Republican AG says he'll investigate Indiana doctor who provided care to 10-year-old rape victim
Politico via Yahoo NewsDr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indianapolis, has told multiple outlets that she provided care to the 10-year-old after a child abuse doctor in Ohio contacted her. The child was six weeks and three days into the pregnancy, Bernard said. After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last month, a wave of state-level abortion restrictions took effect, including in Ohio, a state that bans abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, with no exceptions for rape or incest.
“We’re gathering the evidence as we speak, and we’re going to fight this to the end, including looking at her licensure if she failed to report. And in Indiana it’s a crime … to intentionally not report,” state Attorney General Todd Rokita said on Fox News on Wednesday night. “This is a child, and there’s a strong public interest in understanding if someone under the age of 16 or under the age of 18 or really any woman is having abortion in our state. And then if a child is being sexually abused, of course parents need to know. Authorities need to know. Public policy experts need to know.”
= new reply since forum marked as read
...but, apparently, illegal to not have reported the rape of a child to authorities. Who, undoubtedly, would have taken custody of the child "for her own protection" before the procedure and sent her back to Ohio.
In any event, this is what we should expect from the dominionists: when cases like this come up, deny their existence; then, when that becomes impossible, swing into action...to punish the victims and those who came to their aid. (And, obviously, from what some of them have been saying, there should be no questioning that justice is fully-served if the man responsible is arrested and punished, while the 10-year-old is still forced to carry his child. Actually, that's likely an interim solution for them. In the America to come, once they have taken control and put us under Biblical law, the proper way to bring about justice in this case would be to require the guy to marry her.
I'm expecting that, soon, in the interests of "full disclosure," some holy pro-lifer will leak the identity of the 10-year-old... 
And very pissed off. These people are assholes on steroids. 
The whole time I was reading this, I kept wondering why that AG seemed to know SO little about this case that's been ALL OVER the news media in recent weeks. If he'd actually read even one of the many news stories about this that I've read, he'd already know the answers to most of the issues he raised. Authorities don't "need to know" those things; the ones that actually keep up with the news already do know.
Personally, I think he DOES know and is just putting on a big show to impress anti-abortion voters in his state and help himself get reelected in November. It's obvious that he doesn't give a fat rat's ass about that CHILD and all the crap she's been through. All he wants to do is use her as a pawn in some holy crusade that he's ginned up to make himself look like some righteous antiabortion crusader to anti-choice voters. If he makes her life even more difficult in the process, that's just peachy keen and hunky-dory as far as he's concerned, because he is a disgusting piece of trash.
I'm thinking about sending this assipe a little gift from this website: https://dicksbymail.com/collections/bags-of-dicks
J/k; I'd rather donate the money to Stacey Abrams or Beto. But it's fun to fantasize!
Of some very sick people 
