General Discussion

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts) Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:24 PM Jul 2022

It is possible the committee has sensitive evidence they cannot share with us.

Evidence they will share with the DOj. We have probably only seen a fraction of text messages, e-mails, encrypted phones, they have found. There is probably testimony that they will not share with us.

They are giving us a general overview of what happened, to educate the public. Very sensitive evidence for a criminal investigation is probably not being shared with us. It can only be shared with the DOJ.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It is possible the committee has sensitive evidence they cannot share with us. (Original Post) fightforfreedom Jul 2022 OP

I am betting they have plenty more evidence of witness tampering Walleye Jul 2022 #1

Of course, Merrick Garland knows things that we don't know we don't know. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #2

Garland pulls off an historic Double Reverse Rumsfeld... WheelWalker Jul 2022 #4

Especially considering they have interviewed over 1000 people, so far. woodsprite Jul 2022 #3

I think they should tell us everything. We won't tell anyone else. Srkdqltr Jul 2022 #5

That sort of assumes members of the administration think citizens should be mushrooms. Model35mech Jul 2022 #6

You can't release information that may be part of an on going investigation. fightforfreedom Jul 2022 #7

Walleye

(45,404 posts)

1. I am betting they have plenty more evidence of witness tampering

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:30 PM

Jul 2022

gab13by13

(32,760 posts)

2. Of course, Merrick Garland knows things that we don't know we don't know.

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:31 PM

Jul 2022

WheelWalker

(9,415 posts)

4. Garland pulls off an historic Double Reverse Rumsfeld...

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #2)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:45 PM

Jul 2022

He knows the Unknown Unknowns.

woodsprite

(12,592 posts)

3. Especially considering they have interviewed over 1000 people, so far.

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:32 PM

Jul 2022

I'm hoping they have the pot o' gold and the DOJ does the right thing with it.

Srkdqltr

(9,936 posts)

5. I think they should tell us everything. We won't tell anyone else.

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:47 PM

Jul 2022

Than we would shut up and wait.

Model35mech

(2,047 posts)

6. That sort of assumes members of the administration think citizens should be mushrooms.

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 02:59 PM

Jul 2022

The only thing that should be held back, IMO, is intel about operational actions, in place and activated, to catch people with their hands in the cookie jar.

All else, wink, wink, nod, nod there was nothing that's going to happen

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)

7. You can't release information that may be part of an on going investigation.

Reply to Model35mech (Reply #6)

Wed Jul 13, 2022, 03:30 PM

Jul 2022

Reply to this discussion

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.