So if they carry guns openly how about allowing shooting off a few rounds at random next?

[BSdetect]

They need to test their weapons just in case.

Where does the crap end?

[viva la]

1. Why not?

Let's say they decide they can do this without causing any damage-- maybe they shoot down a deserted highway, or set up a target in the middle of a park.

What harm, huh? It's not their fault if every parent in the park grabs their kid and leaves, or if the merchants at the exits of that highway don't get any business because everyone is scared to drive there.

What after all is the purpose of "open carry" if you can't also "open shoot"?

[HAB911]

2. In Florida, it is legal to have a shooting range in my residential back yard already

Residents, homeowners, and lawful gun owners can not shoot firearms on the private property of homes in residential neighborhoods where the land is less than one acre.


Insanity stalks the land

[rurallib]

3. don't forget the Kill Your Neighbor laws

just squeeze off a few into your neighbor and claim you thought he was going to hurt you.

[Irish_Dem]

4. I'm waiting for mandatory carry for all men, women and children.

Yes and you have to fire your gun at random on appointed days.

Like fire drills in reverse.

[DavidDvorkin]

5. This SC might rule that that would constitute protected political speech.