Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 08:21 PM Jun 2022

Dahlia Lithwick: Justices Are Not Kings

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/06/dobbs-decision-supreme-court-legitimacy.html


Justices Are Not Kings
There is no court legitimacy without public trust in the court.
By Dahlia Lithwick
June 24, 2022 5:57 PM

snip//

Today, for the first time in constitutional history, the United States Supreme Court, by a 6–3 margin, took a fundamental constitutionally protected right away from half the population, a right around which generations of women and families have ordered their lives. Make no mistake, the same court that just 24 hours earlier had determined that the decision to carry a gun on the streets is such an essential aspect of personal liberty that states may not be permitted to regulate it has now declared that decisions about abortion, miscarriage, contraception, economic survival, child-rearing, and intimate family matters are worthy of zero solicitude. None. In their view of liberty, women were worthy of zero solicitude at the founding, and remain unworthy of it today. As Mark Joseph Stern notes, women will suffer. Some will be refused treatment for miscarriages, and some will be turned away from emergency rooms. Some will be hunted down, spied on, and prosecuted for seeking health care, medication, and autonomy. The majority glibly tells us that because the harms to these people are unknowable, they are not urgent—or at the very least, less urgent than the harms faced by people who would like to see more guns in public spaces.

But ordinary Americans do not think these harms are trivial. On Thursday, Gallup polling showed public approval for the Supreme Court to be at a historic low—25 percent. It’s a precipitous drop from the prior historic low the court received in September, which sat at about 38 percent. The six justices in the majority of Dobbs will comfort themselves that this doesn’t matter. They will tell themselves that they corrected a historical injustice and that they saved unborn babies. They will say that they have lifetime tenure in order to protect against the whims of the majorities. They will blame protesters and they will continue to blame the press. Even the much-vaunted centrism and pragmatism of Chief Justice John Roberts seems to have left the building. Notwithstanding the fact of his seemingly moderate concurrence—in joining with a majority that could not wait to do in three years what they could do in one—it is clear that he has lost his court, and that he is surely less worried about the public regard for the institution than we had believed.

snip//

The dissenters understand where to place the blame for this loss of legitimacy. Even in the notoriously collegial Supreme Court, they place it squarely, and fairly, on a majority that has spent a year proving itself unwilling to moderate tone, language, conduct, and pace in exchange for the appearance of sobriety. The “stench,” as Sotomayor once warned, will not dissipate just because the majority can’t smell it.

There will not be a glorious peace that settles over the land now that this issue has been sent back to the states, no matter how much Justice Brett Kavanaugh wants you to believe it. There will be infighting among states, and vicious criminal prosecutions, and joyous theological efforts to secure future harms for gay partners and families struggling with IVF and women seeking contraception. The people who suffer the most will be the poorest, the youngest, the sickest—the people whose interests don’t even warrant acknowledgment by the majority opinion.

The dissenters sign off in “sorrow.” It is a sentiment that is surely directed at millions of women who will suffer appallingly as a result of this ruling. But it is also sorrow for an institution that was always rooted in an idea that there had to be a relationship between the public trust and judicial power. Justices are not kings. They can demand silent reverence, but it is not assured them. There have been plenty of us warning that this relationship was in jeopardy for many years, and the warnings were dismissed as efforts to undermine the court. Today’s decision confirms that, if and when the public is finally ready to give up on the court, there will be nobody to blame but the six justices who gave them nothing to believe in.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dahlia Lithwick: Justices Are Not Kings (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2022 OP
The Trump Court is illegitimate and deserves no respect. dalton99a Jun 2022 #1
Yup. The last fig leaf has been torn off. alwaysinasnit Jun 2022 #4
They are Putin puppets. Putin installed Trump who installed the SC misfits. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #2
That's a very powerful article. Power derives from the people, that gives legitimacy to the law bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #3
Putin's Oligarchs NQCowboy68 Jun 2022 #5
I'm for term limits BlueIdaho Jun 2022 #6
That's just what I've been saying.. Cha Jun 2022 #7

bucolic_frolic

(43,146 posts)
3. That's a very powerful article. Power derives from the people, that gives legitimacy to the law
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 08:37 PM
Jun 2022

These 6 bozos belong in jail.

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
6. I'm for term limits
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 08:50 PM
Jun 2022

Across the board. Courts, Congress, you name it.

As for this court? I guess the GQP got what it paid for. Now let’s see if they like the consequences.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dahlia Lithwick: Justice...