General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, something happened on Friday for Cassidy Hutchinson to suddenly provide more
information? That's the day she tossed her Trump lawyer for her own lawyer and 3 days later the J6 Committee was calling for a special meeting. Wouldn't it be sweet if Hutchinson is pro-choice and this is backlash for the Supreme Court Roe decision?
I would love to tell Eric Trump to suck it!
Lovie777
(12,230 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)Both Meadows and Trump were destroying records so her testimony would be vital. Especially interesting if she could tell the J6 what they were destroying, and if she could tell them where they could find copies.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)unless they were typed on a typewriter? Doesn't the government have its own cloud backup?
Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)My guess, though, is that it could have involved letters and documents from third parties, like the Federalist Society. Legal opinions from their handlers, telling them how they should act. In which case, without raiding the Federalist Society's place of business, or their members' home, there won't be a hard source we can rely on.
EndlessWire
(6,508 posts)that the J6 committee called for complete secrecy, yet still this info came out. They had to at least announce the new hearing so we would be aware of it, yet they pleaded for silence on the matter, to protect the witness. But, they didn't get it.
We won't know who the witness is until the hearing is underway. She may not be the bombshell witness, as they usually have three witnesses. So, I guess we'll find out.
mucifer
(23,525 posts)mobeau69
(11,140 posts)mucifer
(23,525 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)mopinko
(70,076 posts)i think that happened before the last hearing?