Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme court says EPA can't regulate powerplant emmisdions.
Lets just keep pouring filth into the air.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/30/-supreme-court-says-epa-lacks-authority-on-climate-standards-for-power-plants.html
CA needs to set up coal plants on the AZ and NV boarders
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme court says EPA can't regulate powerplant emmisdions. (Original Post)
Old Crank
Jun 2022
OP
comradebillyboy
(10,944 posts)1. Well there weren't any power plants back in 1790 so ...
RoeVWade
(873 posts)2. Appears to me Court prefers science be ruled by political whims, not the other way around.
nt/
Seeking Serenity
(3,295 posts)3. This is disinformation
That is not at all what the Court held.
Their holding was bad enough, but this summation is wrong and thus not helpful.
Irish_Dem
(80,411 posts)4. If the EPA cannot regulate emissions what is the point?
Old Crank
(6,767 posts)5. The case should never been brought up.
The regulation was not in effect so there was no damage to the company.
This is a pre-emptive strike on the government's ability to regulate.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)6. Not under current law, in any case.
However, as I understand it, Congress can give EPA that power. SCOTUS ruled that it hasn't yet done so.
