Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhere is the right to eat in the Constitution?
Or the right to take a dump? Or the right to have children, exercise, take medicines, write poetry, love somebody else, etc. etc. etc.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 530 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where is the right to eat in the Constitution? (Original Post)
Goodheart
Jun 2022
OP
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)1. Presumably the Ninth Amendment.
Goodheart
(5,308 posts)2. I certainly agree...
and why doesn't that apply to a woman's right to her own body?
jimfields33
(15,703 posts)3. Nobody has fought a lawsuit trying to stop any of those things.
Thats how it begins. A lawsuit. Supremes do not chose what to rule. They rule whats in front of them.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)6. They have to give certiorari
Aristus
(66,294 posts)4. Don't give them any ideas.
Schools are already taking lunch away from students whose lunch accounts are in arrears and throwing it away. See that? We live in a country where people would rather waste food than feed a hungry child.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)5. Yes.
I do not to live back in the 1700's.