General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLogs show 10 House Republicans attended White House meeting on pressuring Pence
Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen.
Logs show 10 House Republicans attended White House meeting on pressuring Pence
by Andrew Solender
Axios, July 12, 2022
Ten Republican members of Congress attended a Dec. 21 White House meeting focused on efforts to pressure former Vice President Mike Pence to help overturn the 2020 election, according to the Jan. 6 committee.
Why it matters: The revelation underscores how deep the involvement of some lawmakers were in former President Trump's schemes to overturn the election even after the electoral college met to affirm President Biden's victory.
Driving the news: Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.) said at a hearing on Tuesday that White House visitor logs reveal 10 members were physically in attendance:
Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas)
Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.)
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.)
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)
Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.)
Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.)
Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.)
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio)
Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.)
Now-Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.)
The backdrop: Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson told the panel in closed-door testimony that members "felt that [Pence] had the authority to ... [send] the electors back to the States," according to a court filing from April.
Hutchinson noted that "they dialed in a few Members over the course of that meeting."
She mentioned two members Reps. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) and Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) who were not in the visitor logs cited by Murphy.
Source: https://www.axios.com/2022/07/12/house-republicans-jan6-white-house
Who are the others in Congress who went along with treason? Asking for a Democracy.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)I cant remember the details of their voting, but I remember the 147 number.
Kid Berwyn
(24,884 posts)Tommy Tuberville, Ala.
Rick Scott, Fla.
Roger Marshall, Kan.
John Kennedy, La.
Cindy Hyde-Smith, Miss.
Josh Hawley, Mo.
Ted Cruz, Texas
Cynthia Lummis, Wyo.
House
Robert B. Aderholt, Ala.
Mo Brooks, Ala.
Jerry Carl, Ala.
Barry Moore, Ala.
Gary Palmer, Ala.
Mike Rogers, Ala.
Andy Biggs, Ariz.
Paul Gosar, Ariz.
Debbie Lesko, Ariz.
David Schweikert, Ariz.
Rick Crawford, Ark.
Ken Calvert, Calif.
Mike Garcia, Calif.
Darrell Issa, Calif.
Doug LaMalfa, Calif.
Kevin McCarthy, Calif.
Devin Nunes, Calif.
Jay Obernolte, Calif.
Lauren Boebert, Colo.
Doug Lamborn, Colo.
Kat Cammack, Fla.
Mario Diaz-Balart, Fla.
Byron Donalds, Fla.
Neal Dunn, Fla.
Scott Franklin, Fla.
Matt Gaetz, Fla.
Carlos Gimenez, Fla.
Brian Mast, Fla.
Bill Posey, Fla.
John Rutherford, Fla.
Greg Steube, Fla.
Daniel Webster, Fla.
Rick Allen, Ga.
Earl L. "Buddy" Carter, Ga.
Andrew Clyde, Ga.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ga.
Jody Hice, Ga.
Barry Loudermilk, Ga.
Russ Fulcher, Idaho
Mike Bost, Ill.
Mary Miller, Ill.
Jim Baird, Ind.
Jim Banks, Ind.
Greg Pence, Ind.
Jackie Walorski, Ind.
Ron Estes, Kan.
Jacob LaTurner, Kan.
Tracey Mann, Kan.
Harold Rogers, Ky.
Garret Graves, La.
Clay Higgins, La.
Mike Johnson, La.
Steve Scalise, La.
Andy Harris, Md.
Jack Bergman, Mich.
Lisa McClain, Mich.
Tim Walberg, Mich.
Michelle Fischbach, Minn.
Jim Hagedorn, Minn.
Michael Guest, Miss.
Trent Kelly, Miss.
Steven Palazzo, Miss.
Sam Graves, Mo.
Vicky Hartzler, Mo.
Billy Long, Mo.
Blaine Luetkemeyer, Mo.
Jason Smith, Mo.
Matt Rosendale, Mont.
Dan Bishop, N.C.
Ted Budd, N.C.
Madison Cawthorn, N.C.
Virginia Foxx, N.C.
Richard Hudson, N.C.
Gregory F. Murphy, N.C.
David Rouzer, N.C.
Jeff Van Drew, N.J.
Yvette Herrell, N.M.
Chris Jacobs, N.Y.
Nicole Malliotakis, N.Y.
Elise M. Stefanik, N.Y.
Lee Zeldin, N.Y.
Adrian Smith, Neb.
Steve Chabot, Ohio
Warren Davidson, Ohio
Bob Gibbs, Ohio
Bill Johnson, Ohio
Jim Jordan, Ohio
Stephanie Bice, Okla.
Tom Cole, Okla.
Kevin Hern, Okla.
Frank Lucas, Okla.
Markwayne Mullin, Okla.
Cliff Bentz, Ore.
John Joyce, Pa.
Fred Keller, Pa.
Mike Kelly, Pa.
Daniel Meuser, Pa.
Scott Perry, Pa.
Guy Reschenthaler, Pa.
Lloyd Smucker, Pa.
Glenn Thompson, Pa.
Jeff Duncan, S.C.
Ralph Norman, S.C.
Tom Rice, S.C.
William Timmons, S.C.
Joe Wilson, S.C.
Tim Burchett, Tenn.
Scott DesJarlais, Tenn.
Chuck Fleischmann, Tenn.
Mark E. Green, Tenn.
Diana Harshbarger, Tenn.
David Kustoff, Tenn.
John Rose, Tenn.
Jodey Arrington, Texas
Brian Babin, Texas
Michael C. Burgess, Texas
John R. Carter, Texas
Michael Cloud, Texas
Pat Fallon, Texas
Louie Gohmert, Texas
Lance Gooden, Texas
Ronny Jackson, Texas
Troy Nehls, Texas
August Pfluger, Texas
Pete Sessions, Texas
Beth Van Duyne, Texas
Randy Weber, Texas
Roger Williams, Texas
Ron Wright, Texas
Burgess Owens, Utah
Chris Stewart, Utah
Ben Cline, Va.
Bob Good, Va.
Morgan Griffith, Va.
Robert J. Wittman, Va.
Carol Miller, W.Va.
Alexander X. Mooney, W.Va.
Scott Fitzgerald, Wis.
Tom Tiffany, Wis.
Source: The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html
ok_cpu
(2,248 posts)Forced him to retire, even after he sold out. Nothing is enough for that crowd.
Kid Berwyn
(24,884 posts)
One of the email subject areas referred to in the J6 hearing were the proud girl types who promptly volunteered for service on the firing squads.
rampartc
(5,835 posts)and trump endorsed his primary opponent.
Evolve Dammit
(21,807 posts)kacekwl
(9,234 posts)You know what we, trump will do to you if you don't vote our way. Those on the list whether they agreed or not were too weak to defy the order. The fact that many on that list did know they were wrong makes it more tratorus in my book.
Botany
(77,706 posts)Well in the senate we have Josh Hawley and Chuck "I don't think Vice President Pence will
be here for the vote count" Grassely
Kid Berwyn
(24,884 posts)Without that crowd voting down every bill that would bring justice, equality or progress we could really change the future.
As is, all they do is sabotage all that benefits We the People.
PS: US Rep. Greg Pence (T-Ind.), FWIW, voted with the traitors who tried to hang his brother the Vice President.
The other scum buckets are named above in Reply 19.
MissMillie
(39,688 posts)Every single one of these law-breakers is up for re-election.
Every single one was willing to disregard the votes of the people. It's called "Conspiracy to de-fraud the United States."
If THAT isn't a campaign add, I don't know what it.
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)BumRushDaShow
(171,482 posts)Cancun Carival Cruz was in the background working with Eastman to concoct the loony "legal" (in quotes) theories -
by Michael Kranish, The Washington Post March 28, 20223 PM Central
(snip)
An examination by The Washington Post of Cruzs actions between Election Day and Jan. 6, 2021, shows just how deeply he was involved, working directly with Trump to concoct a plan that came closer than widely realized to keeping him in power. As Cruz went to extraordinary lengths to court Trumps base and lay the groundwork for his own potential 2024 presidential bid, he also alienated close allies and longtime friends who accused him of abandoning his principles.
Now, Cruzs efforts are of interest to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, in particular whether Cruz was in contact with Trump lawyer John Eastman, a conservative attorney who has been his friend for decades and who wrote key legal memos aimed at denying Bidens victory.
As Eastman outlined a scenario in which Vice President Mike Pence could deny certifying Bidens election, Cruz crafted a complementary plan in the Senate. He proposed objecting to the results in six swing states and delaying accepting the Electoral College results on Jan. 6 in favor of a 10-day audit thus potentially enabling GOP state legislatures to overturn the result. Ten other senators backed his proposal, which Cruz continued to advocate on the day rioters attacked the Capitol.
The committees interest in Cruz is notable as investigators zero in on how closely Trumps allies coordinated with members of Congress in the attempt to block or delay certifying Bidens victory. If Cruzs plan worked, it could have created enough chaos for Trump to remain in power.
(snip)
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/03/28/ted-cruz-donald-trump/
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)
ancianita
(43,318 posts)They all conspired to obstruct the peaceful transference of power per the 12th Amendment.
BumRushDaShow
(171,482 posts)Including one that is in the 12th Amendment. I.e., -
Amendment XII
(snip)
The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.
(snip)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxii
They wanted to "object" to enough states to sow doubt and try to force not accepting the Electoral College Certificates. This path would somehow magically assume enough votes to actually have that happen despite Democrats controlling the House and in no way going along with that.
So failing the above, they would then declare that because there are "all these objections anyway", then the "election is muddled" and the decision should go back to the states (legislatures) to decide to make the decision by referencing the ambiguous "Electoral Count Act of 1877 as codified here, and where a cacophony of guidance is given for dealing with competing slates of electors and how to decide as noted here.
It's bad enough that the 12th Amendment was ratified to be a fix to the original process established in Article II, Sect. 1, and the Electoral Count Act was again an attempt to correct what is obviously convoluted process in the Constitution.
In any case, the "pomp and circumstance" that we have become accustomed to with respect to what is normally a "ceremonial" process in Congress, is actually a result of what is in the "Electoral Count Act f 1877" but right now, Congress IS working on fixing THAT and I just saw a breaking news on one update to that process -
By Manu Raju and Ted Barrett, CNN
Updated 12:57 PM ET, Thu July 14, 2022
(CNN)Senators from both parties have reached an agreement to clarify that the vice president only has a ceremonial role in overseeing the certification of the electoral results, according to two Senate sources, the first legislative response to former President Donald Trump's pressure campaign to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The agreement will be part of a larger deal to overhaul the Electoral Count Act, which a bipartisan group of senators plans to unveil as soon as next week.
The effort was spawned by Trump's effort to get Congress and then-Vice President Mike Pence to disregard now-President Joe Biden's electoral win and install him into a second term, with senators looking to make it harder to do that future. While constitutional experts and others say the vice president currently can't disregard a state certified electoral result, Trump continually berated Pence over the issue and told him to simply send the matter back to the states.
Pence resisted the effort -- despite being a target of Trump and his mob of supporters who stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The pressure campaign against the vice president has been a key part of the House select committee's investigation into the Capitol Hill insurrection.That larger deal is close to being finalized, with senators meeting Wednesday night saying that they are still ironing out some of the language.
"We're hopeful," said Sen. Joe Manchin, a Democrat of West Virginia, on Wednesday about the timetable for announcing a deal. "We are very close. We have a few technical issues to iron out. And I'm very hopeful we'll have a bill early next week," said Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, on Wednesday who added that because of jurisdictional issues, the group may propose a series of bills to address the needed reforms, but they have not made a decision on that yet.
(snip)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/14/politics/electoral-count-act-agreement-senators/index.html
ancianita
(43,318 posts)ways to do anything beyond what 12A actually says.
Now it's suddenly important to update the Electoral Count Act. I don't trust anything Republicans are involved in.
Under oath, Judge Luttig said "...Donald Trump and allies and supporters are a clear and present danger to American democracy...I would have never spoken those words ever in my life except that thats what the former president and his allies are telling us, as I said in that New York Times op ed wherein I was speaking about the Electoral Count Act of 1887. The former president and his allies are executing that blueprint for 2024 in open and plain view of the American public...."
BumRushDaShow
(171,482 posts)before the attack, but those procedures including an alphabetical roll call of states, reading off the tally, asking for objections, debating the objections in each chamber, etc., is all per the "Electoral Count Act".
The problem is the (sadly correct) assumption that Americans are clueless about the electoral process, and since the GOP has 23 states with trifecta governments out of a total of 28 with GOP governors, if they can somehow throw the decision back to the states (that they control), and I expect some could or would pass a state law changing their election process, then they can control the way Electors are selected by proclaiming "fraud" and then seizing control of that process, ignoring the popular vote, and muddling who is considered the "Executive" of a state (Governor? Secretary of State? ) who would provide the Certificate of Ascertainment.
The states targeted were those that voted for Biden where the GOP either had trifecta control (AZ, GA) or had legislative control (MI, PA, WI).
So updating that Act is of primary importance, again because there is nothing in the 12th Amendment that actually spells as the step-by-step process - and it was only passed because of a historical nightmare elections in 1880 (where the popular vote difference between Garfield (R) and Hancock (D), was less than 2000 votes, although Garfield handily won the Electoral votes).
If anything though, we have seen worse Electoral vs popular vote problems in our lifetimes where the winner of the Presidency lost the popular vote by both 500,000 (in 2000) and 3,000,000 (in 2016), but that issue would require a Constitutional amendment that ain't happening any time soon.
In any case, that law hds been used generally without all the drama (including having members "objecting" to state counts from either party but all of those objections being cast aside due to not meeting the full requirement to move forward with a debate) for 140+ years leading up to 2020.
As Trumps failed pressure campaign targeting state officials underscores, the most potent threat to the orderly transfer of power is not disruption of the joint session itself, but malfeasance in the states beforehand.
Experts agree that the Electoral Count Act does not authorize state officials to arbitrarily set aside election results and that doing so would be illegal. But unscrupulous actors may still try to exploit the laws vague provisions especially those allowing a state legislature to appoint electors if the state fails to make a choice on Election Day and fill elector vacancies by law to justify tampering with presidential election results. Many state legislators have in fact expressed sympathy or outright support for claims the 2020 election was stolen, as have a number of leading candidates for governor and secretary of state in key swing states making the central role the law assigns to a states executive another potential source of mischief.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/how-fix-electoral-count-act
So there are a number of orgs and members of Congress who want to clean this up and there have been some interesting recommendations. The good thing is that there has been bipartisan agreement regarding the need to fix it and it goes beyond the insurrectionists in Congress. It must happen now before more loons get elected to office and this country will truly be toast.
ancianita
(43,318 posts)Hoping for party unity on this and bipartisan agreement is in the Senate.
Paladin
(32,354 posts)turbinetree
(27,662 posts)think I will go down to the Bel Air office with a sign in the coming days......and stand out on the sidewalk where I can exercise my First Amendment Right .......that he wanted to take away from all Maryland voters and across this country ......he wanted to over throw a duly elected government.......and install a traitor...install a fucking traitor.......
Old Okie
(221 posts)Is anyone running against him, anyplace I can send money. Fellow Marylander but not in his district.
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,237 posts)R. David Harden, Carroll County
Heather R. Mizeur, Kent County
Stinky The Clown
(68,959 posts)Who the fuck does he think will believe that? Just right wing BULLSHIT.
And I would bet anything he's watched every minute of the hearings cuz he knows his own ass is in the noose.
Traildogbob
(13,136 posts)Was the follow up question? Give an example of anything you are WORKING so hard on to accomplish any of that. Do you mean GUN violence? I get it, Chunk Toad killed the follow up for GQP.
Hotler
(13,747 posts)Response to Kid Berwyn (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)Lock them up, along with all the other treasonous traitors who voted to destroy democracy.
Martin68
(27,984 posts)stop the electoral count.
AntiFascist
(13,756 posts)...
Raiklin first posted the Pence Card document on his social media accounts in mid-December 2020.
Trump appeared to endorse the plan, retweeting one of Raiklins posts about the Pence Card on Dec. 23, 2020.
Raiklin posted his plan weeks before conservative attorney John Eastman drafted his own memo outlining a similar plan, which was embraced by Trump despite warnings it was not legally sound.
Raiklin served as a Green Beret and at the Defense Intelligence Agency. He has known Flynn for several years.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/january-6-hearings-june-16/h_5cb75e4babd00cc7b68a62e35a09fa68
Emile
(42,983 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)He is complicit as well.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)To stop the overthrow of our democracy and the destruction of our constitutional rights?
Hassler
(4,947 posts)They knew she'd blab about it.
pwb
(12,788 posts)Now they are sought out by our Wealth owned media.
Cha
(320,161 posts)Focus!
Please Fight to Save Our Democracy💙 in 2022 & 2024!
Snoopy 7
(731 posts)Both of the two TRAITORS are in close proximity to each others district. The districts are mainly rural and quite "red". Their constituents won't do anything to them because they agree with them.