General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClarence Thomas said he wanted to serve for 43 years to make liberals' lives 'miserable'
Who is surprised that this at least partially about aggrieved pricks getting revenge? Certainly more of them than just Thomas.https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-told-clerks-he-wants-to-make-liberals-miserable-2022-6?op=1
...
In a conversation with his law clerks two years following his confirmation, The New York Times reported Thomas expressed his desire to serve on the court until the year 2034.
"The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years," a former clerk remembered Thomas who was 43 years old when confirmed saying, according to The New York Times. "And I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years."
Thomas, considered the most conservative justice on the court, joined the majority opinion on Friday which overturned federal abortion protections established in Roe v. Wade.
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)milestogo
(16,829 posts)He is one messed up piece of garbage.
SergeStorms
(19,196 posts)Trumpanista. That's their raison d'etre.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)dalton99a
(81,455 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)Lars39
(26,109 posts)Thats enough reason for his walnut sized brain.
XanaDUer2
(10,649 posts)What was done to him
viva la
(3,286 posts)This shows how twisted his understanding of reality is.
He was born in 1948. In much of the US at that point, he wouldn't have been able to go to public schools. He wouldn't be able to go to public universities. His parents wouldn't be able to vote. His eventual marriage would be illegal.
And it was his fellow African Americans that he's spent his career scorning, and LIBERALS, who changed that so that he could become a lawyer and a judge.
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)SergeStorms
(19,196 posts)In my mind the jury is still out on what species she may be.
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)sheilahi
(277 posts)Can't help but think that maybe instead of him deciding what women can do perhaps it might be a better idea to take care of that loon he's married to.
machoneman
(4,006 posts)Lucky us, I guess....................
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)What a sad little man who really can be summed up as a pube on a Coke can.
Initech
(100,064 posts)oldsoftie
(12,531 posts)Galraedia
(5,022 posts)Like damn, a supreme court justice's own wife committed seditious conspiracy to overthrown the elected government and will of the people. You can't uphold the constitution and still sleep next to the woman who threatens the very principles you swore to uphold. He shouldn't be ruling on any case period and needs to be IMPEACHED.
bdamomma
(63,837 posts)nt
dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)Nothing would make me happier than for us liberals to make him miserable and rub his fucking nose in it. Fuck him.
machoneman
(4,006 posts)ificandream
(9,370 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,884 posts)Money trumps peace is the way of life.
OMGWTF
(3,951 posts)I havent seen that one in a long time.
Bartcop lives!!
🥃🥃✊🖖
DENVERPOPS
(8,812 posts)The common theme thru a lot of the past 40+ years was HWBush:
Head of the CIA, then running the Reagan years with Cheney and others, then running his four years with Cheney/and others,
then his CABAL, Cheney/etc running W's appointed years, that's 20 years just to start.
When HW got bounced after one term, he became Chairman of the Carlisle Group which is whole other story.
People talk about the Kennedy dynasty or the Clinton dynasty, they were nothing compared to the HWBush totally corrupt dynasty.
Reagan and W were both "appointed" through corrupt means to get into office........
irisblue
(32,969 posts)From his wiki..."He was nominated by President George W. Bush on October 31, 2005, and has served since January 31, 2006.[2]"
JanMichael
(24,885 posts)Just because Drumpf made Jeb cry doesn't make Jeb decent either.
Blue Owl
(50,351 posts)It is he who is miserable
cloudbase
(5,513 posts)is his self-described metric of what constitutes success.
Initech
(100,064 posts)Don't worry, Satan has a special circle in hell reserved just for you and Ginni!
Demovictory9
(32,449 posts)Meadowoak
(5,545 posts)2naSalit
(86,565 posts)The window to where his soul would be if he had one.
Demovictory9
(32,449 posts)rhiannon55
(2,671 posts)DBoon
(22,357 posts)Satan is waiting to reclaim his soul
plimsoll
(1,668 posts)For years I thought, "Well if heaven is full of people like you I'm not sure I see the real problem with hell." Now this.
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)make Ginny's life not just uncomfortable but miserable for the rest of her life.
madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)Filled with nothing but vinegar and piss.
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries' question to Justice Thomas: "When did you become such a hater?"
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Fucking die already and take the other 4 with you
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)He has not done one damn thing to materially affect my life one way or the other. In the big picture he is hardly a ripple.
plimsoll
(1,668 posts)We should call it the Thomas court. Thomas was a cypher the whole time Scalia was there, so you knew he was a piece of work but you never had to actually ponder the stuff he said because he didn't actually say anything. With Scalia gone Thomas has to stick up for his own nefarious views. We should just ignore that Roberts is supposedly the Chief Justice and acknowledge the real leader of that court; Clarence Thomas.
From now on, don't refer to the Supreme Court or the Roberts Court. It's the Thomas court, that way Roberts will be reminded who the real cypher is.
KS Toronado
(17,207 posts)Great idea, and since all white supremacists are reQublicOns this should really get under their skin.
Truth be known there's probably some already who want to rid the court of all non-white people.
llmart
(15,536 posts)If it wasn't for liberals you'd be picking cotton in the hot sun instead of sitting on the bench.
Fuck off!
Missn-Hitch
(1,383 posts)And they are a miserable bunch.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)With a tiny little goal in life. But it does explain a lot about his career.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Well, the tide will turn, eventually. It always does. We may not live to see it. But one of these days, his fondest wishes will be undone.
We wont forget, Clarence. And you cant hurt us all, no matter HOW MANY years youre at it.
This is WAR.
OMGWTF
(3,951 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)KS Toronado
(17,207 posts)the way Rs are stacking the courts with far right judges, we're getting to the point if we go to court for
any reason the first thing the judge is gonna ask is "Are you a R or a D?"
Going forward we need a rule/law which requires any person seeking to become a Judge has to be
approved by The American Bar Assn. Several Rs presently on the Supreme Court were not approved
by the ABA but that didn't stop repug congress critters from voting for them.
These far right judges are helping to turn The United States into a Fascist Government.
AverageOldGuy
(1,523 posts). . . sipping Cokes with pubic hairs for 43 years?
GreenEyedLefty
(2,073 posts)I'm just whinging at the universe here, but it's fucking infuriating
hadEnuf
(2,188 posts)for being with a white woman.
Not to mention that you would probably wouldn't have even gotten to tour the SCOTUS, let alone be on it.
This self loathing idiot isn't playing with a full deck, just like his wife.
Galraedia
(5,022 posts)That statement alone proves that he is not impartial and shouldn't be on the supreme court. His own wife is a domestic terrorist who committed seditious conspiracy to overthrow the duly elected government and will of the people. If he didn't support her decision he wouldn't be married to her. He should be impeached.
LudwigPastorius
(9,137 posts)Oh, the misery of being able to vote
The misery of being able to marry a women who wasn't black
The misery of the affirmative action that made it possible for you to go from dirt poor rural Georgia to Yale
Maybe you're just a miserable son of a bitch to begin with, Clarence.
CaptainTruth
(6,589 posts)rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)dlk
(11,558 posts)And hes so emotionally immature he sees fit to inflict revenge on the rest of us, and is proud of his corruption, daring us to do anything about it. He is eminently unqualified to sit on any bench, let alone the Supreme Court. If anyone was a candidate for impeachment, Thomas is at the top of the list.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)a RW extremist animated by intense racism and animosity toward white people and to the constitution itself. As these quotes illustrate. A really nasty piece of work with extremely flawed character and judgement given a lifetime appointment to our high court.
Someone joked that a black nationalist version of RW extremism at least added "breadth" of ideology to the court, but this court's behaviors suggest he's in effect not all that different from his white RW counterparts.
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)questioning the interpretation of the equal protection and due process clauses of the 14th Amendment (in his solo opinion) that basically grant him the right to be in an interracial marriage.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)He may lack the caliber of intellect justices should have, but he "questions" the interpretation because HE IS AN EXTREME CONSERVATIVE WHO WANTS TO OVERTURN THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, not because he's too stupid to examine how he could be affected.
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)but more likely he doesn't care about that.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)ways of seeing things, dependent on the extreme dishonesty required to deny truths that prove extremist thinking wrong and to provide delusional support for their views.
Just think what it means that a 43-year-old black man, full of vindictive resentments to justify, could claim that liberals, white of course, had made his life miserable since birth. (!) Not his fellow racist conservatives who would have made him a dirt poor, illiterate laborer unable to vote, at best. .
Always blows my mind to realize anew that this is on the supreme court. And now three more conservative extremists of their own types.
childfreebychoice
(476 posts)Was on welfare, and he was upset that he had to buy her a dress to wear to his swearing in. Anita hill, and that incident, told me all I needed to know about his moral core
Haru
(27 posts)There should be another way to select supreme court justices rather than using a political process that we currently have.
Definitely end the lifetime appointments.
Have an ethics requirement.
Many promises broken in the interview process.k
We now have this cartel of judges imposing their will America with no accountability.
bluesbassman
(19,371 posts)He is a Republican ultra Right Wing cult member. He may espouse Conservative viewpoints form time to time, but he is primarily motivated by extremist ideology and is a partisan hack. Hes the epitome of an activist judge.
lildDemz
(64 posts)for 43 years.
jaxexpat
(6,818 posts)The clod lolls about, the soul of contamination, further stagnating this cesspool of intentional mis-regulation by which we find ourselves stuck. Dwindling under misrule, helplessly plodding, seeking plain paths through thick mists in this, our bleak land of freedom-jargon and blatant charade.
You know, he's crazy. Looney as a rabid squirrel. Any situation he's in, he'll make worse simply by his proximity. A horrid, Gollum-like creature, a barnacle fiercely clinging onto a rotting hull.
budkin
(6,699 posts)In Uncle Tom.
kimbutgar
(21,131 posts)He is an evil pos
Ziggysmom
(3,406 posts)Now we can hate all races and sexes and backgrounds more easily if we combine them into one big overreaching ism. PARTYISM.
aggiesal
(8,911 posts)make decisions base on his anti-liberal bias.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)overthrow of our democracy & who knows how many other crimes without being punished. We need a JD that will step up to the plate & do its job.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)It's really sad.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)That's just so fucking sad. This feels like a success story to me.
Response to CousinIT (Original post)
traitorsgalore This message was self-deleted by its author.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)they make an easily spotted couple thanks to Loving v Va.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)this is just how fucking stupid he is
EndlessWire
(6,513 posts)then he is not fit to serve on the Court.
His wife, Ginni, is probably in deep doo doo. I don't think the J6 Committee would seek to interview her except to check out facts that they already have. They already know who she emailed and what her purpose was. They might also have a link to Clarence that we don't know about.
Clarence has got to go. Let us impeach him if he will not resign. Let's show him that his 43 years are now up.
Notice how the rest of the Court is absolutely silent? Why are we not hearing from any of them? Did I miss something there?
"This is nothing but a bag of shit!" A line from a comedy bit from someone, brought home by my brother from VN. Nothing changes under the sun, except that we have never before dealt with a SC full of traitors. Well, I guess we can handle that, too.
We may not agree with absolutely everything that the Court says, but taking away stare decisis is a big deal. We can't let this pass, either. Also, Clarence making statements about how he wants to kill other rights, principally gay rights, is appalling, extrajudicial, and extremely bad for the SC.
1-2-3-4, we don't want Clarence anymore!
#impeachclarence
Kid Berwyn
(14,884 posts)I think its from High School Madness side of Dont Crush that Dwarf, Hand Me the Plyers.
EndlessWire
(6,513 posts)BSdetect
(8,998 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,130 posts)In the legal community, Thomas is considered to be one of the worst SCOTUS justices in history
Link to tweet
https://thinkprogress.org/the-five-worst-supreme-court-justices-in-american-history-ranked-f725000b59e8/
Justice Clarence Thomas is the only current member of the Supreme Court who has explicitly embraced the reasoning of Lochner Era decisions striking down nationwide child labor laws and making similar attacks on federal power. Indeed, under the logic Thomas first laid out in a concurring opinion in United States v. Lopez, the federal minimum wage, overtime rules, anti-discrimination protections for workers, and even the national ban on whites-only lunch counters are all unconstitutional.
Though Thomass views are rare today, they have, sadly, not been the least bit uncommon during the Supreme Courts history. He makes this list because, frankly, he should know better than his predecessors. As I explain in Injustices, many of the justices who resisted progressive legislation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were, like Field, motivated by ideology. Many others, however, were motivated by fear of the rapid changes state and federal lawmakers implemented in the wake of the even more rapid changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution. It was possible to believe, in a world where factories, railroads, and the laws required to regulate factories and railroads were all very new things, that these laws would, as Herbert Hoover once said about the New Deal, destroy the very foundations of our American system by extending government into our economic and social life.
But Thomas has the benefit of eighty years of American history that Hoover had not witnessed when he warned of an overreaching government. In that time, the Supreme Court largely abandoned the values embraced by Justice Field, and the United States became the mightiest nation in the history of politics and the wealthiest nation in the history of money.