Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's clarify this foolishness..... (Original Post) 634-5789 Jul 2022 OP
K&R brush Jul 2022 #1
or even 1 other person. ffs mopinko Jul 2022 #2
What they are saying is that if I don't believe their fantasy... dchill Jul 2022 #3
Taliban with Nukes at that. Lucky Luciano Jul 2022 #5
Again, those damned xians have appropriated a Hebrew word for "praise ye JHWH" erronis Jul 2022 #6
... Nevilledog Jul 2022 #22
K&R Blue Owl Jul 2022 #4
Well said. Fla Dem Jul 2022 #7
I love it, except for one... 2naSalit Jul 2022 #8
Jesus: Knock, knock. Let me in. OMGWTF Jul 2022 #9
The short explanation gratuitous Jul 2022 #10
+1 Celerity Jul 2022 #34
He told ME not to. He told ME to do Y. dchill Jul 2022 #42
No one needs an imaginary super Daddy in the sky Farmer-Rick Jul 2022 #11
No one needs an imaginary super Daddy in the sky Slammer Jul 2022 #46
K & R...nt Wounded Bear Jul 2022 #12
And what "Jesus" is it that they think PatSeg Jul 2022 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author wnylib Jul 2022 #30
+1000 wnylib Jul 2022 #31
Exactly. efhmc Jul 2022 #36
Old Time Religion orthoclad Jul 2022 #40
Yes, the Eye-for-an-eye crowd PatSeg Jul 2022 #48
Yep. Not "turn the other cheek", orthoclad Jul 2022 #57
Yes, the Old Testament PatSeg Jul 2022 #59
A good argument could be made orthoclad Jul 2022 #60
Oh, that is a really good point PatSeg Jul 2022 #61
Well said, spot on. KPN Jul 2022 #55
Current American Christianity will suffer a huge blowback from this era unless PufPuf23 Jul 2022 #14
The mainline churches ARE in opposition to wnylib Jul 2022 #33
The schisms in U.S. Catholic Church reflect those of the U.S.A. itself. hunter Jul 2022 #54
They are "in it to win it" or "all in" shall we say. KPN Jul 2022 #56
Could not have said it better myself. n/t Paper Roses Jul 2022 #15
In my travels yesterday I saw a house with signs I've not seen before. llmart Jul 2022 #16
Jesus 2024 signs are much more disturbing and frightening than Trump 2024 signs. Mariana Jul 2022 #58
My eggs do not belong to them. Cracklin Charlie Jul 2022 #17
K&R MustLoveBeagles Jul 2022 #18
Amen and amen Tree Lady Jul 2022 #19
Absolutely! Rebl2 Jul 2022 #20
I've felt this way for a while now EnergizedLib Jul 2022 #21
Our constitution gives us freedom from a state religion IronLionZion Jul 2022 #23
my late mom warned that they have always wanted a non constitutional theocracy . not all AllaN01Bear Jul 2022 #24
+1000 wnylib Jul 2022 #35
We did them a favor dwilso40641 Jul 2022 #25
They'd stop reading after the first sentence Quanto Magnus Jul 2022 #26
Dominionism runs Deep-State. czarjak Jul 2022 #27
The people who say that we need Jesus have nakocal Jul 2022 #28
"This is our country, not your church" IcyPeas Jul 2022 #29
apparently they ARE allowed to let it control the country Skittles Jul 2022 #32
We will EnergizedLib Jul 2022 #37
repukes are working on that too Skittles Jul 2022 #38
That's why we can't get discouraged EnergizedLib Jul 2022 #39
I'm not a historian - soldierant Jul 2022 #41
Exactly. niyad Jul 2022 #43
Fuck yeah.., YoshidaYui Jul 2022 #44
Legally, religion needs to be keets Jul 2022 #45
Welcome to DU. Interesting idea. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2022 #47
Casual public nudity doesn't bother me... hunter Jul 2022 #52
One might say that about anyone whose opinion another disagrees with. marble falls Jul 2022 #62
Something I've been 'sharing' with the 'Hypo-Christians': Frostlight Jul 2022 #49
K and effing R! geardaddy Jul 2022 #50
Control keithbvadu2 Jul 2022 #51
That's It Right There WiVoter Jul 2022 #53

dchill

(42,660 posts)
3. What they are saying is that if I don't believe their fantasy...
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 02:23 PM
Jul 2022

...then I don't have any rights. And if I believe in some other religious fantasy? No rights. It's Taliban time in Christendom. Congratulations and Hallelujah!

erronis

(23,869 posts)
6. Again, those damned xians have appropriated a Hebrew word for "praise ye JHWH"
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 02:49 PM
Jul 2022

That's all those people do - try to take over customs and idioms from earlier (and probably better) groups.

And if the RWNJs really want to emulate the Taliban, they probably should learn a bit of Arabic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhamdulillah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takbir

I doubt those pseudo-xians are really interested in other cultures though. Other than white, male, entitled, land-owners, and members of the right country clubs.

2naSalit

(102,778 posts)
8. I love it, except for one...
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 02:58 PM
Jul 2022

Word:

You're allowed to let your religion control your own life. But you are not allowed to make it control the entire country.

OMGWTF

(5,131 posts)
9. Jesus: Knock, knock. Let me in.
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 02:59 PM
Jul 2022

Me: Why?

Jesus: To save you from the things I'm going to do to you if you don't let me in.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
10. The short explanation
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 03:01 PM
Jul 2022

"I do X (where "X" is some personal or spiritual practice) because God told me to do X." Good for you. No problem.

"God told me to do X, so you have to do X." Problem.

Farmer-Rick

(12,663 posts)
11. No one needs an imaginary super Daddy in the sky
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 03:08 PM
Jul 2022

It's ridiculous that people, who believe in an imaginary being that there is no sufficient evidence for, are trying to control every woman in our country. They are controlling women with imaginary magical ideas that have no logical, social or medical purpose.

This is crazy. Religion is a scam and has always been a tool of the filthy rich to abuse others. The fact that anyone believes these myths amazes me. The fact that they use these myths to gain abusive control of people who don't believe in their magical beings is mind boggling....their silly little stories of an ancient Jewish goat herder are riddled with inconsistency and bizarre superstitious ideas.

Christians need to mind their own business, keep their supernatural idiocy to themselves and leave women's uteruses alone.

Slammer

(714 posts)
46. No one needs an imaginary super Daddy in the sky
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 05:35 AM
Jul 2022

I may not need him.

But I've found great joy and comfort in Superman comic books for a number of decades.

PatSeg

(53,214 posts)
13. And what "Jesus" is it that they think
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 03:18 PM
Jul 2022

the country needs? Certainly not that guy in the New Testament, because these fools ignore pretty much everything he said and embrace most of the things he said not to do. They've hijacked the name and left behind his teachings (they do the same thing with the Founding Fathers and the Constitution). They are the kind of hypocrites that Jesus warned his followers about.

Response to PatSeg (Reply #13)

orthoclad

(4,728 posts)
40. Old Time Religion
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 09:48 PM
Jul 2022

They want the Old Testament Jehova/Zeus patriarch, smiting enemies and putting cities to the sword.

PatSeg

(53,214 posts)
48. Yes, the Eye-for-an-eye crowd
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 08:50 AM
Jul 2022

They don't have much use for all that new-fangled stuff like "love thy enemy" or "judge not". Apparently not big fans of sequels, but they'll use the teacher's name anyway. It has a nice ring to it.

orthoclad

(4,728 posts)
57. Yep. Not "turn the other cheek",
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 06:58 PM
Jul 2022

"smite the other cheek".

Honestly, in Bible class when I was little, the Old Testament was more fun. More war stories. Maybe that's what sticks in the mind of some people. "Arrested development" comes to mind. They didn't teach us kids the adultery, drunkenness, rape, and incest parts, though. Nowadays, they'd be calling that "grooming".

Remember Alex in A Clockwork Orange? He went to prison and fantasized, gloried, in reading all the nasty parts of the OT. They thought he got religion and gave him a job with the prison preacher.

PatSeg

(53,214 posts)
59. Yes, the Old Testament
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 09:42 PM
Jul 2022

was much more exciting and dramatic, as well as terribly gory and violent. You can find pretty much anything in the Old Testament, though not much spirituality.

I'd forgotten that about A Clockwork Orange. Sums it up quite well.

Welcome to DU!

orthoclad

(4,728 posts)
60. A good argument could be made
Tue Jul 19, 2022, 11:01 AM
Jul 2022

to ban the Bible in schools and libraries, according to current book-banning standards. I think some people are making that case.

I had a "discussion" with a christofascist a few years ago. He cited the OT to say Trump, despite his serial adultery etc., was doing God's work, referring to some OT king or other. I told him his only interest was in having temporal power over other people. He was surprised that an atheist didn't care what he worshipped. I keep wishing I'd said "I don't give a damn." There is absolutely no point in trying to reason with people who think "faith" trumps reality.

They don't believe IN God; they believe they ARE God, by proxy. They only understand power.

I had more success decades ago with a Jehovah's Witness who asked me if I knew what a watchtower was. I said yes, it's a 4.77 megahertz square wave guarding against rabid raccoons. After a blank stare, we both laughed. Bypass the debate and go for the human response. Answer nonsense with nonsense.

Thanks, good to "see" you.

PatSeg

(53,214 posts)
61. Oh, that is a really good point
Tue Jul 19, 2022, 02:25 PM
Jul 2022

There is so much in the Old Testament that the average parent would find unsuitable for children, even for a lot adults actually.

The problem I've had discussing or debating an issue with devout Christians is whenever I come up with something they can't explain, their first reaction is: "Well the Bible says blah, blah, blah." So any reasonable dialogue is immediately shut down. I've even tried using the bible as a counter-argument and all of a sudden that "Word of God", infallible book has a few passages that have been misinterpreted and need some artful clarification to adjust it to their already established beliefs.

Many years ago, I got into a discussion with a Southern Baptist minister in Texas. He was trying to save my soul (my landlord was also a Baptist minister). He actually told me that Jesus NEVER drank wine and the wine mentioned in the bible was referring to "fruit juice"! It took everything I had to not bust up laughing. I don't remember too much more of the conversation, but when he left, he looked quite befuddled and uncomfortable. I guess he'd never tried that crap on a northerner before. He never did come back and my landlord quit trying to get me to attend Wednesday night prayer meetings.

As for Jehovah's Witnesses, I have had some very good talks with a few. Like you, I went more for the human response and they relaxed and enjoyed the encounter, knowing full well that I was never going to be converted. I just treated them like people and it must have been refreshing after having so many doors slammed in their face.

Good talk!

PufPuf23

(9,852 posts)
14. Current American Christianity will suffer a huge blowback from this era unless
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 03:27 PM
Jul 2022

they manage to destroy the USA or much of humanity.

Just disgusting.

Christians in mass should be putting their own house in order, not bullying others to accept their hateful delusions.

wnylib

(26,008 posts)
33. The mainline churches ARE in opposition to
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 07:35 PM
Jul 2022

what the Evangelicals are doing. Well, the mainline churches, except for Catholicism.

Within the churches, they treat the Cathogelicals as a religious and moral issue, not a political one because of separation of church and state. But their members are politically active outside of the churches, fighting against today's fascism.

hunter

(40,688 posts)
54. The schisms in U.S. Catholic Church reflect those of the U.S.A. itself.
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 11:59 AM
Jul 2022

The Joe Biden / Nancy Pelosi Catholics have little in common with the Clarence Thomas / Brett Kavanaugh / Amy Coney Barrett "conservative" Catholics.

Most religions have embraced authoritarianism, fascism, nationalism, etc., at some point in their histories.

KPN

(17,376 posts)
56. They are "in it to win it" or "all in" shall we say.
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 02:19 PM
Jul 2022

So that “unless” is a huge unless. We’ve got a battle on our hands. They think they are fighting a crusade — a holy war. Undoubtedly, there will be violence. The question is how much and to what extent spatially and temporarily.

llmart

(17,614 posts)
16. In my travels yesterday I saw a house with signs I've not seen before.
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 03:53 PM
Jul 2022

This is probably in a Trump area of my county, but where I expected to see Trump 2024 signs I saw Jesus 2024 signs.

I'll wager a bet this is the new Trumper meme. They know on some level that Trump is toxic. We've gone from Teabaggers to Trumpers to Xians, but they're still the same people.

Mariana

(15,624 posts)
58. Jesus 2024 signs are much more disturbing and frightening than Trump 2024 signs.
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 07:19 PM
Jul 2022

The people displaying those signs are campaigning for a theocracy, and they aren't even pretending otherwise.

Tree Lady

(13,282 posts)
19. Amen and amen
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 03:56 PM
Jul 2022

But unfortunately until a few generations die off religion will lead since most leaders are older. More and more younger not religious.

EnergizedLib

(3,034 posts)
21. I've felt this way for a while now
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 04:12 PM
Jul 2022

That I am more scared of a Christofascist than I am a jihadist. I know jihadists will never get a majority into government and implement Sharia Law.

Furthermore, why should we respect the Second Amendment if they don’t respect the First?

IronLionZion

(51,267 posts)
23. Our constitution gives us freedom from a state religion
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 04:52 PM
Jul 2022

Very first part of the first amendment and the second part is on prohibiting someone else's religion.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

AllaN01Bear

(29,483 posts)
24. my late mom warned that they have always wanted a non constitutional theocracy . not all
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 05:41 PM
Jul 2022

christians are like those fake " christians ." many of us put our money where our mouth is by doing gods work quietly unlike these folks.

dwilso40641

(203 posts)
25. We did them a favor
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 05:45 PM
Jul 2022

by making them tax exempt. Now they have lots of money to buy people and corps. Around here they are buying hospitals and Dr. offices.
They are truly the Christian Taliban.
Its time to start taxing them or they will turn us into No. Korea.

nakocal

(625 posts)
28. The people who say that we need Jesus have
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 06:37 PM
Jul 2022

never met one of his teachings that they couldn't ignore.

Skittles

(171,697 posts)
32. apparently they ARE allowed to let it control the country
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 07:31 PM
Jul 2022

who exactly is going to stop the thoroughly hacked Supreme Court?

EnergizedLib

(3,034 posts)
37. We will
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 07:47 PM
Jul 2022

We vote, we win midterms, we expand the Court and add four new liberal justices.

Well, it’s something, at least.

Skittles

(171,697 posts)
38. repukes are working on that too
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 08:00 PM
Jul 2022

with non-stop voter suppression efforts

anyone who truly cares about America needs to VOTE Democratic

EnergizedLib

(3,034 posts)
39. That's why we can't get discouraged
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 08:06 PM
Jul 2022

We need to want this bad enough, stand in line however long it takes and get to the polls. We must not be defeatist about this and fight against these laws.

soldierant

(9,354 posts)
41. I'm not a historian -
Sun Jul 17, 2022, 09:57 PM
Jul 2022

my two bachekors and one masters are in other fields, and my professional like has been in still other fields.

But how much og a historian does one have to be to realize that evry theocracy which has ever existed has been a disaster for everyione within reach?

It isn't (just) that the state becomes corrupt - the church becomes even more corrupt.

YoshidaYui

(45,406 posts)
44. Fuck yeah..,
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 12:06 AM
Jul 2022

I am a buddhist. If Christofascists have their way, me and my religion will be set on FIRE... AND BURNED away, or maybe I will become some one's slave, because they will bring that back as well

keets

(13 posts)
45. Legally, religion needs to be
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 03:33 AM
Jul 2022

treated like the genitals.

• ILLEGAL to expose in public (what you do in you own home is your business)

• ILLEGAL to force upon others (i.e. rape)

hunter

(40,688 posts)
52. Casual public nudity doesn't bother me...
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 11:26 AM
Jul 2022

... but don't be pleasuring yourself in public, especially around the schoolyards and playgrounds.

Teachers who expose themselves in public schools should be fired, religious schools shouldn't get any public funding.

Welcome to DU.

 

Frostlight

(90 posts)
49. Something I've been 'sharing' with the 'Hypo-Christians':
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 09:30 AM
Jul 2022
I’m Just the Messenger.

Hi. I’m an R/A in a Christian Discipleship program. For the last two years I have studied, not merely read, *studied* The Bible in depth. I have gone to the original Hebrew and Koine Greek many times in doing so. I can tell you two important things:
1) The VAST majority of today’s ‘Christians’ do not actually understand The Bible anywhere near as much as they claim to or should.
2) Today’s ‘Christians’ and their notably un-Christian attitude are WHY young people are no longer joining the Church, and why the numbers of the Church are in sharp decline.
https://www.pewforum.org/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/

And here is the explanation:

When the younger generations see the words and behavior of today’s Christians, they see hateful, insane people.
Now, you can argue against that until you’re blue in the face, but you might as well go outside and try to blow out the Sun… because it’s a fact whether you like it or not.
James 1: 19 If you want to save the Church.
-You are trying to tell today’s young people NOT to believe things they already know to be true. Let’s say you learn about viruses in high school biology. You see them under a microscope for yourself. You read the studies, hear the explanations, learn why the treatments work. You have been ‘educated’ about viruses.
Then a group comes along and they are going around telling everyone viruses don’t exist, it’s really ‘demons’ that cause sickness.
Having SEEN viruses and LEARNED how they work, someone is trying to *indoctrinate* you with a belief that is completely at odds with a reality you know for a fact to be true.

What do you think of those people?

They’re CRAZY.

The problem here is that most of today’s ‘Christians’ don’t know the difference between ‘education’ and ‘indoctrination’.They seem to think they’re the same because they don’t understand how ‘education’ works.
Indoctrination is me telling you that 2+2=4, and you must believe it. Since I’m an authority (such as a teacher) that you were told by another authority (your parents) to listen to, you accept what I tell you to believe. That’s ‘indoctrination’.
“Education” is when I tell you that 2+2=4, and THEN I SHOW YOU HOW 2+2=4 by taking four sticks, separating them into two sets of two each, then letting you put them all together and count them for yourself. That’s ‘education’. Now you KNOW WHY and HOW 2+2=4.
Now, if someone comes along and tries to tell you that 2+2=9, no matter how much authority they have, they sound stupid to you.

That is what you are trying to do with the younger generation. They have gay friends whom they love. They have been *educated* that it is not a ‘choice’, that they were born that way, and that they are harming no one.
Then along you guys come screeching and railing that it’s an ‘abomination’ and a ‘sickness’ and ‘against God!’. They laugh at how ridiculous you sound. It’s no different than trying to tell them that 2+2=9.

Some of you are thinking, “But what we learned from The Bible is 2+2=4! It’s a FACT!”
Sorry, but it doesn’t work that way… mostly because you don’t understand The Bible to begin with. You just believe what you were TOLD to believe about what it said, and part of that problem lies in the translations.
As I said, I’ve read the original Hebrew and Koine Greek. Sadly, contemporary translations cannot reflect the correct vernacular and culture of the times of the original events. So when you say that The Bible is the ‘inerrant Word of God’, you’re talking about the original texts, not the English translations you’re used to.
So let’s look at your justifications for hating homosexuals (you’re not fooling anyone with your ‘love the sinner, hate the sin’ line. The true love of Christ is unconditional):

The Old Testament.

If you’re quoting the OT to justify your homophobia, you’ve FAILED as Christians (We fail all the time. It’s our responsibility to learn and grow). In doing so, you’re demonstrating that you have failed to understand Peter’s vision on the road AND the whole concept of the fulfillment of the Law.
This is one of those places that Christians are shooting themselves in the foot and making complete hypocrites of themselves. There is NO justification for using the OT unless you are an orthodox Jew. Otherwise, here you are eating shellfish, getting tattoos, eating bacon cheeseburgers, wearing clothes of different fabrics, and doing SO MANY THINGS that the OT forbids that you look like complete fools when you quote Leviticus to condemn homosexuality. The sad part is that you don’t even know WHY the OT condemns it. Let me fill you in: In Deuteronomy, the Jews were in desperate straights. They were surrounded by enemies and often outnumbered. They needed to FIX that. How? By making babies and growing them into soldiers. They needed NUMBERS. Yes, God helped and guided them and delivered victory to them WHEN THEY DID WHAT THEY WERE TOLD. One of the things God told them was ‘don’t waste sperm’. “Thou shall not lie with another man as a woman” was because gay sex couldn’t result in the production of children the Jews desperately needed.
https://www.umsl.edu/~safezone/files/pdfs/Manual/14-The%20Bible%20and%20Homosexuality.pdf

Neither any of the prophets before and after Moses (in the OT) nor Christ Himself or any of his disciples who new him before the crucifixion said anything about homosexuality. That leaves two: Paul and Timothy. Timothy was instructed almost entirely by Paul. So that means ‘Just Paul’. The first thing to keep in mind is that Paul is a former Pharisee; Saul of Tarsus. He’s ingrained deeply with the Old Testament. Naturally, this means nothing given the Fulfillment of the Law, but it speaks to Paul’s inclinations. Second is Paul’s whole point: ‘Lustful behavior is wrong’. Paul is literally against marriage to begin with, 1 Corintians 7: 8-9: “8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.”
The ONLY reason Paul gives for getting married is so that you can sate your lusts without offending The Spirit. That puts ALL sexual behavior outside of marriage in the ‘forbidden’ box. Further, Paul doesn’t merely say that it’s a ‘sin’ for two men to have sex, he specifically uses the word ‘Arsenokoitai’. That was a ‘hapax legomania’ in Koine Greek at the time Paul wrote it: a word that only occurs once, and for one purpose, in a given language. Scholars are a bit confused over his use of the word, but it likely means “One who takes advantage”.
https://www.westarinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Malakoi-Arsenokoitai-3.1.pdf
That means ‘men (malokoi) taking sexual advantage of ‘call boys’(arsenokoitai) ’. Paul was specifically referring, most likely to men engaging young male prostitutes. That still doesn’t change the fact that Paul was putting ALL sexual behavior outside of marriage at the same level.

So here’s the problem: Here you guys are, screeching and clawing with fear and hatred. You’re openly panicking over something that can’t hurt you, won’t harm your families, isn’t going to ‘destroy society’ anymore than when your same historical counterparts said interracial marriage would… and young people are looking at their gay friends, who aren’t hurting or ‘pushing’ anything on anyone, not behaving any differently than they or their straight friends are (except for who they date), and then they look at you people and what do they see?

Insane, hateful, fearful, angry, dangerous HYPOCRITES.

And that, my brothers and sisters, is why the Church is disappearing ever faster with each generation. If you want to prevent that, stop hating people who aren’t harming anyone.

You just look insane.


Feel free to share. If you want to attribute it, it's by "Garth S. Croft"
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's clarify this foolis...