General Discussion

speak easy

(9,179 posts) Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:05 PM Jun 2022

I'm guessing the witness on Tuesday could be Eastman.

If he is going to sing about Trump and Thomas, his life would be in danger - and hence the need for secrecy.

EDIT: No, it's not Eastman.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216858780

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm guessing the witness on Tuesday could be Eastman. (Original Post) speak easy Jun 2022 OP

All I know is that I was going to treat myself ot a movie matinee tomorrow morning--no longer hlthe2b Jun 2022 #1

The only way I think he would do that is if he was given immunity, and that has to come from the JohnSJ Jun 2022 #2

Oh please... brooklynite Jun 2022 #3

None of the other witnesses were prima facie felons. speak easy Jun 2022 #5

That's one possiblity, for sure. Stinky The Clown Jun 2022 #4

I am hoping for Meadows. Bev54 Jun 2022 #6

My money is on Mark Meadows Mr. Ected Jun 2022 #7

'Harry' Halderman, come on down :) speak easy Jun 2022 #8

Eastman and Clarke have both pleaded the 5th dweller Jun 2022 #9

and been raided by the Feds. speak easy Jun 2022 #10

Nope. Ocelot II Jun 2022 #11

Agreed. It's not Eastman. speak easy Jun 2022 #12

My last word on this (until the top of the hour, I suspect) usonian Jun 2022 #13

"fiends of the court"? speak easy Jun 2022 #14

You got it usonian Jun 2022 #15

hlthe2b

(102,125 posts)

1. All I know is that I was going to treat myself ot a movie matinee tomorrow morning--no longer

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:06 PM

Jun 2022

My rare day off and I'll be glued to the tube.

JohnSJ

(92,061 posts)

2. The only way I think he would do that is if he was given immunity, and that has to come from the

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:06 PM

Jun 2022

DOJ, because it won't help him coming from the January 6th committee

brooklynite

(94,347 posts)

3. Oh please...

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:07 PM

Jun 2022

Nobody felt the need to claim that the other witnesses against Trump were in danger for testifying. And none of their names were kept secret.

speak easy

(9,179 posts)

5. None of the other witnesses were prima facie felons.

Reply to brooklynite (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:09 PM

Jun 2022

Stinky The Clown

(67,761 posts)

4. That's one possiblity, for sure.

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:07 PM

Jun 2022

Bev54

(10,039 posts)

6. I am hoping for Meadows.

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:21 PM

Jun 2022

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)

7. My money is on Mark Meadows

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:23 PM

Jun 2022

Wouldn't that be grand!

speak easy

(9,179 posts)

8. 'Harry' Halderman, come on down :)

Reply to Mr. Ected (Reply #7)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:28 PM

Jun 2022

dweller

(23,613 posts)

9. Eastman and Clarke have both pleaded the 5th

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:28 PM

Jun 2022

With the J6 investigations … don’t think that would change now

✌🏻

speak easy

(9,179 posts)

10. and been raided by the Feds.

Reply to dweller (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:30 PM

Jun 2022

Ocelot II

(115,587 posts)

11. Nope.

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:39 PM

Jun 2022

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216858780

speak easy

(9,179 posts)

12. Agreed. It's not Eastman.

Reply to Ocelot II (Reply #11)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:42 PM

Jun 2022

oh well. I'll settle for Mark Meadows

usonian

(9,691 posts)

13. My last word on this (until the top of the hour, I suspect)

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:43 PM

Jun 2022

Someone who has names and proof of representatives and senators "and fiends of the court" (sic) deeply involved in the attack and/or elector-stuffing plans.

He can't stop the