General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust to rattle TFG's cage ...
... I'd love for the WH housekeeping manager to send Trump a bill for one broken plate and the cleaning supplies used to remove ketchup stains off the dining room wall.
Imagine Trump's reaction when, in the midst of all the legal and political shit he's facing, he gets an invoice saying:
"Unless we receive a certified check in the amount of $28.47 within thirty (30) business days, we will have no choice but to forward your unpaid account to our collections agency, at which time interest and other penalties may be added to the outstanding amount."
Being petty isn't the best revenge - but in certain circumstances, it can be oh-so-entertaining revenge.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Section 1361 protects "any property" of the United States or an agency or department thereof, or any property being manufactured or constructed for the United States or an agency or department thereof, from willful depredation or attempted depredation. "Depredation" has been characterized as the act of plundering, robbing, pillaging or laying waste. United States v. Jenkins, 554 F.2d 783, 786 (6th Cir. 1977); cf. Deal v. United States, 274 U.S. 277, 283 (1927) ("depredation" defined in context of postal statute). This section prohibits actual physical damage or destruction of both real and personal property, but mere adverse possession of that property without physical harm is insufficient to violate the law. United States v. Jenkins, supra, 554 F.2d at 785. Section 1361 is a specific intent crime, see United States v. Jones, 607 F.2d 269, 273-74 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1085 (1980), and the government must prove that the defendant acted willfully; that is intentionally, with knowledge that he/she is violating a law. United States v. Simpson, 460 F.2d 515, 518 (9th Cir. 1972); United States v. Moylan, 417 F.2d 1002, 1004 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 910 (1970). The government is not required to prove that defendant knew the property belonged to the government, because government ownership is "merely a 'jurisdictional fact'." United States v. LaPorta, 46 F.3d 152, 158 (2d Cir. 1994), quoting United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671 (1975). In fact, title or possession by the United States is not a necessary element of this offense, if the property in question was being made for the United States. The government must present evidence establishing value of damage. United States v. Seaman, 18 F.3d 649, 651 (9th Cir. 1994). The penalties for violations of this section are tied to the extent of the property damage. As amended on September 13, 1994, if the damage exceeds $100, the defendant is subject to a fine of up to $250,000, ten years imprisonment, or both. See Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103-322, § 330016, 108 Stat. 1796, 2146-47 (1994). When property damage does not exceed $100, the offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $100,000, one year imprisonment, or both. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a), 3571.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... I don't see that as an issue that anyone is going to pursue.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Is there any surprise that Trump continues to get by with his crimes when we make excuses for him and downplay his actions?
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... let's make total fools of ourselves by indicting Trump for dinnerware abuse.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)I will not defend a fascist liar and you shouldn't either. Doing so doesn't make ME look foolish.
Duppers
(28,118 posts)WhiteHouse fine china:
The set was manufactured by Pickard China at a cost of about $367,258.
The White House Historical Association, a private foundation established by First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy to purchase furniture and decorative and fine arts for the Executive Residence, provided the funds for the purchase.
White House china - Wikipedia
Rabrrrrrr
(58,347 posts)That's some pricey China! Holy shit.
whopis01
(3,510 posts)agingdem
(7,845 posts)I'm thinking class action lawsuit..
ariadne0614
(1,727 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Let's all pitch-in and pay for a lawyer to file a lawsuit that will cost tens of thousands of dollars to pursue!
Maybe we can get Sidney Powell to represent us, given her expertise in filing frivolous lawsuits that get laughed out of court.
agingdem
(7,845 posts)you get Sidney Powell on board..you may want to give Lin Woods a shout... and I'll handle the 309.5 million e-mail blast..could be more now that the six assholes on the court deemed zygotes viable human beings..
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)"Your Honour, as has already been established by my own lawyers, no one with a reasonable mind would ever take anything I say seriously."
agingdem
(7,845 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)gab13by13
(21,304 posts)is the revenge of Liz Cheney. When Trump took on Liz he unleashed the Kraken.
Meanwhile, Fani Willis is gathering evidence for her special grand jury.
calimary
(81,212 posts)Emile
(22,669 posts)It was all a big lie. Waiting for Republican outrage over Trump vandalism.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... the "'W'-keys Massacre" that almost brought our country to its knees - or was it the Bowling Green Massacre?
I always confuse the two.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)gab13by13
(21,304 posts)using porcelain china for 2 Big Macs, paper plates don't break.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... was a porcelain sippy-cup ever added to the official WH dinnerware service?
Just wonderin'.
pazzyanne
(6,547 posts)TheRickles
(2,057 posts)This is a photo of Obama's place setting, so there's no ketchup or Big Macs in sight, but it's a pretty fancy piece of porcelain (from an earlier DU post): https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216865826
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)I'm betting it was really a Big Mac box and an opened tube of catchup for the fries!
mopinko
(70,077 posts)Marcuse
(7,479 posts)rubbersole
(6,685 posts)Send him an invoice from the White House laundry- "Skid mark removal - daily". OK, that was unnecessary....
FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)Traildogbob
(8,713 posts)Emile
(22,669 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)Emile
(22,669 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)Wonder if they offer a matching bidet?
Texin
(2,594 posts)Hutchinson spoke of numerous such occurrences throughout her tenure.
YoshidaYui
(41,831 posts)Is fine me! Poke the pig allyou want, He is not a king or a dictator any longer. He got forced retirement. Maybe he should have his social security go to struggling Seniors! He wont need it in prison!
Bayard
(22,057 posts)After he tried to flush down documents.
dsharp88
(487 posts)His infantile tantrums likely resulted in shattered dishes and ketchup-stained walls on many occasions.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)n a later tweet, which has also since been deleted, O'Day alleges she has texts from Donald Jr. complaining about the youngest sibling, Baron.
"and while we are at it.. I have texts of don jr telling me what a little s*** a****** barron is." O'Day said. "That they were on the private jet and barron didn't like his food so he threw the plate across the plane at the attendant. NONE of these people are INNOCENT of being a******* & liars!"
https://www.newsweek.com/aubrey-o-day-donald-trump-jr-ivanka-eric-trump-tweets-1541628