Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (a kennedy) on Mon Jul 4, 2022, 06:15 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post)
a kennedy
Jul 2022
OP
I know. But........look at the piece of shit now....Thomas, is running the court. Just saying.
a kennedy
Jul 2022
#2
mcar
(45,813 posts)1. How many years ago was this?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
a kennedy
(35,564 posts)2. I know. But........look at the piece of shit now....Thomas, is running the court. Just saying.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Hotler
(13,746 posts)8. Ginni is running it. nt
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Response to mcar (Reply #1)
In It to Win It This message was self-deleted by its author.
SharonAnn
(14,152 posts)5. About 30 years ago.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
andym
(6,053 posts)4. Biden voted Nay on Thomas. NT.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
madinmaryland
(65,690 posts)9. End of discussion. Period.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
✅
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Hekate
(100,133 posts)13. Haters gonna cherry-pick
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
NoRethugFriends
(3,680 posts)7. We all knew he was a piece of shit then
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
mahina
(20,520 posts)10. So weird.
I thought I already blocked you. Anyway cheers, have a nice weekend.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Bettie
(19,446 posts)12. He was wrong
but I would hope that he no longer believes that old Clarence is a good judge.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Hekate
(100,133 posts)14. It says upthread that Biden voted against confirming Thomas. You want to edit your post?
Or just leave it as a smear?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,731 posts)15. The Five Worst Supreme Court Justices In American History, Ranked
In the legal community, Thomas is considered to be one of the worst SCOTUS justices in history
Link to tweet
https://thinkprogress.org/the-five-worst-supreme-court-justices-in-american-history-ranked-f725000b59e8/
5) Justice Clarence Thomas
Justice Clarence Thomas is the only current member of the Supreme Court who has explicitly embraced the reasoning of Lochner Era decisions striking down nationwide child labor laws and making similar attacks on federal power. Indeed, under the logic Thomas first laid out in a concurring opinion in United States v. Lopez, the federal minimum wage, overtime rules, anti-discrimination protections for workers, and even the national ban on whites-only lunch counters are all unconstitutional.
Though Thomass views are rare today, they have, sadly, not been the least bit uncommon during the Supreme Courts history. He makes this list because, frankly, he should know better than his predecessors. As I explain in Injustices, many of the justices who resisted progressive legislation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were, like Field, motivated by ideology. Many others, however, were motivated by fear of the rapid changes state and federal lawmakers implemented in the wake of the even more rapid changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution. It was possible to believe, in a world where factories, railroads, and the laws required to regulate factories and railroads were all very new things, that these laws would, as Herbert Hoover once said about the New Deal, destroy the very foundations of our American system by extending government into our economic and social life.
But Thomas has the benefit of eighty years of American history that Hoover had not witnessed when he warned of an overreaching government. In that time, the Supreme Court largely abandoned the values embraced by Justice Field, and the United States became the mightiest nation in the history of politics and the wealthiest nation in the history of money.
Justice Clarence Thomas is the only current member of the Supreme Court who has explicitly embraced the reasoning of Lochner Era decisions striking down nationwide child labor laws and making similar attacks on federal power. Indeed, under the logic Thomas first laid out in a concurring opinion in United States v. Lopez, the federal minimum wage, overtime rules, anti-discrimination protections for workers, and even the national ban on whites-only lunch counters are all unconstitutional.
Though Thomass views are rare today, they have, sadly, not been the least bit uncommon during the Supreme Courts history. He makes this list because, frankly, he should know better than his predecessors. As I explain in Injustices, many of the justices who resisted progressive legislation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were, like Field, motivated by ideology. Many others, however, were motivated by fear of the rapid changes state and federal lawmakers implemented in the wake of the even more rapid changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution. It was possible to believe, in a world where factories, railroads, and the laws required to regulate factories and railroads were all very new things, that these laws would, as Herbert Hoover once said about the New Deal, destroy the very foundations of our American system by extending government into our economic and social life.
But Thomas has the benefit of eighty years of American history that Hoover had not witnessed when he warned of an overreaching government. In that time, the Supreme Court largely abandoned the values embraced by Justice Field, and the United States became the mightiest nation in the history of politics and the wealthiest nation in the history of money.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
