General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Urged to Block Biden's Pro-Privatization Nominee for Social Security Board
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/07/05/senate-urged-block-bidens-pro-privatization-nominee-social-security-boardSocial Security Works, a progressive advocacy group, is leading the charge against Biggs, highlighting his role in the George W. Bush administration's failed attempt to privatize the New Deal program in 2005. At the time, Biggs worked on Social Security as an associate director of Bush's National Economic Council.
(snip)
The White House announced Biggs' nomination to the SSAB in May, a move that drew little notice at the time.
(snip)
While Biden vowed on the campaign trail to back an expansion of Social Security, he has previously supported cutting the program's benefits. Biden was vice president when former President Barack Obama proposed a "grand bargain" with the GOP that would have entailed cuts to Social Security.
Call your senators.
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,377 posts)msongs
(73,655 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Between this and the judge in La. I wonder who is making these picks.
H2O Man
(78,993 posts)That is a terrible choice for that position.
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(23,044 posts)Whoever advised Biden to pick Biggs should be fired.
The fact that Biden supported the nomination just makes me shake my head
Mysterian
(6,415 posts)AEI senior fellow.
These are our enemies, Mr. President.
PhylliPretzel
(217 posts)I just sent an email to Sen. Casey and urged my family members to do the same.
Wounded Bear
(64,244 posts)montanacowboy
(6,708 posts)What in the hell is wrong with the President? Jesus, the third rail of politics and he is stepping on it.
Not to mention that Judgeship nomination in Kentucky. Someone has to stop this shit.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(26,890 posts)867-5309.
(1,189 posts)Just why?
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,890 posts)AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)I'm out of words
dalton99a
(93,942 posts)An anti-abortion asshole for federal judge
And then... a privatization asshole for Social Security???
Celerity
(54,294 posts)The Senate can, and must, block this terrible nomination!
Please call your Senators at 202-224-3121 and tell them to vote NO on Andrew Biggs.
Here's a sample script for calling:
Link to tweet
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)This can't be true. Just can't be.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,890 posts)msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)How he had the mandate now, (as evidenced by his second Presidential win) to Privatize Social Sedurity.
I made calls to Senators Feinstein and Boxer, and to Nancy Pelosi... that they HAD to block any attempt to move on that promise.
I was in a state of daily anger and furious, because I felt that election was stolen, Kerry should have won. The reason to go to War on Iraq was obviously pure Poppy Cock which should have been known and obvious to Congress. And now this.
I'm just blown away he had held positions during Obama's years.
gab13by13
(32,121 posts)better plan on not having SS or Medicare. Someone is spending millions of dollars pushing Medicare Advantage on TV.
msfiddlestix
(8,178 posts)dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)I am beyond angry about this.
mopinko
(73,657 posts)throw a spanner in the works.
librechik
(30,957 posts)David__77
(24,609 posts)I think some people are just waiting until bipartisanship returns so that the adults in the room can slash and burn.
Novara
(6,115 posts)CrispyQ
(40,929 posts)Kick, kick, kick.
DLevine
(1,791 posts)gulliver
(13,947 posts)I'm not seeing the data in this post or it's link. That's something I've unfortunately come to expect from commondreams.org. My current conclusion is that the site is unreliable from a political, intellectual, and, therefore, a moral perspective.
Is there some reason Biden supports Biggs? If so, that reason has to be given due consideration in any good faith discussion. It's absolutely, positively an obligation of any OP against a Democratic President on a Democratic board to show they understand the position of said President and have given it due consideration.
That's missing and there's no data. I'm calling a foul on the former. The latter makes this OP irrelevant.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,890 posts)exactly what you say you want:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/13/president-biden-announces-key-nominees-15/
Andrew G. Biggs is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies Social Security reform, state and local government pensions, and public sector pay and benefits. Before joining AEI, Biggs was the Principal Deputy Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), where he oversaw SSAs policy research efforts. As an Associate Director of the White House National Economic Council in 2005, he worked on Social Security reform. In 2001, he joined the staff of the Presidents Commission to Strengthen Social Security. Biggs has been interviewed on radio and television as an expert on retirement issues and on public versus. private sector compensation. He has published widely in academic publications as well as in daily newspapers such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. He has also testified before Congress on numerous occasions. In 2013, the Society of Actuaries appointed Biggs co-vice chair of a blue-ribbon panel tasked with analyzing the causes of underfunding in public pension plans and how governments can securely fund plans in the future. In 2014, Institutional Investor Magazine named him one of the 40 most influential people in the retirement world. In 2016, he was appointed by President Obama to be a member of the financial control board overseeing reforms to Puerto Ricos budget and the restructuring of the islands debts.
gulliver
(13,947 posts)A research leader and Principal Deputy Commissioner in the SSA during the Obama administration? That seems good, not bad. Where's the data that says he isn't good? Where's the data that says he isn't good news for every single current and future Social Security and Medicare beneficiary? Burden's on the poster who (on a Democratic board or, really, any board) is posting against a Democratic President.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,890 posts)
gulliver
(13,947 posts)I take that as agreement with my point
Hotler
(13,747 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(26,890 posts)Response to WhiskeyGrinder (Original post)
denbot This message was self-deleted by its author.