General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDon't know why I didn't think about this before.
Last edited Mon Jul 4, 2022, 10:40 AM - Edit history (1)
We already know that the Conservative's textualist process is a ruse to lasso this country back to the 1800s. Each day we struggle to understand how an institution that relies on reasoning could reach the decisions that it has been making. Today I thought of a new way to understand this, in a rational manner.
It just takes a simple look at what is defined as primary and secondary law. From Google:
Primary and Secondary Legal Sources
Primary legal sources are the actual law in the form of constitutions, court cases, statutes, and administrative rules and regulations. Secondary legal sources may restate the law, but they also discuss, analyze, describe, explain, or critique it as well.
Major emphasis on ACTUAL law. To me, that means that the law in the United States was always meant to be dynamic. Moving and changing to meet the needs of a growing population. Thus, a living document. If it weren't a living document, we would call it a Bible. Static rules that never change, which would render Congress obsolete. It's like the Rogue Court is usurping the power of our legislators. tying their hands so they can't do their job of making new laws to deal with new situations that our country faces every day.
The Rogue Court's static thinking became apparent when it broke with established primary law in order to repressively and regressively take us back to a time that doesn't even exist any longer, except for pockets of their individual societies. And this is why a theocratic leaning justice is a problem in this country. They want one, unchanging, static book to rule us all. It's their mindset. They are indoctrinated to follow rituals and tradition that never change. At least, in their personal beliefs. This is not a good formula for a country of more than 300 million people, because their religious beliefs will inevitably interfere with the Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness of millions. Most of us Americans were taught to reach for the stars and become the best at whatever makes us happiest. And for most of us, that means freedom from the most repressive aspects of community life.
We certainly have a battle on our hands, but at least, reasoning and logic is on our side.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,172 posts)in the original seems to prove that the Constitution was never intended to remain static.
Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)Freddie
(9,258 posts)Means that its impossible, now. I (female) cant even get equal rights guaranteed by law.
Hugin
(33,100 posts)The so-called originalists have as their unspoken goal since before Sarah Palin wore patent leather shoes to revert the Constitution back to a form that never existed. It probably started at least shortly after the Civil War, if not much earlier with the second Constitutional Convention.
They are trying to force a Constitutional Convention to change the Constitution. They believe they can control the process by controlling the State legislatures. Of course, there are other paths to change it. Those require some interaction at the national federal level which would never stand for their extreme views.
I personally think what they object to in the current Constitution is that it is there to recognize and expand civil rights. They want it instead to suppress those who they see as inferior (or even sinful):
I guarantee the vast majority of their base dont even know what they are fighting for and really have no care as long as they are told they are winning. Winning what? Oppression.
Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)I especially like your point that the vast majority of their base don't even know what they are fighting for.
And that might be the Achille's Heel, because the right-wing architects are slashing and dashing so hard at everyone and everything, that there will be slough off of support as some begin to recognize that their rights are also being encroached on.
We are not in a position where focusing on an amendment is realistic now. There are many, many other things that come first.
eppur_se_muova
(36,256 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)Good catch. Thank you.