General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn It to Win It
(12,904 posts)He's putting his neck out there! Don't let it be for nothing!
Trailrider1951
(3,583 posts)Let's not let a good codify go to waste.
OrlandoDem2
(3,256 posts)Its not a lot to ask.
Trailrider1951
(3,583 posts)I wish more Americans thought that way.
uponit7771
(93,533 posts)SergeStorms
(21,058 posts)If you're carving out a spot for privacy laws there's no harm in bringing voting rights along for the ride.
It would be an overdue "fuck you" to McConnell.
Srkdqltr
(10,144 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Up until now he didn't.
Srkdqltr
(10,144 posts)He was waiting for the best issue to change his mind. Also. He will be putting the Supreme court on the defensive.
Polybius
(22,292 posts)I could have sworn that he supported it for voting rights too.
BComplex
(10,024 posts)Manchin is totally against both abortion AND stopping anything having to do with the filibuster. Biden knows that.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Having a Senate that could end up in GOP hands w/o a filibuster to check their extremism is a scary prospect.
The GOP could use the same tool to make abortion illegal nationwide. And that would hardly be the end of the destruction they could unleash.
Buckeyeblue
(6,487 posts)That not only extends to privacy and equality issues but also voting rights. It should be very specific.
This is something all Democratic candidates for the house and senate can get behind.
mitch96
(15,912 posts)a strong flip the switch easy peasy minority veto.. Make they work for that veto if they believe it so much..
m
Novara
(6,115 posts)Sinema is on the record as refusing to change it for anything. Manchin too.
We're fucked.
bottomofthehill
(9,453 posts)What the President thinks about the filibuster matters none. He no longer has a vote in the Senate. When he was in the Senate he had a 1 100th of a say, now none. He can say he would like to see it but past that .
Celerity
(55,367 posts)Joe Manchin that is.
