General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlease stop using the term 'pro life'.
Their actual position is forced birth. They most certainly are not pro life.
Reject their framing. Change the terms of the discussion.
onecaliberal
(32,781 posts)Magoo48
(4,698 posts)onecaliberal
(32,781 posts)Magoo48
(4,698 posts)wnylib
(21,346 posts)While we're at it, we could also drop the phrase "late term abortion."
Lasher
(27,541 posts)That's how they were initially described, if memory serves. And that label is still being used today. Back in the day, GOP word merchants didn't like the negativity that was projected, so they reframed it to pro-life. Much better, they are in favor of life. Who could oppose such a thing?
Anti-abortion works best for me. Because that's just what they are.
Greybnk48
(10,162 posts)The terms "pro-life" and "conservative" are like baby Bush calling his environmental policy the "Blue Skies" initiative.
It's 1984 bullshit "doublespeak" to brainwash people to believe "doublethink."
ariadne0614
(1,704 posts)sop
(10,105 posts)FM123
(10,053 posts)They are not pro-life they are anti-choice.
Leith
(7,808 posts)they are forced birthers and proud of it.
housecat
(3,121 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,140 posts)They allow some people sometimes to make choices like wearing masks and not getting vaccinated. It's fine for men to choose sex, just not women.
I think using anti-choice makes us sound like we forgot about mask wearing and vaccines. That we don't know men can choose sex. They think women do have a choice to get pregnant or not to get pregnant. That once pregnant you are done having choices.
Even though we all know consent to have sex is not consent to get pregnant or to stay pregnant, they think having sex should have as painful of repercussions for women as is possible. But it's fine for men to have sex with as many females as possible. Just like the ancient goat herders with their 20 wives. But women need to suffer and possibly die for having sex.
I think forced birth is a more accurate description. They want every one of those tiny embryos implanted in a uterus to go thru to birth. It doesn't matter what awful things may befall the mother or the fetus. It doesn't even matter, in some states, if the mother alone or the mother and fetus will die.
Each human embryo must be allowed to go through to birth no matter who dies. That embryo has special magical rights to use another person's body without their consent. The woman has no rights once that egg is fertilized. That is forced birth.
ZZenith
(4,115 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)temporary311
(955 posts)on always using the right wing framing. When you do that, you've already lost.
Celerity
(43,123 posts)Maraya1969
(22,462 posts)And they think the death penalty is OK.
I wonder how one of them would answer this: "If it could be guaranteed that no more abortions ever happened if you give up all your guns would you do it?"
I bet there would be a big pause followed by "ems" and "ers" and then some explanation as to why they would keep their guns.
Emile
(22,505 posts)I like it!
SilasSouleII
(361 posts)+1
Martin Eden
(12,847 posts)Women will DIE as a result of anti-abortion laws.
Isn't enough that people are already dying as a result of Republican policies on guns, policing, healthcare, and the environment?
More like a death cult than pro-life, including the death of our democracy at the hands of Christo-fascists.
ancianita
(35,939 posts)DFW
(54,302 posts)They are for killing women when it's a question of saving them or forbidding an abortion.
They are invariably for killing animals and eating them
They are invariably in favor of the death penalty
They habitually quote passages from their bible where their deity kills people for not doing exactly what THEY want.
They are "pro-life" like they are "pro-shark bite."
GB_RN
(2,334 posts)Depending on who theyre talking about. You know, like a high-profile Democrat, or abortion provider, etc.
DFW
(54,302 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,964 posts)EmmaLee E
(169 posts)ShazzieB
(16,284 posts)I think it says everything that needs to be said, really.
BadgerMom
(2,770 posts)I stopped using their terma liesome time ago.
mrsadm
(1,198 posts)gristy
(10,667 posts)I had used anti-abortion for years. "Pro life" has not been by folks on this board since, well, forever.
DickKessler
(364 posts)Sky Jewels
(7,019 posts)Yes it is.
ypsiguy
(67 posts)Now there's a term that would send the Qanon types reeling.
MiHale
(9,664 posts)Or for individuals add an er at the end of birth.
Sky Jewels
(7,019 posts)I can't believe some progressives still use that bullshit framing.
Gore1FL
(21,102 posts)Life on earth began over 3.5 Billion years ago. It hasn't started or stopped since. The argument is when an individual begins. Making it "life" simply pollutes the discussion with hyperbole.
ShazzieB
(16,284 posts)It makes an end run about all those pointless diatribes about "when life begins" and gets right to what really matters.
I've never really understood the whole obsession with pinpointing the so-called beginning of life anyway. Maybe it's because I wasn't raised in a faith tradition where that was emphasized (or really made an issue of at all, really). But for whatever reason, when anti-choicers start pontificating on how a set of unique human DNA is present from conception onwards, my reaction has always been, "Yeah, so...?"
To me, that has always seemed neither here nor there in terms of whether abortion should be legal. I just don't get it. And yet, it seems to be such a HUGE bfd to some people. I. Don't. Get. It.
JohnnyRingo
(18,619 posts)Then we would be pro abortion.
That sounds a bit unsavory.
mwooldri
(10,301 posts)Like anyone would on purpose go get pregnant and then wait a while and go terminate that pregnancy by choice.
So you're right IMO. It is unsavoury.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,308 posts)Voltaire2
(12,963 posts)It is incredibly safe and effective.
mwooldri
(10,301 posts)Sorry, may have not made myself 1,000,000,000 % clear.
In terms of the procedure itself, yes effective and safe. In terms of whether this medical procedure should be available to all who need it, again yes. I suppose in this sense I'm "pro abortion". Abortion is a medical procedure, the decision of which should be between patient and doctor. Politicians should butt out.
I've tried to think of an analogy here that makes sense, but I'm not the most eloquent of people around... I'll try anyway - so the best I came up with is "want" Vs "need". I don't think anyone wants an abortion, but people who need an abortion want to be able to get one. People who need an abortion fall into two camps - unwanted pregnancy and wanted pregnancies that aren't viable or would kill the patient. Those who didn't want to get pregnant certainly didn't want to have to have an abortion. But they need it for ... well none of my business but they need it. Those who have an ectopic pregnancy, a non viable foetus, or whatever certainly didn't want to end their pregnancy but they need to for xyz reason.
So in the fight against the anti abortion lobby, it's all about messaging. The anti abortion lobby have to be honest been pretty successful in pushing their message. They have certainly turned "pro abortion" into a negative message of "baby killing" - which abortion is not (and besides baby killing is against the law). They also hijacked the term "pro life" quite successfully.
As I said I'm not the best with words. But I know "pro abortion" isn't a winning message. "Pro Choice" is better. In my mind the "pro abortion" people (pro as in having the ability to receive this vital medical care) are the true pro life people - after all pregnancy and abortion is a complicated health issue that needs expert help and the choice between patient and doctor results in a better life for the patient. Denying access to certain medical procedures that would result in a better life outcome is not in my mind pro life.
This dirty old trucker will probably stew over this for the next few days (or longer)... I want to do something but not much I can do.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,308 posts)unacceptable.
Mr.Bill
(24,244 posts)and also be pro-choice in regards to others.
BlueBloodedAmerican
(117 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,308 posts)fine.
Celerity
(43,124 posts)DooverBeliever
(6 posts)This issue is about the freedom to decide.
Discussion Phrases:
Protect peoples freedom to decide
My decision for my life, your decision for yours
Ensure people have the power to decide
Respect womens decisions
And --
Politicians should not be making laws, this decision is between a person, their family, and their doctor. One-size-fits-all laws simply dont work when people are making personal medical decisions, such as the decision to have an abortion.
Mr.Bill
(24,244 posts)forced concealed carry.
Lonestarblue
(9,958 posts)All are government tyranny, yet taking away a womans right to make her own medical decisions is not tyranny by the government. These people are not only for ed birthers, they are anti freedom. How do they justify that with their claim to individual freedom for themselves?
Carlitos Brigante
(26,495 posts)OMGWTF
(3,942 posts)You have to give written consent for anyone else to use your dead body.
2naSalit
(86,332 posts)Instead of saying "Because she wanted one" about abortions, I think it is better to say, "Because she CHOSE to have one".
That statement works both ways, hard to argue about it. Choice is choice whether motivated by want or need, it's a choice.
calimary
(81,125 posts)But forced birth is good, too.
Whats best of all is that people on our side are THINKING on this. And coming up with useful MESSAGING.
Messaging is EVERYTHING!!!
THATS how you influence and manage public opinion.
FakeNoose
(32,596 posts)But I agree that "pro-life" has always been incorrect, and an obfuscation besides.
George Orwell saw today's Repuke Party evolving almost 80 years ago. (Animal Farm was published in 1945.)
Voltaire2
(12,963 posts)really get to the heart of the matter. They are literally forcing women to give birth, and in some states that includes dying in the process.
Forced birth puts the issue right into perspective.
barbtries
(28,769 posts)for a few years now. i have been begging people not to concede this to the misogynistic fascists, ever. Thank you for the thread.
ananda
(28,836 posts)They are all some sick bastards!
lindysalsagal
(20,592 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)some of them care if there is a birth or not. At least not if you look at that ridiculous proposed NC law. They seem perfectly content for women to die without giving birth so "forced birth" doesn't quite cover it either.
Voltaire2
(12,963 posts)the issue as the state compelling women to give birth even if it kills them. This is not about some individual nebulous choice, it is about compulsion and complete indifference to the circumstances.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)themaguffin
(3,822 posts)Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)"Forced birth" is much closer to truth.
mopinko
(70,022 posts)and thank ja i live in a free state.
Mysterian
(4,568 posts)So true.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Voltaire2
(12,963 posts)This is no longer about choice, it is about saving people from compulsory pregnancy and birth.
Wounded Bear
(58,604 posts)Forced birth works for me.
Anti-abortionists works too.
aocommunalpunch
(4,233 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)is more like it. Death for the women and death for the children (after they are forced to be born and then are shot dead at school). The Pro Death Party.
They want to kill through any means possible...no affordable health insur., unhealthy climate, poor working conditions, no $$ for food, etc. Pro Death all the way.
AdamGG
(1,287 posts)ShazzieB
(16,284 posts)I never, ever call them that, and if I ever did, it was long before I was active at DU, so long ago that I can't ever remember. I usually call them forced birthers, but I'm also okay with calling their stance anti-choice or anti'abortion.
The main thing is NOT to call them by the label they invented for themselves. The ONLY reason they call themselves "pro life" is to imply that everybody else is "pro death. That is a deliberate insult to anyone who doesn't share their beliefs, and it's rude and disrespectful as well as wildly inaccurate.
Any time we use that term, we are pandering to them AND appearing to give lip service to their claim that they are the only ones who care about "life." They do NOT deserve that, and we should NEVER give it to them.
Celerity
(43,124 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)The emotional and religious contortions come afterwards to support their stance. That is why their arguments make no sense.
L-
Takket
(21,529 posts)but i've recently switched to forced birth having seen that term enter the lexicon, as well.
Raine
(30,540 posts)will continue with that.
niyad
(113,074 posts)BootinUp
(47,085 posts)WinstonSmith4740
(3,055 posts)They've never been "pro-life". They've never given a rat's ass about kids once they're born. But unfortunately, "messaging" is the thing the RW loonies have perfected, and our side is still trying to figure out. We should have been calling them "anti-choice" or "forced birth" all along. We've let them define the parameters of this argument for way too long.
Rhiannon12866
(204,779 posts)Pro-life would be against the death penalty, for example, and we know that's not the case.
marybourg
(12,586 posts)But such is the power of the right wing mass media that even some Dems and progressives use that repugnant phrase.
BlueMTexpat
(15,365 posts)this term to describe the self-righteous forced birthers!
It is so patently false.
RicROC
(1,203 posts)love that one suggestion, No Forced Concealed Carry
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)Should not let them set the narrative!
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)I know it will never happen but worth a shot.
lark
(23,065 posts)They hate all life except that of rich white males and are forcing us to have babies to sell to rich white folks and to become cannon fodder for factories/fields with no safety controls. They are forced birthers who want to make all women nothing more than birthing machines.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Pro rapist - if you get pregnant, they will help the rapist ensure you carry his baby. So if some guy wants to rape and get someone pregnant (they wont help him rape) but they will DEFINITELY help him with forced pregnancy.
Same with pro incest.
Pro death - health of the woman? Who cares. Force her to carry, deliver etc. If she dies who cares as long as their beliefs are upheld
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)They are against the most basic freedom, which is the freedom over one's own body.
It's one thing to say you would never get an abortion. Although I would caution anyone against saying never...
But to legislate against the freedom over your own body. To have laws that say, if you get pregnant you must see the pregnancy through is beyond my understanding.
I think I've always known how extreme conservatives could be but this has been eye opening. I think for a lot of people.
Hopefully people vote.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)If they were "pro life", they'd take care of women and children and families after birth.
area51
(11,896 posts)they'd be on the forefront of trying to get the US universal healthcare; you can't have life without healthcare at some point. Also, they'd be working on getting affordable childcare available for everyone.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)IngridsLittleAngel
(1,962 posts)Like you, I've been saying that for years too. They don't give a shit about life. If they did, they'd not be such warmongers. They wouldn't be so in love with guns. They would've done more over the last 2 years to control the spread of COVID. They wouldn't be so anti-healthcare. They wouldn't be burning the planet to the ground in the name of profits. They wouldn't be doing so much to bully and punch down on women and POC and LGBTQ's.
They don't fucking care about life.
They are pro-forced birth. They are pro-fetus. They are pro-controlling women.
They're just hateful fascist assholes. What else is new?