General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLandlord Moves to Shut Down Lauren Boebert's Restaurant
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) could lose her gun-themed restaurant in a dispute with her new landlord, the Daily Beast reports.
A person familiar with the arrangement said the property manager felt he had a moral imperative to close the business, and had planned to lease the space to another restaurant.
https://politicalwire.com/2022/06/23/landlord-moves-to-shut-down-lauren-boeberts-restaurant/
In It to Win It
(12,526 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)building with the intention of tossing her ass is a bit questionable.
drray23
(8,650 posts)the new owner can decide to renew or not renew it.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)sort of thinking leads down dangerous paths.
drray23
(8,650 posts)in which case it can be challenged in court.
When a lease is up for renewal its a new contract that the parties don't have to enter in if one party does not want it.
peacefreak2.0
(1,044 posts)The long knives have been coming out for Boebert. American Muckrakers have been pretty busy.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)lease renewals. The lease also can have sonething to say about it.
My point is simply that buying a business to put someone out of business may be common but it's still smarmy. Even if we like the result.
AZSkiffyGeek
(12,744 posts)But I'm not sure it's a slippery slope.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Roy Rolling
(7,524 posts)Capitalism, free enterprise, and all that. It may be a terrible financial decision but capitalist-friendly politicians made the rules.
kcr
(15,522 posts)at a false equivalency.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)Just stop.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)stop. A whole lot other people seem to want to throw their "what ifs" in, though.
Texasgal
(17,237 posts)here in Austin that the owner is Vegan. She will not allow any of the businesses to sell any animal products. When she first bought the building there was a famous/beloved hamburger restaurant there. When the lease was up, they were out.
efhmc
(16,219 posts)Texasgal
(17,237 posts)No longer around, but an Austin institution for many years.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)The lease was up and owner decided not to renew.
Gore1FL
(22,896 posts)Perhaps they bought it, watched Uvalde news, and said "enough is enough with gun culture; it won't happen in our name."
I don't know. Ultimately, though, It's their money, and a lease is a lease.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Hypocrisy is about to shine bright.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)approve it 6-3.
Torchlight
(6,514 posts)call it "the free market at work."
But I'm guessing someone, somewhere is hoping to see a brand new protected class dependent only on political opinion.
brush
(61,033 posts)no matter if it's a new landlord or not...unless of course there's a clause in the lease that specifies differently. And that's highly unlikely.
And that restaurant doesn't have the best reputation...the whole gun-packing theme of it, food poisoning incidents, thousands owed to the previous landlord that it's been reported that was paid off, co-incidentally enough, right after Boebert was reimbursed for exorbitantly high campaign mileage claims... try seven time the circumference of the Earth.
Trust me, a landlord doesn't want a tenant like that.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,794 posts)cloudboy07
(351 posts)that is the law ! plus the city council in tandem! the tenant has no say so !
