If you're making negative comments or disputing something someone under oath testified to

[onecaliberal]

while you refuse to testify under oath. Don’t expect real people to give your comments any weight. Testify under oath or shut the fuck up.

[SoCalDavidS]

1. He's Not Speaking To "Real People"

He's addressing the MORONS in his base, who would believe him if he said he was JFK, Jr. reincarnated.

[Ohio Joe]

2. That is the bottom line...

Any of them can come testify yet... They refuse to do so. It gives the marks room to continue lying to themselves but the vast majority see it for what it is... Bullshit.

[Walleye]

3. Unfortunately the news people tend to repeat these false statements as if they're credible

[Nevilledog]

8. Somehow "unnamed source" carries the same weight as testifying under oath.

The media does such a disservice to the country.

[KentuckyWoman]

10. Well put.

[malaise]

4. That simple

Rec

[czarjak]

5. "Fifth"...

All good now?

[SheltieLover]

6. Absolutely!

[bringthePaine]

7. 🤣if bringing bullshit to a sworn-oatH fight is all ya got, gonna be a long day...

[gratuitous]

9. The bulldogs of the Fourth Estate should heed this, as well

Instead of carrying water for unnamed sources close to the Secret Service that they dispute the sworn testimony of a former White House aide.

[plimsoll]

11. The reporters who present this stuff need to point out that these articles

are the actual hearsay.

One person can be prosecuted for lying about something they heard. The people who she claims to have said it won't deny it publicly or under oath.

Save it for the gullible. Oh wait.

[867-5309.]

12. CBS is reporting Engel and the driver are prepared to testify under oath

We shall see.

[onecaliberal]

13. They ALREADY did is my understanding.

On edit: this same piece of shit helped trump with the clearing of protesters for the upside down Bible photo op.