General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow long before Bannon just assumes the fetal position at counsel's table?
Link to tweet
Scott MacFarlane
@MacFarlaneNews
·
Jul 20, 2022
Replying to @MacFarlaneNews
Bannon is rocking back and forth in his chair throughout this testimony. Not taking notes. Not speaking much with his attorney. Little expression
Some of the jurors appear to be dutifully taking notes As Jan 6 Cmte counsel continues to answer questions about subpoena
Scott MacFarlane
@MacFarlaneNews
·
Follow
Big courtroom. Jurors are seated about 30 feet away from Bannon . The prosecutor (and podium) stand between jury and Bannon defense table. (Bannon again is dressed in many layers of black clothes) Video screens show copies of subpoena documents and emails.
7:36 AM · Jul 20, 2022
sop
(18,611 posts)Beachnutt
(8,909 posts)and whispers "Is it too late for a plea bargain" ?
I'll sing like a canary...
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Prosecutors find it hilarious.
PortTack
(35,820 posts)Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,344 posts)To flee and he doesnt have time to pack.
hatrack
(64,885 posts)Since soap is scarce and expensive, just slap on another layer of clothes to stanch the stench from the Tainted Canned Hell-ham.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Regardless of "evidence" there is always jury nullification. Even if convicted, he is facing misdemeanor charges. A fair sentence for a first time conviction would not involve any jail time. Bannon is not going to face any penalty that he can not live with. If the judge were to break bad and sentence him to 60 days in jail, it would just give the man a well deserved rest, and possibly a bath and change of clothes.
Of course, I don't want a "fair sentence." I want the judge to make an example of the traitorous bastard.
Beachnutt
(8,909 posts)If he is found guilty does he have to answer the subpoena and go testify to j6 committee?
Walleye
(44,797 posts)Ocelot II
(130,523 posts)not to enforce compliance. I doubt the committee needs or wants his testimony, since he'd just lie and bloviate and turn it into a circus.
lame54
(39,758 posts)Walleye
(44,797 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,774 posts)Walleye
(44,797 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,774 posts)irisblue
(37,508 posts)Chainfire
(17,757 posts)CharleyDog
(816 posts)testify about Whitewater/Clinton impeachment?
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)If a case like his was in my county court, it would be settled, along with another half dozen cases, before the noon break.
I haven't been paying attention to this one. What is his defense?
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Hell , his lawyer said he had no defense at the evidentiary hearing after he lost all his motions.
This trial would take about an hour in my state. He wouldn't even get a jury.
2naSalit
(102,780 posts)Beachnutt
(8,909 posts)to the j6 committee ?
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)This is not the type of contempt proceeding where the judge can compel him to cooperate.
Beachnutt
(8,909 posts)will he be held in contempt again and another trial ?
They should issue another one the day the trial ends....
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Aside from the actual value of his testimony, which is probably nothing, does the law not require obeyance to the subpoena at some point? Could this jerk just walk? (I'm considering a 30-day contempt sentence a walk, even multiple 30-day sentences are still a walk.) I always thought the system took a very dim view of refusing to show for a summons.
I'm having a hard time convincing myself that the "law" is going to wrangle this mess in and corral these guys, making an example of them etc. in a fashion which respects the seriousness of the violations and works toward ensuring these things can't happen again. If it's not, then we can expect violence on a national scale to become the norm for our election day celebrations.
They'll have to build a whole new "non-partisan agency" just for election issues. The Bureau of Election Certifications Authority, Public Result Acceptance or We Bust Heads. BECAPRA-WBH, not a catchy acronym.
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Bannon's a nightmare, but he's at the top. He wasn't going to give up anything useful, even under oath.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)This is a clear cut case and he has no defense. The jury should convict in a short period of time.
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)It's only taking this long because of the players.
Evolve Dammit
(21,774 posts)Beachnutt
(8,909 posts)2naSalit
(102,780 posts)They pull out their asses with be presented here.
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)The deadlines were clear and Committee letters told him he was gonna be in trouble if he didn't comply.
In my experience, juries don't like to be treated like they're stupid.
But also in my experience, juries do the strangest things.
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Link to tweet
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
·
Follow
Bannon defense: he thought he was so central, executive privilege applied to him, even though he had not worked in the govt for three years
also Bannon defense: why did the Jan6 committed subpoena Bannon?
he was a nobody
Tierney Sneed
@Tierney_Megan
Bannon attorney Evan Corcoran has been cross examining the House committee staffer serving as governor witness. He tried to nail her down on who specifically decided that Oct 7/14 would be the subpoena deadlines Bannon faced https://cnn.com/politics/live-news/steve-bannon-trial-contempt-congress-07-20-22/index.html
9:15 AM · Jul 20, 2022
Who knew there was special executive privilege for coup plotters?
chowder66
(12,240 posts)Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)
chowder66
(12,240 posts)EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)There is another picture of him walking in the first day, but it's really Pigpen. OMG, the best laugh! This guy deserves this, after all the evil broadcasting he did, such as recommending that people get hung. And, Trump let him attend NSC meetings as a member. I shudder at that.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)Well, hes not Jewish, so hes not shuckling while davening. Maybe he thinks the jury is going to start throwing their shoes 👞.
housecat
(3,138 posts)Novara
(6,115 posts)... last week, wasn't it? I suppose he thought he could wriggle out of this trial if he offered to testify but the J6 committee doesn't need his testimony now.
I'm surprised the trial isn't over with already, especially because he doesn't have a defense.
EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)and then make a plea deal. Doesn't mean that he would testify to anything useful. I think he could say, "Fifth," and fulfill the deal. But, I don't know.
Ford_Prefect
(8,610 posts)so I'm guessing the judge will not be inclined to attach a short sentence to the (I assume) conviction.
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Not sure if a judge can consider prior offenses that were pardoned. My guess is no. It's not like he doesn't know about it though.
Judges decide the sentence and then come up with the rationale.
Ocelot II
(130,523 posts)And he'll follow the federal sentencing guidelines.
Nevilledog
(55,078 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,610 posts)The Pardon doesn't expunge his record in any way. The mechanics of his record would apply IMO. Considering his personal activities and the severity of the previous crime I do not expect a mild sentence. A number of trump nominees have proven to be more thoughtful judges than I expected.
Most judges regardless of political leanings do not like it when defendants or lawyers play silly buggers in THEIR courtroom. Bannon and his lawyer both have presented very foolish and rude defenses of Bannon's delaying. That won't play well when the time comes for the bench to consider the case for sentencing.
dlk
(13,247 posts)Reality is about to come crashing through his delusions of grandeur.
EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)He thinks he can do it, I guess, but it is terribly unpleasant and very, very noisy. Totally not worth this fuss, and falling on his sword for Trump won't get him anything.