Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 06:46 AM Jun 2022

SCOTUSblog: LIVE Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, 2022





Source: https://www.scotusblog.com/

One more day, and then they're done.

The blog goes live at 9:30, and the announcements begin at 10:00.

LIVE

Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30

By Angie Gou
on Jun 30, 2022 at 12:00 am

On Thursday, June 30, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases from the current term.

Click here for a list of FAQs about opinion announcements.

{snip}

Recommended Citation: Angie Gou, Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, SCOTUSblog (Jun. 30, 2022, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-30/

https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger

https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog

https://twitter.com/scotusreporter

https://twitter.com/mjs_DC

https://twitter.com/LeahLitman

https://twitter.com/Dahlialithwick
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUSblog: LIVE Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 30, 2022 (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 OP
Thanks. lamp_shade Jun 2022 #1
W.V. v EPA could be more impactful than Dobbs Amishman Jun 2022 #2
This shouldn't even be a case In It to Win It Jun 2022 #7
What fresh hell do they have for us today? Takket Jun 2022 #3
And they're off. NT mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #4
Kiss the ability of agencies to regulate good-bye. sinkingfeeling Jun 2022 #5
Random comments as people get ready mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #6
West Virginia is first. Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #8
There goes the planet! Native Jun 2022 #9
The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency ... mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #10
The bit of it is, people won't be outraged over the demise of regulatory agencies Midnight Writer Jun 2022 #11
Here is Biden v. Texas, and it is by the Chief. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #12
There will be an order list at 10:45 today. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #13
"The Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term." mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #14
Here's a link to the new circuit assignments: mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2022 #15

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
2. W.V. v EPA could be more impactful than Dobbs
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 08:03 AM
Jun 2022

If they actually fully overturn Chevron and its deference standard, almost every federal agency would be extremely vulnerable and effectively hamstrung. It would take years (and a cooperative congress) to backstop with legislation.

In It to Win It

(8,234 posts)
7. This shouldn't even be a case
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:51 AM
Jun 2022

The Obama-era rule that WV is suing over has not been in effect FOR YEARS! WV is not being harmed by the rule that they are suing over because the rule had been scrapped.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
6. Random comments as people get ready
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:51 AM
Jun 2022
5 minutes ago

I have Kavanaugh writing a 7-2 opinion in the Texas case and Roberts writing a 6-3er for the WV case, in a big setback for agency authority.

ManOfWandT


4 minutes ago

How many eyes on the blog this am?

FLsunshineluv'r


4 minutes ago

If ruling is in favor of WV, this will be bigger than R v W. It will give rights back to the states since the 1930's. It will effect many more agencies than the EPA to set rules on states from non-elected individuals. Many of which were created under executive orders. This is a HUGE ruling!

NoSoup4U

7 minutes ago

By the way, I heard the court held its end-of-year staff celebration this month at a new location: Medieval Times.

Mark Walsh

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
8. West Virginia is first. Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps.
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:02 AM
Jun 2022

Last edited Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:50 AM - Edit history (1)

2 minutes ago

West Virginia is first.

Amy Howe

a minute ago

It is by the Chief. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.

Amy Howe

a minute ago

Surprise: No R number.

Kathleen Foley

a few seconds ago

Congress did not give the EPA the power to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the (Obama era) Clean Power Plan.

Amy Howe

a few seconds ago

Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf

Ellena Erskine

16 minutes ago

So does the EPA ruling call into question the ability of ANY agency to make autonomous decisions unless explicitly granted authority by Congress?

rcw

a minute ago

Good day for Yaakov Roth of Jones Day, who argued on behalf of the coal companies in West Virginia v. EPA and is the counsel for Percoco.

Amy Howe

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
10. The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency ...
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:16 AM
Jun 2022
10 minutes ago

This is, Roberts writes, a "major questions case."

Amy Howe

10 minutes ago

@Notorious JHP Maybe breathing will become affordable again!

BlogWatcher

10 minutes ago

Not an attorney, but it sure seems to be a broadside into Chevron without naming the broadsided ship.

MIchaelW

9 minutes ago

The major questions doctrine is the idea that if Congress wants to give an administrative agency the power to make “decisions of vast economic and political significance,” it must say so clearly.

Amy Howe

11 minutes ago

Major Questions doctrine exists to enforce the idea that Congress must specifically tell agencies what to do, rather than pass broad enabling legislation that executive agencies can interpret as they see fit - thereby diluting political accountability

AWH

14 minutes ago

I'm not sure 10 minutes is enough for Amy to fairly summarize this decision, so I'm going to ask the court to delay the release of the next opinion.

Mark Walsh

Midnight Writer

(21,745 posts)
11. The bit of it is, people won't be outraged over the demise of regulatory agencies
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:22 AM
Jun 2022

You won't see folks marching in the streets to give power back to alphabet agencies that commoners don't know much about.

This has the potential to be a major train wreck.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
12. Here is Biden v. Texas, and it is by the Chief.
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:26 AM
Jun 2022
14 minutes ago

It is Biden v. Texas and it is by the Chief.

Amy Howe

14 minutes ago

It is 5-4 with Kavanaugh joining the three liberal justices and the chief.

Amy Howe

13 minutes ago

Another merits decision, despite available justiciability off-ramps.

Kathleen Foley

13 minutes ago

And here's the last opinion link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf

Ellena Erskine

17 minutes ago

The Court holds that the Biden administration's decision to terminate the Migrant Protection Protocol, also known as the Remain in Mexico policy, did not violate federal immigration law, and the October memorandum was a final agency action.

Amy Howe

17 minutes ago

"Join to all but the first sentence" Absolute classic.

Miguel Lewiston

17 minutes ago

"BARRETT, J., filed a dissenting opin-
ion, in which THOMAS, ALITO, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined as to all but the
first sentence"

Justic Curiam

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
13. There will be an order list at 10:45 today.
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:35 AM
Jun 2022
17 minutes ago

The Chief Justice has just issued an end-of-term press release, in which he announces (among other things) that there will be an order list at 10:45 today.

Amy Howe

18 minutes ago

Note that the chief did announce that the orders list out of yesterday's conference will be released shortly, at 10:45 a.m. ET. This is likely to allow Justice Breyer's votes on those orders to count before his retirement becomes effective at noon.

Mark Walsh

14 minutes ago

We're expecting a shadow docket Order on (one of) Arizona's abortion bans this a.m. - Kagan held it pending Dobbs, then there were docket issues yesterday. She referred it to the entire court. More: bit.ly
https://bit.ly/AZlaw1306

ArizonasLaw.org

15 minutes ago

The order list that we expect in just over 15 minutes has the potential to be a big one. The justices could act on Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina election case asking them to take up the "independent state legislature" theory.

Amy Howe

15 minutes ago

We also could get action on Dr. A v. Hochul, the challenge to New York's vaccine mandate for health-care workers.

Amy Howe

a minute ago

Here's the list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/063022zor_5he6.pdf

Ellena Erskine

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
14. "The Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term."
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:38 AM
Jun 2022
17 minutes ago

The chief has released his end of term statement:
I am authorized to announce that the Court has acted upon all cases submitted to the Court for decision this Term. Disposition of items considered at conference yesterday will be reflected on an Order List that will be released at 10:45 a.m. today. The Court will then be in recess from today until the first Monday in October 2022, at which time the October 2021 Term of the Court will be adjourned, and the October 2022 Term of the Court will begin, as provided by law.

Mark Walsh

17 minutes ago

For those curious, here's the full end-of-term statement that Roberts just released: https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_06-30-22

James Romoser
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUSblog: LIVE Announce...