

He is such a snake he will turn on anybody just like his boss and neither one are as clever or as smart as they think they are. Very dangerous men to have in power

[agingdem]

2. I'm pretty sure the DOJ and Meadows have had some serious chats

he's been awfully quiet unlike Bannon and Navarro ..and I'm willing to bet Mark's name is going to come up a few more times before the hearings conclude

[gab13by13]

3. Indicting a former president's chief of staff,

would set a future precedent. An institutionalist AG may be more concerned about the privilege and confidentiality between a president and his chief of staff and what harm indicting a former chief of staff would do to the institution.

[fightforfreedom]

4. Nixons chief of staff was indicted.

Theres your precedent. Haldemen went to prison.

[emulatorloo]

5. +1

How soon some DU’ers forget history.

[brush]

6. Meadows is not to be trusted as he was cooperation with the J6 Committee...

early on but stopped suddenly. Remember?

Then it came out in the last hearing that Meadows' foundation got a cool 1 million dollars from trump's fake Election Defense Fund, the scam he set up after the election to rip off 250M from his gullible supporters. Seems to me that was to stop Meadows from cooperating with the Committee.

That's a euphemistic description of what happened. Of course there's another word for that transaction. I think it's also called a bribe.

[fightforfreedom]

7. No one can trust Meadows, including Trump and his inner circle.

Meadows would back stab his own mother in order to protect himself.