General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoinfortmill
(14,419 posts)betsuni
(25,519 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)We have a politics-in-money problem, not money-in-politics. Business is cheating, naturally corrupt. (For you, I make no profit!) its acceptable.
Lawmakers are supposed to be truthful.
Politicians sticking their nose in business markets is the problem. The permanent laws they create dont regulate, they steer money in a corrupt way to business that ultimately favors themthrough donations or grandstanding popularity. They arent helping business, theyre speed bumps.
Cherokee100
(266 posts)I think I remember, a thing called 'Citizens United'. Passed by the 'extreme court', maybe 20 years ago. Enough said.
betsuni
(25,519 posts)They started down the path to today in the seventies. That all dysfunction in politics is only because of money is a simplistic populist thing. If Citizens United was repealed tomorrow Republicans would be exactly the same.
Traildogbob
(8,739 posts)The court approved money in politics, Roberts court destroyed voters rights and look at this fucking court. And CO Equal branches of Government, well just pack one other branch with corrupt GQP, that pack that corrupt court, that installs a trump or DeSatan
.oligarchy, dictatorship, fascism shit hole country like Hungary and Russia. Throw in some Fox, Bannon, Jones and fake God pulpit filling idiot cult heads with hate and bullshit.
Like Jrs Ho shouted from the stage (for $60,000) The Best is Yet to come. We are on the verge of Be Best.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)BlueJac
(7,838 posts)essaynnc
(801 posts)To buy of congress, or at least half of it!!
$5 m per 50 senators, and $1 m for 200 house members. let's see, that adds up to.....CHUMP CHANGE !
REPEAL CITIZENS UNITED !!!!!!!!!
sop
(10,177 posts)The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)We are a fascist nation.
rubbersole
(6,689 posts)If not before. There are hundreds of lobbyists for each member of congress. They get represented.
cbabe
(3,541 posts)Best interest of shareholders? I think not.