General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClarence Thomas Wants to End Marriage Equality. He Has Two Different Strategies to Do It.
Mother JonesThomas argument, which none of his colleagues joined, set off alarm bells among legal scholars and advocates for LGBTQ and reproductive rights. But thenin a separate opinion three days later that received far less attentionhe laid out an alternate route to gut same-sex marriage and other personal freedoms: allowing government officials to simply refuse to recognize Americans constitutional rights if they claim those rights conflict with their own religious values.
As the court has moved swiftly to enact its conservative agenda on everything from abortion to religion to guns to climate change, Thomas own reputation has shifted with it. Once considered the courts outlier, he is now viewed as its right-wing trailblazer. Now firmly in the majority, hes turning his arch-conservative worldview into the nations reality. If theres anything this past term has taught us, its to take seriously the possibility that Thomas and his conservative colleagues will not hesitate to make radical changes to American life.
Thomas has laid out two paths to achieve his social agenda. One, as the public quickly took note of, is to boldly overturn the cases that recognized the constitutional right to same-sex marriage and struck down bans on sodomy and contraception. This would allow state legislatures to prohibit these things outright. Thomas other strategy is more subtle, but it, too, would erode some of the rights we take for granted today, particularly marriage equality. Importantly, Thomas is not making an either/or proposition here; its clear that he wants to pursue both paths.
On June 27, the courts conservative 6-3 majority ruled in favor of a public school football coach who had been fired for leading prayers at the 50-yard-lineone of multiple religion cases this term in which the conservatives whittled away at the separation of church and state. In this case, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, the court privileged the coachs free exercise and free speech rights under the First Amendment over the Establishment Clauses protection against the government favoring or instituting a religion. Thomas joined this ruling and, in a concurring opinion, called for the court to expand religious free exercise rights for public employees.
The Court refrains from deciding whether or how public employees rights under the Free Exercise Clause may or may not be different from those enjoyed by the general public, Thomas wrote.
NameAlreadyTaken
(981 posts)MOMFUDSKI
(5,637 posts)be against women having the right to vote. Bet that is on THE LIST.
elias7
(4,026 posts)Trueblue1968
(17,238 posts)Marcuse
(7,506 posts)bahboo
(16,355 posts)and now he's trying to radically change our society to his warped vision. What the fuck...
In It to Win It
(8,283 posts)so the power is going to his head.
budkin
(6,714 posts)Because conservatives helped so much?
Aussie105
(5,429 posts)Welcome to the 18th century!
Witch trials, Church ruling the place, put women in inferior roles, bring back slavery!
Of course, all weapons out there in civilian land need to be replaced with time appropriate muzzle loaders.
And be ready! The British are coming!
I guess . . . this is Clarence's vision of the time America was great, and he wants to make it great again?
NowISeetheLight
(3,943 posts)It would seem to me that making laws allowing people to do whatever they want in the name of religion is in fact establishing a religion.
Maybe we need a "Joseph Smith Mormons" type of event. You can say God sent angels to you, He revealed Jesus was gay, create your own religious text supporting homosexuality, then adopt it as a religion. I mean basically that's all it would take? Of course then you'd have one religion going up against another. I can guess which one Reverend Thomas would say is law.