HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » So Bret presented this ch...

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:19 AM

So Bret presented this chestnut.

Kavanaugh highlights Loving and other important substantive due process in assuring the public that today’s majority decision in Dobbs leaves them untouched. “I emphasize what the Court today states: Overruling Roe does not mean the overruling of those precedents, and does not threaten or cast doubt on those precedents,” Kavanaugh wrote.


Maybe a smart person can explain to me why Mr. Kavanaugh should be taken at his word?

14 replies, 1379 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 14 replies Author Time Post
Reply So Bret presented this chestnut. (Original post)
plimsoll Jun 2022 OP
Ocelot II Jun 2022 #1
plimsoll Jun 2022 #3
Just A Box Of Rain Jun 2022 #2
plimsoll Jun 2022 #6
FBaggins Jun 2022 #8
plimsoll Jun 2022 #9
haele Jun 2022 #11
misanthrope Jun 2022 #13
roamer65 Jun 2022 #4
griffi94 Jun 2022 #5
Tomconroy Jun 2022 #7
sinkingfeeling Jun 2022 #10
Midnight Writer Jun 2022 #12
hvn_nbr_2 Jun 2022 #14

Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:20 AM

1. Did he read Thomas' concurring opinion?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:21 AM

3. The obvious response here is,

He can read?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:20 AM

2. Kavanaugh has proven to be a serial liar.

 

I'd take his comments as a signpost of what's next.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Just A Box Of Rain (Reply #2)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:22 AM

6. Right,

But Thomas did exclude Loving from his list of substantive due process items up for attack. Hmm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Reply #6)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:26 AM

8. Changing their take on substantive due process wouldn't get rid of Loving

It rests at least as much on the Equal Protection Clause.

Of course... so do most of the others listed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FBaggins (Reply #8)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:49 AM

9. Well, Loving's probably safe.

As long as Thomas is alive. He may be crooked as hell, but he's not going to place himself in legal jeopardy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Reply #9)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:56 AM

11. Unless he wants a divorce and doesn't want to split assets.

If his marriage is null and void, he can walk away with whatever he wants, and she can find her own way. That is, until he finds himself becoming 3/5ths of a person depending on the state he lives in.

Obergefell ruling was founded on Loving. If Obergefell no longer protects non-cis marriages, then Loving no longer protects "mixed race" marriages.

Because that's where he's going with his statement.

Haele

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Reply #9)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 12:34 PM

13. That would all depend on where he got married and resides

It would be easy for him to sidestep miscegenation laws. There were only 16 states where those were still on the books with Loving v. Virginia was ruled on by SCOTUS.

Plus, as we saw with the federal government's rush to protect SCOTUS judges from being exposed to protests, Thomas is part of the ruling elite. They have different laws and a different reality in a nation that ridiculously maintains itself as inherently class-free.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:21 AM

4. Another lie from Boofer boy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:21 AM

5. Except we already know that Kavanaugh is a liar.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:22 AM

7. Clarence Thomas said the opposite although he omitted

Loving from the list of substantive due process cases he would overule.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 11:55 AM

10. Didn't the liar say something similar about Roe during his co9nfirmation hearings?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 12:19 PM

12. Kavanaugh will do as he's told.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to plimsoll (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 02:12 PM

14. He's just massaging Susan Collins' "concern" with a new lie. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread