General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor Many Women, Roe Was About More Than Abortion. It Was About Freedom.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/29/us/women-abortion-roe-wade.htmlhttps://archive.ph/C3JQU
For Many Women, Roe Was About More Than Abortion. It Was About Freedom.
After the reversal of Roe v. Wade, some women are reconsidering their plans, including where they live, and wondering how best to channel their anger.
By Julie Bosman
June 29, 2022, 3:00 a.m. ET
...
For women who had sought abortions in states where clinics were forced to shutter, the ruling was an immediate catastrophe, jeopardizing their decision to terminate their pregnancies.
Yet the decision reached far beyond them across generations and geography, across race and class. Many women were sent spinning, questioning their place in society, at least in the eyes of the Supreme Court.
In dozens of interviews this week, American women who support abortion rights recalled the moment when they heard that Roe had been overturned, and the waves of shock and fury that followed. They reflected on how access to legal abortion had quietly undergirded their personal decisions, even if they had never sought one themselves. They worried that the progress many women have made since abortion was legalized in education, the workplace and in the culture would be halted.
And they reconsidered their own plans and those of their children: whether they should live, work or attend colleges in states where abortion has been banned, how they could help other women with unwanted pregnancies, and whether they would ever recover the constitutional right to receive a safe abortion, a guarantee that tens of millions of women have known their entire lives.
...
secondwind
(16,903 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)XanaDUer2
(10,638 posts)We must always be vigilant
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)Young women today probably don't quite realize what being pregnant all the time means for them and their future.
Some of us older women saw it first hand.
onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)I have actually heard people say that the SC ruling will be good for tourist dollars!
And will be a plus as women travel to get abortions.
Not taking into account that teens and poor women cannot travel due to lack of funds or support.
Or that even women who can travel may have legal consequences.
Many of us older women saw first hand what life was like for our grandmothers and mothers.
onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)Or a septic mom. This isnt good. Will hit people of color the hardest.
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)It is going to be very hard to watch history repeat itself.
onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)CousinIT
(9,239 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)Women with a lot of children will have to stay home with the kids.
Unless the men decide to stay home.
One income households means lower standard of living.
2naSalit
(86,526 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,641 posts)BlueSky3
(511 posts)to mass migration out of red states. The comments in the article were interesting. One person wrote that they live in a red state and wont be leaving because they need to be there to vote Democratic.