General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm guessing the witness on Tuesday could be Eastman.
If he is going to sing about Trump and Thomas, his life would be in danger - and hence the need for secrecy.
EDIT: No, it's not Eastman.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216858780
hlthe2b
(113,209 posts)My rare day off and I'll be glued to the tube.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)DOJ, because it won't help him coming from the January 6th committee
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Nobody felt the need to claim that the other witnesses against Trump were in danger for testifying. And none of their names were kept secret.
speak easy
(12,595 posts)Stinky The Clown
(68,937 posts)Bev54
(13,326 posts)Mr. Ected
(9,713 posts)Wouldn't that be grand!
speak easy
(12,595 posts)dweller
(28,002 posts)With the J6 investigations
dont think that would change now
✌🏻
speak easy
(12,595 posts)Ocelot II
(129,735 posts)speak easy
(12,595 posts)oh well. I'll settle for Mark Meadows
usonian
(24,128 posts)Someone who has names and proof of representatives and senators "and fiends of the court" (sic) deeply involved in the attack and/or elector-stuffing plans.

He can't stop the 
speak easy
(12,595 posts)ohh ... it's Ginni

