I wonder if Mo Brooks will appear tomorrow?

[Kingofalldems]

That's speculation on Twitter.

[CatWoman]

1. Mo Brooks was a fool

all he had to do was look at how Trump treated Sessions

[Effete Snob]

2. I'd bet Pat Cippolone

I doubt they'd want a loose cannon like Brooks for the hearing, since they aren't going to be asking the witness any questions they don't know the answers to, and they aren't going to hand a politician a megaphone.

[House of Roberts]

7. On the other hand,

asking him a question you have the answer, in the form of undisclosed testimony that could lead to a perjury charge, should he lie under oath, is always a better plan.

[Eliot Rosewater]

3. To say what, I wonder?

What we need is information, which we already have but even more conclusive that puts ALL republican voters in this box:

"yes, Jan 6 was a violent coup orchestrated by trump and many in the GOP and we will support it AGAIN when the time comes."

because we are in a very simple situation, you either are supporting that or you are voting for Democrats...

[zanana1]

8. What we need is evidence!

And a Justice Dept. that will convict Trump.

[Effete Snob]

9. .

[Eliot Rosewater]

15. Justice dept can indict, not convict.

You need unanimous jury to do that, how hard will it be to find one?

near impossible I guess

[zanana1]

17. Thanks for the info.

So if that's the case, this whole Jan.6 investigation is useless, isn't it?

[Captain Zero]

4. what about Mark Meadows?

what about the buffalo?

[brooklynite]

5. Makes no sense...

As any lawyer will tell you: "never ask a question you don't know the answer to". I find it hard to believe they'd bring in a hostile witness that they hadn't deposed.

[Effete Snob]

10. Ooohh Ooohh

The near-fatal attack convinced Rudy Giuliani to come in, since he now knows they are after him!

[brooklynite]

12. Depends on whether its cash bar...

[Effete Snob]

16. Lol

[Mordred]

6. Mo is a crazy wildcard

and legit true believer in massive voter fraud. No way he would be in a public hearing.

Only way his testimony is ever used would be in small video bites if he ever is interviewed/deposed by the committee.

[W_HAMILTON]

11. Has Brooks testified before the Committee before in private?

If so, I would agree that he'd make much more sense than Cipollone.

[Fiendish Thingy]

13. My guess is they wouldn't have Brooks testify live in open session

They’ll have him deposed in a closed door session, then show clips in the televised hearings.

They can manage the grandstanding that way.

I’m guessing either it’s the documentary footage, or Cippilone.

Long shots:
Kemp, Cleta Mitchell, an aide with significant testimony.

[Effete Snob]

14. Left Field Pick....

...there's been some developments about the funding and organizing for the J6 rally.