General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsbucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)However, only Democrats are smart enough to get this.
Republicans and people like Susan Sarandon don't have any idea about inconsistencies.
spanone
(135,830 posts)Paladin
(28,254 posts)highplainsdem
(48,975 posts)Pluvious
(4,310 posts)He did a lot to get Gorsuch on the court, because buttering up the justices makes Katyal money (his clients pay him to get favorable decisions from SCOTUS.)
https://newrepublic.com/article/160481/neal-katyal-depravity-big-law
Grokenstein
(5,722 posts)Sure, upvote the tweet, but hold your applause for the person until you know 'em a little better.
Shipwack
(2,162 posts)calimary
(81,238 posts)Love your screen name, btw!
mjvpi
(1,388 posts)a kennedy
(29,655 posts)BlueBloodedAmerican
(117 posts)certainot
(9,090 posts)needed to create the certainty they're addicted to - what defines authoritariansm - measured sometimes with the uncertainty avoidance index or UAI
sex on the wrong brain theory says that irrational need for certianty, finality, closure is what happens when impatient satisfaction demanding reproductive impulses are directed to brain functions like logic and rational thinking - caused by right handed masturbation - and some humans have inherited a susceptibility to that mental disorder - which helped survival of their ancestors in times of conflict or favored them in civilizations that favored and selected for servitude, lack of empathy, lack of imagination, conformity, etc
roamer65
(36,745 posts)In the case of the overruling of may issue.
This is war with the garbage court.
rubbersole
(6,688 posts)Making the USA the way their grandparents had it.
ancianita
(36,053 posts)for 51% of the country, while it will honor precedent on Heller to expand killing freedoms for anyone age 18 or over.
evolves
(5,400 posts)It will be hypocritical business as usual for those bought and paid for hacks.
BMW2020RT
(139 posts)qazplm135
(7,447 posts)they don't think there is a right to an abortion and they do think there is a right to bear arms.
I think they are wrong, twice, but it's not because of a lack of consistency.
MurrayDelph
(5,294 posts)I remember Scalia releasing two opinions a day apart that used the same concept to justify to diametrically-opposed opinions.
"Original intent" is a smokescreen to reverse-engineer the answer they wanted.
Nevilledog
(51,094 posts)ZonkerHarris
(24,223 posts)Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)they try to uphold the stealing of the next election by republicans, American democracy will officially come to an end. Its our courts and its respect for the rule of law and precedent that made America the envy of the world and an economic power. Trump will have officially broken SCOTUS and America and can add them to his long list of failures.
UpInArms
(51,282 posts)Moscow Mitch
In It to Win It
(8,248 posts)Traildogbob
(8,731 posts)My first thought was states rights. But no way could I say it so powerfully and on point.
ZonkerHarris
(24,223 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)The basic reading of the Constitution is that things that are protected by the Constitution cannot be left to the states; things that are not protected by the constitution are left to the states.
There is no hypocrisy in saying some things should be left to the states and others should not.
The question at hand is, rather, whether something is or is not protected by the Constitution,.
*IF* you believe abortion is not protected by the Constitution, then it should be left to the states. That's typically been a matter of whether you accept that a right to privacy, though not explicitly stated in the Constitution, is implicit.
*IF* you believe that concealed carry IS protected by the Constitution, then it should NOT be left to the states. That's a matter of how the second amendment is interpreted.
You don't have to like (or accept) those arguments for leaving one to the states and the other not, but it is not intellectually unjustifiable or inherently inconsistent.
BidenRocks
(826 posts)I would NOT visit the US.
Lets start with boycotts of our tourism industry.
This place is too dangerous!
Enjoy your guns!
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)and are fine with that level of weirdness.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)If they are going to overrule NY state sovereignty, they are going to overrule Roe v Wade.
Lonestarblue
(9,981 posts)I fear that this radical Court will go even further than overturning Roe and leaving states to choose their own abortion laws. They have already ignored established precedents, just ruled in favor of Maine taxpayers having to support a religious school that practices and preaches hatred of LGBTQ, and now ruled that New York may not pass its own gun safety laws to protect the public. There is absolutely nothing to stop them from ruling not only to overturn Roe but also to deny states the right to allow abortion. They will go back to the 1800# when states passed laws to make abortion illegal. If that happens, we need an underground railroad for abortion.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst as the old saying goes.
AleksS
(1,665 posts)If it wasnt for double standards theyd have no standards at all.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,294 posts)ShazzieB
(16,389 posts)Guns also have more rights than school children and their teachers. Guns have more rights than anybody!
Response to ShazzieB (Reply #44)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
dchill
(38,484 posts)highplainsdem
(48,975 posts)allegorical oracle
(2,357 posts)paparush
(7,964 posts)never thought I'd live to see that again.
LymphocyteLover
(5,644 posts)Martin68
(22,794 posts)LymphocyteLover
(5,644 posts)even better.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,329 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,176 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,975 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Response to pansypoo53219 (Reply #48)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.