Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUSblog: LIVE Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, 2022
Source: https://www.scotusblog.com/
One more day, and then they're done.
The blog goes live at 9:30, and the announcements begin at 10:00.
LIVE
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30
By Angie Gou
on Jun 30, 2022 at 12:00 am
On Thursday, June 30, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases from the current term.
Click here for a list of FAQs about opinion announcements.
{snip}
Recommended Citation: Angie Gou, Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, SCOTUSblog (Jun. 30, 2022, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-30/
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30
By Angie Gou
on Jun 30, 2022 at 12:00 am
On Thursday, June 30, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases from the current term.
Click here for a list of FAQs about opinion announcements.
{snip}
Recommended Citation: Angie Gou, Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, SCOTUSblog (Jun. 30, 2022, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-30/
https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger
https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog
https://twitter.com/scotusreporter
https://twitter.com/mjs_DC
https://twitter.com/LeahLitman
https://twitter.com/Dahlialithwick
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 803 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUSblog: LIVE Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, 2022 (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
OP
West Virginia is first. Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
#8
The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency ...
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
#10
The bit of it is, people won't be outraged over the demise of regulatory agencies
Midnight Writer
Jun 2022
#11
"The Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term."
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
#14
lamp_shade
(14,827 posts)1. Thanks.
Amishman
(5,555 posts)2. W.V. v EPA could be more impactful than Dobbs
If they actually fully overturn Chevron and its deference standard, almost every federal agency would be extremely vulnerable and effectively hamstrung. It would take years (and a cooperative congress) to backstop with legislation.
In It to Win It
(8,234 posts)7. This shouldn't even be a case
The Obama-era rule that WV is suing over has not been in effect FOR YEARS! WV is not being harmed by the rule that they are suing over because the rule had been scrapped.
Takket
(21,555 posts)3. What fresh hell do they have for us today?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)4. And they're off. NT
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)5. Kiss the ability of agencies to regulate good-bye.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)6. Random comments as people get ready
5 minutes ago
I have Kavanaugh writing a 7-2 opinion in the Texas case and Roberts writing a 6-3er for the WV case, in a big setback for agency authority.
ManOfWandT
I have Kavanaugh writing a 7-2 opinion in the Texas case and Roberts writing a 6-3er for the WV case, in a big setback for agency authority.
ManOfWandT
4 minutes ago
How many eyes on the blog this am?
FLsunshineluv'r
How many eyes on the blog this am?
FLsunshineluv'r
4 minutes ago
If ruling is in favor of WV, this will be bigger than R v W. It will give rights back to the states since the 1930's. It will effect many more agencies than the EPA to set rules on states from non-elected individuals. Many of which were created under executive orders. This is a HUGE ruling!
NoSoup4U
If ruling is in favor of WV, this will be bigger than R v W. It will give rights back to the states since the 1930's. It will effect many more agencies than the EPA to set rules on states from non-elected individuals. Many of which were created under executive orders. This is a HUGE ruling!
NoSoup4U
7 minutes ago
By the way, I heard the court held its end-of-year staff celebration this month at a new location: Medieval Times.
Mark Walsh
By the way, I heard the court held its end-of-year staff celebration this month at a new location: Medieval Times.
Mark Walsh
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)8. West Virginia is first. Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps.
Last edited Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:50 AM - Edit history (1)
2 minutes ago
West Virginia is first.
Amy Howe
West Virginia is first.
Amy Howe
a minute ago
It is by the Chief. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.
Amy Howe
It is by the Chief. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.
Amy Howe
a minute ago
Surprise: No R number.
Kathleen Foley
Surprise: No R number.
Kathleen Foley
a few seconds ago
Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the (Obama era) Clean Power Plan.
Amy Howe
Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the (Obama era) Clean Power Plan.
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf
Ellena Erskine
Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf
Ellena Erskine
16 minutes ago
So does the EPA ruling call into question the ability of ANY agency to make autonomous decisions unless explicitly granted authority by Congress?
rcw
So does the EPA ruling call into question the ability of ANY agency to make autonomous decisions unless explicitly granted authority by Congress?
rcw
a minute ago
Good day for Yaakov Roth of Jones Day, who argued on behalf of the coal companies in West Virginia v. EPA and is the counsel for Percoco.
Amy Howe
Good day for Yaakov Roth of Jones Day, who argued on behalf of the coal companies in West Virginia v. EPA and is the counsel for Percoco.
Amy Howe
Native
(5,940 posts)9. There goes the planet!
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)10. The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency ...
10 minutes ago
This is, Roberts writes, a "major questions case."
Amy Howe
This is, Roberts writes, a "major questions case."
Amy Howe
10 minutes ago
@Notorious JHP Maybe breathing will become affordable again!
BlogWatcher
@Notorious JHP Maybe breathing will become affordable again!
BlogWatcher
10 minutes ago
Not an attorney, but it sure seems to be a broadside into Chevron without naming the broadsided ship.
MIchaelW
Not an attorney, but it sure seems to be a broadside into Chevron without naming the broadsided ship.
MIchaelW
9 minutes ago
The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency the power to make decisions of vast economic and political significance, it must say so clearly.
Amy Howe
The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency the power to make decisions of vast economic and political significance, it must say so clearly.
Amy Howe
11 minutes ago
Major Questions doctrine exists to enforce the idea that Congress must specifically tell agencies what to do, rather than pass broad enabling legislation that executive agencies can interpret as they see fit - thereby diluting political accountability
AWH
Major Questions doctrine exists to enforce the idea that Congress must specifically tell agencies what to do, rather than pass broad enabling legislation that executive agencies can interpret as they see fit - thereby diluting political accountability
AWH
14 minutes ago
I'm not sure 10 minutes is enough for Amy to fairly summarize this decision, so I'm going to ask the court to delay the release of the next opinion.
Mark Walsh
I'm not sure 10 minutes is enough for Amy to fairly summarize this decision, so I'm going to ask the court to delay the release of the next opinion.
Mark Walsh
Midnight Writer
(21,745 posts)11. The bit of it is, people won't be outraged over the demise of regulatory agencies
You won't see folks marching in the streets to give power back to alphabet agencies that commoners don't know much about.
This has the potential to be a major train wreck.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)12. Here is Biden v. Texas, and it is by the Chief.
14 minutes ago
It is Biden v. Texas and it is by the Chief.
Amy Howe
It is Biden v. Texas and it is by the Chief.
Amy Howe
14 minutes ago
It is 5-4 with Kavanaugh joining the three liberal justices and the chief.
Amy Howe
It is 5-4 with Kavanaugh joining the three liberal justices and the chief.
Amy Howe
13 minutes ago
Another merits decision, despite available justiciability off-ramps.
Kathleen Foley
Another merits decision, despite available justiciability off-ramps.
Kathleen Foley
13 minutes ago
And here's the last opinion link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf
Ellena Erskine
And here's the last opinion link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf
Ellena Erskine
17 minutes ago
The Court holds that the Biden administration's decision to terminate the Migrant Protection Protocol, also known as the Remain in Mexico policy, did not violate federal immigration law, and the October memorandum was a final agency action.
Amy Howe
The Court holds that the Biden administration's decision to terminate the Migrant Protection Protocol, also known as the Remain in Mexico policy, did not violate federal immigration law, and the October memorandum was a final agency action.
Amy Howe
17 minutes ago
"Join to all but the first sentence" Absolute classic.
Miguel Lewiston
"Join to all but the first sentence" Absolute classic.
Miguel Lewiston
17 minutes ago
"BARRETT, J., filed a dissenting opin-
ion, in which THOMAS, ALITO, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined as to all but the
first sentence"
Justic Curiam
"BARRETT, J., filed a dissenting opin-
ion, in which THOMAS, ALITO, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined as to all but the
first sentence"
Justic Curiam
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)13. There will be an order list at 10:45 today.
17 minutes ago
The Chief Justice has just issued an end-of-term press release, in which he announces (among other things) that there will be an order list at 10:45 today.
Amy Howe
The Chief Justice has just issued an end-of-term press release, in which he announces (among other things) that there will be an order list at 10:45 today.
Amy Howe
18 minutes ago
Note that the chief did announce that the orders list out of yesterday's conference will be released shortly, at 10:45 a.m. ET. This is likely to allow Justice Breyer's votes on those orders to count before his retirement becomes effective at noon.
Mark Walsh
Note that the chief did announce that the orders list out of yesterday's conference will be released shortly, at 10:45 a.m. ET. This is likely to allow Justice Breyer's votes on those orders to count before his retirement becomes effective at noon.
Mark Walsh
14 minutes ago
We're expecting a shadow docket Order on (one of) Arizona's abortion bans this a.m. - Kagan held it pending Dobbs, then there were docket issues yesterday. She referred it to the entire court. More: bit.ly
https://bit.ly/AZlaw1306
ArizonasLaw.org
We're expecting a shadow docket Order on (one of) Arizona's abortion bans this a.m. - Kagan held it pending Dobbs, then there were docket issues yesterday. She referred it to the entire court. More: bit.ly
https://bit.ly/AZlaw1306
ArizonasLaw.org
15 minutes ago
The order list that we expect in just over 15 minutes has the potential to be a big one. The justices could act on Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina election case asking them to take up the "independent state legislature" theory.
Amy Howe
The order list that we expect in just over 15 minutes has the potential to be a big one. The justices could act on Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina election case asking them to take up the "independent state legislature" theory.
Amy Howe
15 minutes ago
We also could get action on Dr. A v. Hochul, the challenge to New York's vaccine mandate for health-care workers.
Amy Howe
We also could get action on Dr. A v. Hochul, the challenge to New York's vaccine mandate for health-care workers.
Amy Howe
a minute ago
Here's the list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/063022zor_5he6.pdf
Ellena Erskine
Here's the list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/063022zor_5he6.pdf
Ellena Erskine
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)14. "The Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term."
17 minutes ago
The chief has released his end of term statement:
I am authorized to announce that the Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term. Disposition of items considered at conference yesterday will be reflected on an Order List that will be released at 10:45 a.m. today. The Court will then be in recess from today until the first Monday in October 2022, at which time the October 2021 Term of the Court will be adjourned, and the October 2022 Term of the Court will begin, as provided by law.
Mark Walsh
The chief has released his end of term statement:
I am authorized to announce that the Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term. Disposition of items considered at conference yesterday will be reflected on an Order List that will be released at 10:45 a.m. today. The Court will then be in recess from today until the first Monday in October 2022, at which time the October 2021 Term of the Court will be adjourned, and the October 2022 Term of the Court will begin, as provided by law.
Mark Walsh
17 minutes ago
For those curious, here's the full end-of-term statement that Roberts just released: https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_06-30-22
James Romoser
For those curious, here's the full end-of-term statement that Roberts just released: https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_06-30-22
James Romoser
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)15. Here's a link to the new circuit assignments:
a few seconds ago
Here's a link to the new circuit assignments: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/063022zr_7mi8.pdf
Ellena Erskine
Here's a link to the new circuit assignments: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/063022zr_7mi8.pdf
Ellena Erskine