Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 1350 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obviously Garland is gonna charge him after today, (Original Post)
cilla4progress
Jun 2022
OP
edhopper
(33,573 posts)1. Check the Magic 8 Ball
"Ask again later"
BlueTsunami2018
(3,491 posts)2. If he doesn't after all this evidence, the country is truly over.
I think the whole point of these hearings is to be so overwhelming, so thorough, is that there is no choice for the DoJ but to move on it.
panader0
(25,816 posts)13. I've heard "the country is truly over" a thousand times here.
I wish it would stop.
Kablooie
(18,626 posts)3. Not yet.
Garland may have an opportunity now to flip some high level cronies like they do with the Mafia.
Only if they can get an avalanche of testimony from several top sources would they finally charge Trump.
He will be the very last one.
captain queeg
(10,171 posts)4. I can't see how it could be avoided
But I wouldnt make any bets yet. Maybe some of those who wont talk yet will when a grand jury indicts them.
dchill
(38,472 posts)5. It's that or dereliction of duty/violating his oath of office.
Just my opinion.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)6. Doubt it.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)7. Very funny!!
Gosh, I hope Im wrong I would love to be wrong.
But, this doesnt seem possible right now .
SCOTUS has taken a chunk out of me
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)8. Don't count on it.
Nope
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)10. Ditto.
What you said.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)9. WE GOT HIM!!!
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)11. We'll know when we know. Till then, we won't.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)12. I think there is a lot more.
T***P is being slowly simmered, tenderized, rendered.