*Justice Clarence Thomas, in his concurring opinion

[elleng]

overturning Roe v. Wade, laid out a vision that fomented fears about what other rights could disappear: The same rationale that the Supreme Court used to declare there was no right to abortion, he said, should also be used to overturn cases establishing rights to contraception, same-sex consensual relations and same-sex marriage.

In the majority opinion written by Justice Samuel A. Alito, the court said that nothing in its decision “should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” Justice Thomas said he agreed with that.'

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/06/24/us/roe-wade-abortion-supreme-court

Effect on Loving v. Virginia???

[onenote]

1. Loving was based on the equal protection clause

so it would be easily distinguished by Thomas from the substantive due process-based decisions he thinks should be overruled.

[Frasier Balzov]

3. Plus he's married to a white lady.

[madaboutharry]

2. I think he is a very disturbed man.

Rep. Jeffries is right about Thomas. He is a hater.

[dalton99a]

4. Thomas is one sick fuck

Stupid, bitter, sadistic, vengeful

[vercetti2021]

5. Just fucking die already

Only way we can survive now

[Novara]

6. What's he gonna do when his marriage to a white woman is declared illegal?

[empedocles]

7. That hate-filled disaster thomas strikes again.

thomas' 'guns galore' opinion was not enough. Imagine if thomas got 'guns galore' passed in 2020.

As Judge Luttig wrote: many [Jan.6, 2021] riot defendants'' have said they knew the District of Columbia's restriction on concealed cary '' and accordingly left their guns at home.'' This ''may well have prevented a massacre that day.'' [Credit to G. Will for bringing this to my attention].

Imagine the possibilities that day: the murder of Pence & Pelosi, trump getting to use the Insurrection Act to try and perhaps succeed in seizing the Presidency, etc., etc.